Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Politics: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:56, 8 August 2012 editY256 (talk | contribs)1,482 editsm WikiProject Political science: Fixing style/layout errors← Previous edit Revision as of 23:18, 8 August 2012 edit undoP.T. Aufrette (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers25,703 edits Burma → Myanmar requested-move notification: new sectionNext edit →
Line 154: Line 154:
==]== ==]==
Is it true that we don't have a Political science project? I couldn't find one so I set up {{noredirect|wp:WikiProject Political science|a redirect}} to this project so that people won't waste their time looking for it. ]<sup> ]</sup><sub> ]</sub> 19:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC) Is it true that we don't have a Political science project? I couldn't find one so I set up {{noredirect|wp:WikiProject Political science|a redirect}} to this project so that people won't waste their time looking for it. ]<sup> ]</sup><sub> ]</sub> 19:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

== Burma → Myanmar requested-move notification ==

A ] has been started (by ] (])) at ], which proposes to move:
* ] → {{no redirect|Myanmar}}

Please participate ] and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — ] (]) 23:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:18, 8 August 2012

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

WikiProject iconPolitics Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48



This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Years in politics articles.

The 2009 in politics, 2010 in politics, 2011 in politics articles need work. I have just now created a stubby 2012 in politics article but it need work. The whole series probably could do with checking over. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Personally i think it should be deleted as just another list to update with weblog like newspostings and nothing noable. as in half of those ITN-related lists(Lihaas (talk) 21:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)).
There is a series of articles going back to at least 2001. I think it is worth keeping them. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
I am deeply skeptical about their value to readers. No doubt they provide editors with an opportunity to make ritual edits in multiple articles. bobrayner (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Polling order

In Talk:United_States_Senate_election_in_Massachusetts,_2012#Polling_order, we are having a dispute concerning whether polls should be listed in chronological or reverse-chronological order. I would appreciate any outside input from the broader group of editors who contribute to these articles. Thanks! johnpseudo 16:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Globalization Project Proposal

HI WikiPolitics! I'm writing to inform you of my interest in starting a group that works on articles about globalization, in order to improve coverage of globalization on Misplaced Pages. Your group has banners on some of the articles that are key to this discussion, and I believe many perspectives and disciplines needs to come together if we're going to get it right. If you would consider supporting such a project, would you please swing by the Globalization Project Proposal and expressing that interest? Thanks so very much! LizFlash (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

List of members of Stortinget 2005–2009 at WP:FLRC

I have nominated List of members of Stortinget 2005–2009 for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Class Conflict Article

Because of the popular reemergence of the words "Class warfare" in the US political arena, I took a couple days rewriting and combining the Class conflict and Class Struggle articles into one Class conflict article. I noticed it has the some assessments on it. Perhaps now the article can be reassessed. Please leave me a "mission accomplished" message on my talk page if and when it's reassessed. Thanks. --XB70Valyrie (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Election predictions table template (UK but could have generic usage)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Electoral Calculus#Predictions table. -- Trevj (talk) 09:03, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Template:Z48

List of signers of the United States Constitution

I have nominated List of signers of the United States Constitution for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Globalization

The article Globalization has undergone major re-structuring. WikiProject Politics members are invited to review and comment on the article and add relevant missing information or sections in which your project may have an interest. Also, you may be interested in reviewing the updated Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Globalization proposal for a new WikiProject. Regards, Meclee (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

List of Tea Party politicians

Specifically, Talk:List of Tea Party politicians#Post-AfD clarification and possible slimming down. Input would be much appreciated. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011

Hi. The Wikimedia Foundation received a courtesy notice from the United States Department of State advising that their 2011 Human Rights Reports for 199 countries have been released. Naturally, they imagine we might be interested in the information or links for potential inclusion in Misplaced Pages articles: . (They have similar reports related to Human Rights here.)

The person who contacted us noted that many articles don't seem to address human rights issues on countries and adds that "Given the prominence that discussions of human rights in global affairs, I would respectfully submit that it’s worth a chapter heading for major countries."

Since the Wikimedia Foundation does not create or curate content in the articles, this is, of course, a community matter. I'm passing along the information to your project and a few others (Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Human rights; Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Countries; Misplaced Pages:WikiProject International relations) in case you find the information useful or in case her suggestion spurs discussion. If there's a better place that you know of, please feel free to pass it on. :)

Thanks! --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 15:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

That looks interesting and useful. Thanks for letting us know! bobrayner (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Report on the use of self-published sources

The first version of a report on the use of self-published sources is now available, in Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Misplaced Pages reliability. Some of the self-published sources listed in the report pertain to this project.

Suggestions on the report itself (a discussion has started here), and help in remedying the use of the self-published items that relate to this project will be appreciated. History2007 (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Yo Soy 132

Hey everyone, I'm inviting you to get involved with Yo Soy 132, a current event that is constantly being expanded. Don't leave this newbie all alone with all the work on this high importance rated article. ʝunglejill 04:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

A-Class review request

How do i request an A Class review for Finnish parliamentary election, 2011? Its just short of FA perfection so it should pass this.(Lihaas (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)).

