Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:22, 27 January 2013

Non-believer

C'mon, I swear I'm God, why did you delete the page?! Now none of my broods will know of me. Rain-ash (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Topic ban?

I'm not sure what I did to upset you that much on the Transformers: Timelines deletion review. When I asked around as to how to get them looked at I was told to go to a deleiton review. Is there a better page to get opinions as a pre-deletion review perhaps? Some place where I can get an opinion as to whether sources justify an article? Mathewignash (talk) 14:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Spot on

Exactly. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Computing subject at AFD

• Is functions (AfD discussion)

You might want to go back to this one. Uncle G (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion

Hearfourmewesique (talk) 04:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Michael R. Vega

If a comic book artist had works published by a notable publishing company, that makes him automatically notable. Duh. --Stormwatch (talk) 22:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

• Not true at all. See WP:ARTIST. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

AfD Sedra Bistodeau - review?

Thanks for your support for deleting Khrystenn Asariah. That one went down messy (your vote actually got deleted by the creator of the article, at one point.) But it went down.

On Sedra Bistodeau, however, I fear there's a rush to judgment. The initial AfD listing significantly understates her accomplishments. ("15 year old fiddler and student that won a local state fair contest." ) I've improved the citations, added some material. This has moved me from neutral to Weak Keep, but it's possible I'm starting to get too close to the subject. Briefly: she's won several national-level U.S. fiddling competitions, has been the sole subject of one RS newspaper article, and also of 5-1/2 minutes of public television documentary (albeit metropolitan/state TV, not national.) Your added input on the discussion (per WP:MUSICBIO guidelines) would be welcome; it's possible she still falls short. Yakushima (talk) 10:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

• Your attempts to fix a questionable article have my respect, but I don't see anything so fundamentally different to reverse a vote. It seems to come down to whether the "National Old-Time Fiddlers Contest" is enough to pass WP:MUSIC on its own, like, say, winning a Grammy would be. I don't really think it is. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Well, if it would clarify matters, feel free to nominate National Old-Time Fiddlers Contest for deletion. WP:MUSICBIO says the won/placed contests have to be "major" -- maybe oldtime fiddling is irretrievably small-niche country music. And we might agree that WP:N is necessary (though not necessarily sufficient) for a contest to be considered "major". I'd even support a change to WP:MUSICBIO, to make that clear. I looked into the other national competition mentioned (which claims certification by National Oldtime Fiddlers' Contest (R)), and I suspect it hasn't quite gotten enough coverage for general notability. Maybe no oldtime fiddling contest could meet the requirement of "major". But with a 25,000 people showing up for the Weiser contest and its associated festival, how could anyone call it "small"? Yakushima (talk) 10:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Firstly, it has nothing to do with genre. Fiddling might be niche, but that in and of itself does not have any impact on notability or verifiability. Indeed, I'd even say the opposite is true, that unusal performers if anything have an advantage because they make a potentially more interesting news story. Teenager who wants to be like Britney Spears? Who cares? Teenager who's a virtuoso Siberian throat singer or accomplished at playing the serpent? Send a reporter over there! No, we have to look at the notability of the award and whether it can reasonably be said to confer notability on anyone who recieves it. Grammy, sure. Tony award, sure. BRIT award, sure. Fiddling contest held in the local high-school gym? Heck no. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Require noting one's deletions of AfD votes and comments?

Your name and a comment you wrote arose in discussion of my proposed change to AfD Wikiettiquette guidelines. I'm interested in your thoughts on the matter, particularly since it was one of your votes that got silently deleted in the Khrystenn Asariah Afd, leading to my proposal. Yakushima (talk) 06:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Jory Rabinovitz

You deleted an entry on an artist that meets notability guideline: (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition. Socrates Sculpture Park is a very reputable art center and the award he received is notable to anyone in the field of contemporary art. Also, he has won 5 silver medal world championships in Pinball. The article might have used some work, but I don't think permanent deletion was called for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinballfantasy808 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

• Before I respond, I have a question: do you have anything that might be considered a conflict of interest regarding this subject? Specifically, are you Jory Rabinovitz or a member of his immediate family or friends? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Academic Sports League (2nd nomination)

