| Revision as of 06:14, 6 July 2012 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,382,351 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2012/June. (BOT)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 19:14, 11 July 2012 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,382,351 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2012/July. (BOT)Next edit → |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Removal of sourced content using in-appropriate edit summary == |
|
|
With this you have effectively removed a well sourced content from a neutral encyclopedia, with a in-appropriate edit summary , self revert now. shouldn't you follow ] which you use so often |
|
|
--''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 12:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Already reverted by another editor. hope you will participate in talk rather than joining the edit war--''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 12:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{ec}}Sorry that was massive source falsification, go to talk page to discuss that issue, besides I '''never''' referred to ] as far as I can remember. --] <sup>]</sup> 12:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::The content is properly sourced, i have removed the phrase ''"War started on"''. removing the fully sourced para under the disguise of source falsification is not expected from an experienced editor like you . |
|
|
::About BRD. Its high time for you to read and learn ] if you havent yet. --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 13:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I know what is ], I only said that I never referred to it in any discussion as you claimed that I often do (So in short don't make false claims). Secondly I never said that its the only one problem with that para, and by saying that ''"...under the disguise..."'' I will advice you to always ] while considering other editor's edits. Lastly I have already said what I had to and I am not interested in edit war. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::if you are not interested in an edit war, then you should comment on the talk page, make a consensus and then edit depending on the consensus. rather than joining another '''R''' in the BRRRRD, cheers --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 13:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::If you once again read the related discussion on the talk page you will find that I have already commented there, if I find anyone interested in discussion there instead of edit warring, I will happily discuss the issue further. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:20, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::from what I can observe your preceeded your .--''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 13:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Wow! what an observation! I hope you use your observation abilities on understanding other editor's concerns regarding the content you repeatedly edit warred into the article too. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
{{od}}] Is what i am talking about. Ciao--''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 13:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
