| Revision as of 23:19, 26 April 2006 edit81.104.165.184 (talk) reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:27, 26 April 2006 edit undoCaptain scarlet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,979 editsm Reply to unsigned comment and put in semiantichronological orderNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| From the text: | From the text: | ||
| ⚫ | ::::They are not unsigned. You see that lovely timestamp on the end? That's the signature. I still can't see how you can accuse me of being uncivil, when ''you'' have no fewer than three times tried to discredit my opinions ''purely on the basis that I am editing from an IP address'', without making any attempt to actually ''respond'' to the points elsewhere (though I admit I might be wrong about this one). There's a world of difference between dismissal and response. ] 23:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| so you're telling me that I am uncivil because I dissagree with you ? Get over yourself ! I'm a not dismissing your comments as I am taking time to answer and giving you a correct answer, you'r egoing back to your square one at everyone of your edits. and leaving the timestampa lone still don't tell who the hck you are and I find it extremely frustrating if not unproductive to ''speak'' to a wall. ] 23:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::Well, the article isn't entirely clear about that fact, with references of things being built to the south and southwest (and if it's got me confused, then it's probably got a few others confused too). I'll look further into it to see what I can see. In the meantime, I'd ask that you remain civil, and not insult fellow users with your edit summaries. 22:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''In order to provide a more convenient service, a link line was constructed from the Midland Line from Sheffield south west of Rotherham Masborough to the Great Central south of Rotherham Central, and '''a brand new Rotherham Central station''' was opened in 1986.'' | :''In order to provide a more convenient service, a link line was constructed from the Midland Line from Sheffield south west of Rotherham Masborough to the Great Central south of Rotherham Central, and '''a brand new Rotherham Central station''' was opened in 1986.'' | ||
| Thus, this Rotherham Central and the original Rotherham Central are different stations, at different locations, so it would not be correct English to suggest that it was "re-opened" given it was new and was not open previously. 20:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | Thus, this Rotherham Central and the original Rotherham Central are different stations, at different locations, so it would not be correct English to suggest that it was "re-opened" given it was new and was not open previously. 20:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :The current Rotherham Central station is a new build station built on the site of the previous one. It is the same station reopened. None of the former buldings were reused but the station is the reopening of the old one. ] 22:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | :The current Rotherham Central station is a new build station built on the site of the previous one. It is the same station reopened. None of the former buldings were reused but the station is the reopening of the old one. ] 22:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ::Well, the article isn't entirely clear about that fact, with references of things being built to the south and southwest (and if it's got me confused, then it's probably got a few others confused too). I'll look further into it to see what I can see. In the meantime, I'd ask that you remain civil, and not insult fellow users with your edit summaries. 22:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::I remain civil and usually sign my comments with a regards, wich i believe is a sign of civility. the difficult thing is that unsigned edits are nothing and cannot be replied to knowing who or what will answer in there place. Please keep your advice to yourself and consider your past actions before judgin others. the article is well documented and sourced. Regards, ] 22:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | :::I remain civil and usually sign my comments with a regards, wich i believe is a sign of civility. the difficult thing is that unsigned edits are nothing and cannot be replied to knowing who or what will answer in there place. Please keep your advice to yourself and consider your past actions before judgin others. the article is well documented and sourced. Regards, ] 22:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| so you're telling me that I am uncivil because I dissagree with you ? Get over yourself ! I'm a not dismissing your comments as I am taking time to answer and giving you a correct answer, you'r egoing back to your square one at everyone of your edits. and leaving the timestampa lone still don't tell who the hck you are and I find it extremely frustrating if not unproductive to ''speak'' to a wall. I wouldn't be taking time to edit articles if i wasn't sure of facts, there enogh badly composed articles on wikipedia not to knowingly add some more, I'm sure you'll agree. I'm staring at the bok now and I can assure you that data on this article is correct and accurate. I wil leven go on location, disturbing my driving pattern to work and take photographs for you as gesture of my good will. egards, ] 23:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::::They are not unsigned. You see that lovely timestamp on the end? That's the signature. I still can't see how you can accuse me of being uncivil, when ''you'' have no fewer than three times tried to discredit my opinions ''purely on the basis that I am editing from an IP address'', without making any attempt to actually ''respond'' to the points elsewhere (though I admit I might be wrong about this one). There's a world of difference between dismissal and response. ] 23:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:27, 26 April 2006
From the text:
- They are not unsigned. You see that lovely timestamp on the end? That's the signature. I still can't see how you can accuse me of being uncivil, when you have no fewer than three times tried to discredit my opinions purely on the basis that I am editing from an IP address, without making any attempt to actually respond to the points elsewhere (though I admit I might be wrong about this one). There's a world of difference between dismissal and response. 81.104.165.184 23:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
so you're telling me that I am uncivil because I dissagree with you ? Get over yourself ! I'm a not dismissing your comments as I am taking time to answer and giving you a correct answer, you'r egoing back to your square one at everyone of your edits. and leaving the timestampa lone still don't tell who the hck you are and I find it extremely frustrating if not unproductive to speak to a wall. Captain scarlet 23:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, the article isn't entirely clear about that fact, with references of things being built to the south and southwest (and if it's got me confused, then it's probably got a few others confused too). I'll look further into it to see what I can see. In the meantime, I'd ask that you remain civil, and not insult fellow users with your edit summaries. 22:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- In order to provide a more convenient service, a link line was constructed from the Midland Line from Sheffield south west of Rotherham Masborough to the Great Central south of Rotherham Central, and a brand new Rotherham Central station was opened in 1986.
Thus, this Rotherham Central and the original Rotherham Central are different stations, at different locations, so it would not be correct English to suggest that it was "re-opened" given it was new and was not open previously. 20:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- The current Rotherham Central station is a new build station built on the site of the previous one. It is the same station reopened. None of the former buldings were reused but the station is the reopening of the old one. Captain scarlet 22:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- I remain civil and usually sign my comments with a regards, wich i believe is a sign of civility. the difficult thing is that unsigned edits are nothing and cannot be replied to knowing who or what will answer in there place. Please keep your advice to yourself and consider your past actions before judgin others. the article is well documented and sourced. Regards, Captain scarlet 22:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
so you're telling me that I am uncivil because I dissagree with you ? Get over yourself ! I'm a not dismissing your comments as I am taking time to answer and giving you a correct answer, you'r egoing back to your square one at everyone of your edits. and leaving the timestampa lone still don't tell who the hck you are and I find it extremely frustrating if not unproductive to speak to a wall. I wouldn't be taking time to edit articles if i wasn't sure of facts, there enogh badly composed articles on wikipedia not to knowingly add some more, I'm sure you'll agree. I'm staring at the bok now and I can assure you that data on this article is correct and accurate. I wil leven go on location, disturbing my driving pattern to work and take photographs for you as gesture of my good will. egards, Captain scarlet 23:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)