As you commented in the previous AFD (closed as no consensus), you may be interested in commenting at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Academic Sports League (2nd nomination). NW (Talk) 04:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I just punched it delete. (like the first, it was simply "next on the list") However, I stand by my first close. When article creators or other interested parties come to my talk page saying "why did you delete my article?", I need to be able to tell them "because there was a consensus to do so here and I didn't feel that I could do that with a straight face with the first AFD. (that's why I don't like to close "1 voters" as "delete"). Since it was a low risk article without any WP:V or WP:BLP issues, I felt that "no consensus" was the proper close in this case. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

inre Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jack and the Beanstalk (2010 film)

If you might take a look at the work performed on Jack and the Beanstalk (2010 film) and revist the AFD discussion, I believe a redirect and partial (and now sourcable) merge be done to the Jack and the Beanstalk#Adaptations... the one place where film adaptations of this children's tale have a reason to be mentioned in context. I also suggest a redirect of the film title to A) prevent a premature recreation and B) save the history so the redirect might be reverted and the article sourced if RS DVD reviews are found. Schmidt, 08:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

• Updated discussion. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Ray William Johnson

Hello, I see that you are the administrator responsible for salting Equals Three, the popular show name of Ray William Johnson. This article has now been created, and has stood for over a week without a deletion attempt. Could you please create Equals Three as a redirect to Ray William Johnson, as well as any other related pages which were repeated created, that I am unaware of? Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 00:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

• That's not an article I want a hand in creating, though I have unprotected it per reasonable request. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Care to weigh in?

Care to weigh in on The Hot Club of Detroit? (I for one am disinclined to partake of the holy deletion debate sacrament any time soon). James470 (talk) 02:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Specials (internet TV series)

Hi there Starblind!

I have a question about a Misplaced Pages page I created for our web series about young adults with special needs called The Specials The page had been called The Specials (internet TV show) and was then moved on 1st August 2010 to The Specials (internet TV series). This new page was then deleted by yourself on 29th September 2010 on the grounds of A7 - "no explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content".

I was hoping you could advise me on whether you could Userfy this page so I could work on it (ideally with your guidance) and see if I could make it worthy of reinstatement? In terms of notability I was hoping The Specials would meet the criteria, though admittedly a lot of the following I had yet to add to the page:

We won the Webby Award and People's Choice Award for Reality category at the 14th Annual Webby Awards, we were also nominated in the Documentary Series category. We were finalists in the Original Series category in the Vimeo Awards 2010. We are currently nominees in the Banff International Pilots Competition. 'The Specials' has also been included in the TV Shows section of YouTube. Our series has been covered in the national UK press: The Guardian, BBC Radio 4, Ouch! BBC's disability website, .net magazine, The Brains Behind The Specials, September 2010. 'The Specials' is also an important web series for the learning disability community around the world and the housemates are listed in the Down Syndrome Misplaced Pages page.

Finally we are planning to bring out a new series later this year so our Misplaced Pages page would be destined to evolve. It would be great to hear your thoughts on this and I would be grateful for any help you can give me.

All the best

Katykada (talk) 12:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

• I would be willing to move this article to the incubator so that it can be worked on (I agree it wouldn't be an A7 today), though if it's to be made into a real article it needs to be done with someone with no conflict of interest regarding the subject, as creating articles for things you own is highly discouraged. If I undelete it to the incubator would you agree to let it go and leave it up to other users without a conflict of interest? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Andrew that's great. Appreciate your point about the conflict of interest, so I'm happy enough to hear that it will be moved to the incubator. Hopefully some of the show's fans may want to work on it instead. Excuse my ignorance but will it be easy for them to find it in the incubator? Cheers, Katykada (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Andrew, a blogger on disability issues based in the US is keen to write 'The Specials' wikipedia page. Could you confirm for me where the old page is? I have clicked on the above links and neither holds the previous content and I am not clear if either has been undeleted and moved to the incubator? Thanks again for your advice on all of this. Cheers, Katykada —Preceding undated comment added 09:34, 15 July 2011 (UTC).

The Specials - follow-up question

Hi Andrew, sorry to post a new section but you hadn't responded to either of my questions (above) so I thought maybe you hadn't realised they were there. I was hoping you could tell me where 'The Specials' wikipedia page now is - has it been undeleted and put in the incubator? Also which page is it? The Specials (Internet TV Series) or The Specials (Internet TV Show)? A blogger on disability issues from the US is willing to write the page and I wanted to let her know where it is and maybe access the old material including the photo we had uploaded. Thanks again for your advice on this. Cheers (Katykada (talk) 10:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)).

