Revision as of 19:04, 2 November 2012 editEmporole (talk | contribs)344 editsm Emporole moved page Talk:Wallace Collection to Talk:The Wallace Collection: The museum is called "The Wallace Collection", never "Wallace Collection".← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:35, 11 January 2013 edit undoHam II (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers56,568 edits requested moveNext edit → | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Arms and armour== | ==Arms and armour== | ||
No mention is made of the extensive collection of weapons which fill the ground floor.--] (]) 17:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC) | No mention is made of the extensive collection of weapons which fill the ground floor.--] (]) 17:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Requested move == | |||
{{Requested move/dated|Wallace Collection}} | |||
] → {{no redirect|Wallace Collection}} – No need for the definite article, per ] ] 22:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:35, 11 January 2013
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
References
I can't seem to get the references listed in the References Section, anyone help?--81.106.79.133 11:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Peacocky sentence
I have removed this sentence:
"The Wallace Collection sits favourably amongst a group of private collections, primarily European, which include; The Royal Collection, as the greatest private collection in the world, Waddesdon Manor, the Bowes Museum, Herrenchiemsee, Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Frick Collection and the Liechtenstein Museum."
This serves no purpose but to puff the collection. Sits favourably? What does that mean. Is this a list of private collections? If so, then we should just put a link in the "see also" section to a list of private collections. Just listing these names serves no real purpose. It was claimed that the facts are not in dispute; I don't see any facts to dispute, just a list of vaguely explained names. Why pick (only) these? This list smacks of original research. --Eyrian 16:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Literary allusions
The Wallace collection comes up in loads and loads of novels, particularly; I'm thinking most obviously of Iris Murdoch and Anthony Powell but I'm certain there are tons of others. Someone should make a section on this and if no one else does I will in a longish time
Jaguarjaguar (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Arms and armour
No mention is made of the extensive collection of weapons which fill the ground floor.--KTo288 (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
The request to rename this article to Wallace Collection has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
The Wallace Collection → Wallace Collection – No need for the definite article, per WP:THE Ham 22:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Categories: