| Revision as of 19:17, 28 August 2012 editCzarkoff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,494 edits →IE at DRN: sure← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:23, 29 August 2012 edit undoAndromedean (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,179 edits →Technologies used for Olympic sports: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| :::Ok, you want exact... You got it. Until another editor responds to my question regarding the MS-EULA, I'd appreciate it if you would restrain yourself from making absolute statements that leave no room for compromise or posts in this thread. So far the entire thread's been alive for less than 24 hours and you (in my perception) have made the significant amount of content posting to it. Therefore I'm requesting that you ease back from the keyboard and give other editors who probably aren't active during the USA based business day an opportunity to respond. Ok? ] (]) 19:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC) | :::Ok, you want exact... You got it. Until another editor responds to my question regarding the MS-EULA, I'd appreciate it if you would restrain yourself from making absolute statements that leave no room for compromise or posts in this thread. So far the entire thread's been alive for less than 24 hours and you (in my perception) have made the significant amount of content posting to it. Therefore I'm requesting that you ease back from the keyboard and give other editors who probably aren't active during the USA based business day an opportunity to respond. Ok? ] (]) 19:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Sure, no problems. I'm not going to overwhelm discussion, and I want to thank you for pointing this issue out. I just thought that if you indeed wanted to say something like that, you would do that on my talk page, not in DRN case; probably we have different opinions on such points. Anyway, thanks for pointing out the pitfall. Best regards, — ] (]) 19:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC) | ::::Sure, no problems. I'm not going to overwhelm discussion, and I want to thank you for pointing this issue out. I just thought that if you indeed wanted to say something like that, you would do that on my talk page, not in DRN case; probably we have different opinions on such points. Anyway, thanks for pointing out the pitfall. Best regards, — ] (]) 19:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Technologies used for Olympic sports == | |||
| Sorry I was responding to this statement | |||
| "if RfC won't help with dispute, feel free to file another request" | |||
| Could you please describe how asking for an independent ajudicator is soliciting for outside help? | |||
| I am very concerned about the misuse of rules. No doubt the RFC was placed on precisely so a user could just childishly keep reverting an article rather than providing valid well researched reasons. Please don't encourage this behaviour and support people attempting to write unbiased articles free of political bias. It takes me ages to keep replying to the same insane arguments and one member is oblvious to reason. --] (]) 13:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:23, 29 August 2012
 Archives | ||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Welcome to my talk page
I treat my talk page as a top level landing page for all discussion and as such archive stale discussions quickly. If a conversation started elsewhere, I will be watching it. If it starts here I will watch it here. Thanks.
Pizza Patrón
Thank you very much for photographing the Pizza Patrón HQ! Are you open to more photo requests? WhisperToMe (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Within Reason. I've done a bunch of photo requests this past couple of weeks (~20) so I'm probably going to be hands off for a couple of weeks as a 70 mile trip every weekend is not as fun. Hasteur (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- It's fine if I only list requests in the Dallas area, right? I have quite a few requests in the Dallas area. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Northern half of Dallas County I can do fairly quickly. South half (South of Downtown) takes longer. I also do some Collin County sites as I'm near the Dallas/Collin county border
- It's fine if I only list requests in the Dallas area, right? I have quite a few requests in the Dallas area. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Alright, so there are some requests. If you already have any of the following, please let me know. If you want to take your time or only do certain ones for now, that's fine too. If you want more than what I posted, please let me know, and I can post more.