Hi Andrew, ignore my posts on this page. I have sorted out the move to the incubator with another editor. All the best, (Katykada (talk) 16:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)).

No problem, had a short wiki-hiatus whilst traveling this summer but I'm back now. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Why ?

I can not believe you live in a country called the land of the free yet you hate me so much I can not even post about my traditional native spirtuality.I will pray for you my brother.No matter what you do I will always have love in my heart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randy shagalott (talk • contribs) 03:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Starblind! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

deleted ROACE

Hi,

I have noticed that you deleted the article ROACE. I cannot see what the deleted text was about, but I was, nevertheless, warned to contact an administrator who erased it. The admin is you. I plan to create an article on "Return on Average Capital Employed", which abbreviates to ROACE. It is a metric used in stock analysis. I have written many articles about such metrics and ratios, and this one is still missed. One of the last ones.

May I re-create the article?

Best regards, Lamro (talk) 08:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

• Sure you can. I don't know what the deleted article was either, the only text in it was "ROACE", which was why it was deleted. It isn't protected or anything so you should be able to create a new one just fine. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Your recent bizarre actions

Okay, so before you launch into personal attacks, perhaps you could engage with the current thread on WP:AN? And yes, I am aware that it is possible to cherrypick poor examples from my unprotections, and I am sorry for those mistakes, but I feel that they by no means undermine the value of unprotecting the rest. Regards, - Jarry1250  10:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Revert if you may

--George Ho (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Starblind,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Misplaced Pages administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Young June Sah --Yjune.sah (talk) 20:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of films considered the best for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Thank you, Schmidt, 01:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

An AFD you commented in before, has a sequel

The same articles in a previous AFD you commented in are at AFD again. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Thelma Harper (2nd nomination) Dream Focus 21:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

TBrandley

Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 02:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 02:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

False allegation

You have made an allegation in AfD that I have been "using the article as a means to bother rather than improve the encyclopedia". This is both untrue and entirely without foundation. Unless you believe you can offer evidence of my motives to the contrary, I invite you to strike, or preferably remove, it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely not. And your failure to acknowledge your obvious misconduct has eroded any presumption of good faith (thugh admittedly, the fact that you've been at it literally for years meant there wasn't much of that left anyway). STOP PESTERING HAWKINS while you still have the opportunity to do so voluntarily. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

I note your refusal to remove, and you repetition and exaggeration of, your false and baseless accusation, despite there being no shred of evidence to support it. Shame on you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Help us develop better software!

Thanks to all of you for commenting on the NOINDEX RfC :). It's always great to be able to field questions like these to the community; it's genuinely the highlight of my work! The NOINDEX idea sprung from our New Page Triage discussion; we're developing a new patrolling interface for new articles, and we want your input like never before :). So if you haven't already seen it, please go there, take a look at the screenshots and mockups and ideas, and add any comments or suggestions you might have to the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

afd closure

I was asked a question about one of your closures, and commented, at DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

My apologies...

I am the real person here, and I finally got my obsessive behavior under control. I have finally managed to control myself. Apparently the account Starkiller88 has been compromised early on in September 2007. I'd better avoid using this account. 115.133.222.178 (talk) 04:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I've blocked this IP for 24 hours for block evasion. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

And just for info, he's been straight back to Fobos-Grunt again. I've blocked that IP for 24 hours too, and I guess we can semi-protect if he keeps coming back to it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams

I saw a comment or two you made in the past about the subject of this article being mistreated on this site. Is there something that can be done about a user on here who keeps posting controversial edits about her still? Can it be undone? Go to the page and you will see that he made the last edit, which doesn't seem right to add, and he just won't quit until something is done about him. In the real world, I work for an LGBT organization and I hear about people like her being harassed in indirect ways, just because of their orientation, and I hear it all the time. 74.115.212.21 (talk) 17:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Lord Huron

hi i saw you commented on the deleting of the article on this artist. i wrote a comment on the talk page saying why i think it should exist with some sources. can i make the article?Happy monsoon day 16:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

please note this is thoroughly resolvedHappy monsoon day 01:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:PC2012/RfC 1