Barack Obama FAR

There is a discussion ongoing at Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Barack Obama/archive9Lihaas (talk) 16:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Clientelism

In addition to being very dense, the page is written in highly academic language. Perhaps revising it, varying sentence length, more imple english etc might improve it.173.178.174.63 (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

New WikiProject Globalization

Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Globalization is a new project to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of aspects of Globalization and the organization of information and articles on this topic. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions and various resources; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians interested in the topic. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Meclee (talk) 18:45, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Parliament of Sweden

In parenthetical disambiguation, and in page names in general, should we use 'Parliament of Sweden' or 'parliament of Sweden'? Current usage is inconsistent, with

on the one hand and, on the other,

Thank you, -- Black Falcon 01:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Sweden has been notified. -- Black Falcon 01:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

RfC

Please consider joining the feedback request service.
An editor has requested comments from other editors for this discussion. This page has been added to the following list: When discussion has ended, remove this tag and it will be removed from the list. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below.

In parenthetical disambiguation, and in page names in general, should we use 'Parliament of Sweden' or 'parliament of Sweden'? -- Black Falcon 21:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Upper case for proper nouns. If the correct translation from Swedish is 'Parliament of Sweden', then capitalise, if not, then lower case. As in House or House of Commons (British), but lower house or upper house (British, Australian, etc). Peter S Strempel | Talk 23:42, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
    That's the key issue, I suppose. Parliament of Sweden#Name contains the following unsourced sentence: "In the Swedish constitution, the word is written with a lower-case 'r', thus marking that it is actually not a name of the parliament, but that it is just 'the parliament'." Usage across the English Misplaced Pages (e.g., Category:Members of the parliament of Sweden) and even in the Swedish Misplaced Pages (see sv:Sveriges riksdag) supports this.
    However, that claim is inconsistent with multiple key, English-language reliable sources, all of which capitalize 'Riksdag' or the word 'Parliament' when it refers to the Riksdag.
    1. This translation, hosted by the University of Bern, of the Constitution of Sweden—e.g., "Ordinary elections for the Parliament shall be held every fourth year."
    2. This information booklet, published by the Swedish Ministry of Justice—e.g., "The Riksdag, which consists of a single chamber, is made up of 349 members."
    3. This information page, hosted by Sweden.se ("The official gateway to Sweden")—e.g., "... a rule intended to prevent very small parties from getting into the Riksdag."
    4. This translation of the Constitution of Sweden, provided by the Riksdag itself—e.g., "Only a person who is entitled to vote may be a member or alternate member of the Riksdag."
    -- Black Falcon 23:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Read my lips: no new taxes FAR

I have nominated Read my lips: no new taxes for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Peter 17:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Demography_and_politics_of_Northern_Ireland#Requested_move

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Demography_and_politics_of_Northern_Ireland#Requested_move. KarlB (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Template:Z48

Sentinel of the Republic

I wanted to start a conversation about this because the page has been waiting for assessment and I've read it over and found it be a complete rendering of the limited information available on the party. I think it would be helpful to try to include Williams college and gain whatever other information may be available on the subject. I think it would also be helpful to create a new category of political movements of the 20th century. It would like to see some more images many of which may be available at Williams college.

I hope this helps

Cameroncowan (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Comparative Politics Textbook

Hello all! I’m working with the Saylor foundation to create a series of original, crowd-sourced textbooks that will be openly licensed and freely available on the web and within Saylor’s free, self-paced courses at Saylor.org. We are using Wikibooks as a platform to host this project and hope to garner the interest of existing members of the Wikibooks and Misplaced Pages community, as well as bring in new members! We thought that some of your members may be interested in contributing to our book Saylor.org's Comparative Politics. Azinheira (talk) 18:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

The historic Daisy video

Should this be the next Featured Pic?

The historic Daisy ad helped Lyndon Johnson win a landslide over Barry Goldwater in 1964 and is an important turning point in political and advertising history. The entire full length video is up for Featured Picture! Click here to check it out. – Lionel 09:12, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Government, Politics and Law

Ping for my topic on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Council#Government, Politics and Law: A Rather Problemsome Marriage. And leave the politics out of it! ;) Int21h (talk) 03:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DEAssembly

Template:DEAssembly has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 10:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tableheadingpartyorganizations

Template:Tableheadingpartyorganizations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 09:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Political science

Is it true that we don't have a Political science project? I couldn't find one so I set up a redirect to this project so that people won't waste their time looking for it. →Yaniv256 contribs 19:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Burma → Myanmar requested-move notification

A requested move survey has been started (by Marcus Qwertyus (talk)) at Talk:Burma, which proposes to move:

Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Categories:
Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Politics: Difference between revisions Add topic