Northern Dallas County:
- Highland Park:
HP Town Hall: 4700 DREXEL DRIVE | HIGHLAND PARK, TEXAS 75205Highland Park Department of Public Safety and the HP Library are next door - please photograph those too- File:Highland Park Municipal Building.JPG
- File:Highland Park Department of Public Safety.JPG
Highland Park Middle School/McCulloch Intermediate: 355 Granada Drive, Dallas, TX 75205Armstrong Elementary: 3600 Cornell, Dallas, TXBradfield Elementary: 4300 Southern, Dallas, TX
- Vickery Meadow
- Emmett J. Conrad High School - 7502 Fair Oaks Avenue Dallas, TX 75231
- Tasby Middle School - 7001 Fair Oaks Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231
- Jack Lowe, Sr. Elementary School - 7000 Holly Hill Drive Dallas, TX 75231
- McShan Elementary School - 8307 Meadow Road, Dallas, TX 75231
- Jill Stone Elementary School at Vickery Meadow - 6606 Ridgecrest Road, Dallas, TX 75231-7002
- Fire Station #37 - 6742 Greenville Avenue
- Preston Hollow
- St. Mark's School (Texas) - 10600 Preston Road, Dallas, TX 75230
- Ursuline Academy of Dallas - 4900 Walnut Hill Lane Dallas, Texas
- Pershing Elementary School - 5715 Meaders Ln, Dallas, TX
- Preston Hollow Elementary School - 6423 Walnut Hill Ln Dallas, TX 75230
- Preston Hollow Presbyterian School - 9800 Preston Road, Dallas, TX
- Preston Royal Library: 5626 Royal Lane
- Preston Post Office: 8604 TURTLE CREEK BLVD DALLAS, TX 75225-9998
- Netherland Park: 5600 Dittmer
- Preston Hollow Park: 6600 Park Ln
- Fire Station 41 - 5920 Royal Lane
- University Park
- UP City Hall/Police/Courts: 3800 University Blvd. University Park, TX 75205
- Peek Service Center: 4420 Worcola Street Dallas, TX 75206 (lower priority)
- Highland Park Library: 6517 Hillcrest Suite 110, 75205
- Highland Park Independent School District administration - 7015 Westchester Drive, Dallas, TX
- Highland Park High School - 4220 Emerson Dallas, Texas 75205
- Hyer Elementary: 3920 Caruth, Dallas, TX
- University Park Elementary: 3505 Amherst, Dallas, TX
- UP Parks (other than Holmes Aquatic, those are the lowest priority):
- When photographing a park, please get the sign announcing the name, like this: File:AgnesMoffitPark.JPG
- Burleson Park -
3000 University @ Dublin2900 Daniel Avenue - Caruth Park - 7801 Hillcrest Ave @ Caruth
- Curtis Park and Holmes Aquatic Center - 3501 Lovers Lane @ Dickens
- Germany Park - 6401 Lomo Alto @ University
- Smith Park - 4000 Greenbrier @ Pickwick
- Williams Park - 3801 University @ Williams Pkwy
- Central Dallas:
- DISD HQ: 3700 Ross Avenue Dallas, TX 75204-5491
Requests for southern Dallas County:
Wilmer-Hutchins ISD admin building (it's across the street from a gas station, so I suppose you can park at the gas station and take the photo from there) - 3820 East Illinois Avenue, Dallas, TX - I fear it could be demolished or have its markings removed (last time I saw it, it was still marked as the WHISD admin building), so I would very much like to have it photographed
DFW Airport area, in Tarrant County:
- American Airlines/AMR Corporation corporate headquarters: 4333 Amon Carter Boulevard Fort Worth, TX 76155
- DFW Airport Admin Building (you will not have to pay the toll to access it): 3200 East Airfield Drive (75261)
- Fort Worth ARTCC: 13800 FAA Road, Fort Worth, Texas, United States 76155
Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Bad news, the WH ISD building (which I assume was on that little triangle of land between the gas station and the highway) is already demolished. Hasteur (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Just to make sure, was it located on this parcel? WhisperToMe (talk) 22:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- If it's the building that's listed as the Imperialist University of America, I got a shot of that. There were no WH-ISD logos on it. I was referring to the little triangle as the 2nd link you sent is what I though was the WHISD building. I'll upload what I have shortly Hasteur (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. I look forward to seeing the image :) WhisperToMe (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- If it's the building that's listed as the Imperialist University of America, I got a shot of that. There were no WH-ISD logos on it. I was referring to the little triangle as the 2nd link you sent is what I though was the WHISD building. I'll upload what I have shortly Hasteur (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- There is a triangle of land with nothing on it, but maybe that's not where the building was after all... WhisperToMe (talk) 22:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- The triangle that may have been empty was empty back in 2001: http://msrmaps.com/image.aspx?T=4&S=9&Z=14&X=7100&Y=36216&W=3&qs=%7cDallas%7cTX - It seems like the building itself is still standing WhisperToMe (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Please let me know when you post any photos taken over the weekend. I'll add them to articles WhisperToMe (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry it took so long to upload. Hardware failure prevented me from uploading quickly. Hasteur (talk) 08:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! I just added it to the WHISD article WhisperToMe (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Highland Park Done. Hasteur (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for getting these! WhisperToMe (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Adnews page name needs changing
Hi Hasteur,
I created a new page called Adnews, but it needs to be changed to AdNews. I didn't realise it had a capital N when creating it.
Thanks,
Luke — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke.battersby (talk • contribs) 03:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have moved the article for you, but upon looking at the article I noticed several fatal problems. As such I have proposed that it be deleted. Hasteur (talk) 11:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
DRN needs your help!
Hey there Hasteur, I noticed you've listed yourself as a volunteer at the dispute resolution noticeboard but you haven't been very active there lately - I was hoping if you had some spare time if you could take a look there and offer some assistance. Thanks again for your help :-) Steven Zhang 11:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- I subscribe to the philosophy that unless another volunteer needs help, I stay out of other DRN threads as it makes the conversation difficult to figure out the answer. I haven't been able to get the first post on one of the threads for a while so I'm really hesitant to jump in the middle of another volunteer's efforts. Hasteur (talk) 11:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's fair enough - sometimes disputes are kinda opened and left, though. Wherever you can help is welcome - but I know you've done a lot of DRN in the past, so thanks again. Steven Zhang 11:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
IE at DRN
Hello!
Dimitrij, can we have time to let others speak up?
— User:Hasteur 18:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Sure. I thought the question was supposed to collect answers from everyone including me. I would appreciate if you would specify the editor you are asking, if you believe that some disputants shouldn't answer it. Thanks in advance! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm specifically asking you to back off from the rapid fire responses that leave no room for compromise. Hasteur (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Could you please give some more exact suggestion? Should I respond last? Or not before 12 hours since the question was asked? Or may be avoid participating in this thread at all? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, you want exact... You got it. Until another editor responds to my question regarding the MS-EULA, I'd appreciate it if you would restrain yourself from making absolute statements that leave no room for compromise or posts in this thread. So far the entire thread's been alive for less than 24 hours and you (in my perception) have made the significant amount of content posting to it. Therefore I'm requesting that you ease back from the keyboard and give other editors who probably aren't active during the USA based business day an opportunity to respond. Ok? Hasteur (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Sure, no problems. I'm not going to overwhelm discussion, and I want to thank you for pointing this issue out. I just thought that if you indeed wanted to say something like that, you would do that on my talk page, not in DRN case; probably we have different opinions on such points. Anyway, thanks for pointing out the pitfall. Best regards, — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm specifically asking you to back off from the rapid fire responses that leave no room for compromise. Hasteur (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Technologies used for Olympic sports
Sorry I was responding to this statement
"if RfC won't help with dispute, feel free to file another request"
Could you please describe how asking for an independent ajudicator is soliciting for outside help?
I am very concerned about the misuse of rules. No doubt the RFC was placed on precisely so a user could just childishly keep reverting an article rather than providing valid well researched reasons. Please don't encourage this behaviour and support people attempting to write unbiased articles free of political bias. It takes me ages to keep replying to the same insane arguments and one member is oblvious to reason. --Andromedean (talk) 13:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)