Regarding your comment at Misplaced Pages:PC2012/RfC 1, it appears you misunderstand what is being discussed. The current RFC is only about pending changes level 2, which would restrict all editors without the reviewer permission from editing, not just new editors. As I understand it there will be another RFC covering the scope of pending changes level 1, which is the one the effects only new editors. I don't know if it will effect your !vote, but I thought you may want to know. Monty₈₄₅ 15:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok, clarified slightly. Still thoroughly less than thrilled about yet another Pending Changes vote, and it seems we're being overly cautious to the point of absurdity. Wars have been started with much less debate and consideration than Misplaced Pages wringing its collective hands over pending changes. After awhile it all becomes a bit of a farce. See you at the inevitable next one, I guess. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Dropping by to say I've added a question (below), but to respond to this: absolutely, there's a cost to having even one RfC (it can easily frame things as a battle and limit useful debate), much less as many RfCs as we've had on Pending Changes. On the RfC on PC/2, though, if you look back through the supports from the last RfC, you'll see there was almost no mention of PC/2 or anything related to PC/2 (I count 3 mentions that are even tangentially relevant in the first 106 votes). So ... this is something that actually does need some discussion, and both supporters and opposers are saying some things that I'd really like to follow up on in committee work. - Dank (push to talk) 14:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

One question added after your vote

Thanks much for voting. When we put the RfC together, one thing we were all agreed on was that it should run a week, so that it didn't take too much time away from more central questions ... but we decided not to put that in the RfC, I think because we didn't want to force a cutoff in the middle of a good debate. At this point, I've added that question, if you'd like to vote on that one too. - Dank (push to talk) 14:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase

Hello. As a participant in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Misplaced Pages has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Arbcom elections

Sooooo, Any chance you might be interested in running this year? : ) - jc37 21:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

• Good question but I'm not nearly active enough--I only have 10 edits in the past two months. I've mostly dedicated myself to travel this year and most of next year too. I don't think I'd be able to put the time in to be a good Arb anytime soon. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

  Fair enough, thanks for considering it : ) - jc37 21:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Just a note: we were apparently talking about apples and oranges

In Australia school newsletters and other publications are always written by staff members (usually either a teacher or one of the school's admin. officers), and then given to the Principal for approval. If there's student content included, then that is vetted first by their Teacher, or the Faculty Head Teacher, and then still goes to the Principal for approval. This is because there have been complaints about things written in school newsletters that were unverifiable, overly promotional or non-neutral and so on and so forth, and, hence, the need for executive approval (and they have departmental and statutory guidelines that they need to follow in what they approve or disapprove).

So, for example, there's likely to be a whole slew of announcements around now about the end-of-school results for students, much of which (for example top in school) will only be mentioned in the school newsletters. They're also invaluable for finding notable alumni from certain schools.

On the other hand, you seem to be talking about student newspapers. Yeah, I'd agree that they're not notable. ˜danjel  04:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of Rahul Easwar wikipedia page

Sir,

This is regarding the page I want to contribute to Misplaced Pages on Rahul Easwar which was subjected to speedy deletion. In response to the objections i had provided with many resourceful links clearly showing the notability of Mr. Easwar in our nation and its media. Kindly let me know what i should do more to project my case and please let me know how I can reinstate this page. The link to the page i had created is given Rahul Easwar Also the page containing the discussions with the administrator who deleted the page is given. Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review#Rahul_Easwar Carolchriskevin (talk) 11:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Kevin

Caryacarya

Hi Andrew,
I was following through my watchlist, the conversations going on in the deletion discussion of the book series Caryacarya. I wasn't involved until now, but I saw that the period was extended another week. So, I was planning on voting and pointing out some points and even editing the article for its betterment. As a WP editor, my prime aim is the betterment of WP and I have no CoI. I'm myself an admin in the Ladino WP and I translate the interface.
The User:Abhidevananda, is actually a newbie of a few months. I think he means to contribute well to the WP, however without being well-acquainted to the policies and guidelines of Misplaced Pages, he used primary sources extensively to create or to edit neutral-looking articles. He is bold by behaviour but means no harm. Some other editors, instead of explaining him and/or trying to cooperate with him, used a bureaucratic language and challenged what he was doing. He felt personally attacked, especially due to the not-very-gentle language they were using, even though the intentions of the other party was probably not so. And as a result first he reacted back and then got cold-feet to WP.
I don't know whether it is considered canvassing or no, both parties (no need for names), went to ask others for help. As the other party, knew better the rules and the functioning of WP, got the upper hand in creating a bad image for almost all articles in which Abhidevananda was involved. The tones of "passion" in other editors siding with him, made the show case seem worse. This is my observation of what has been the unvoiced events in this conflict until now.
Quoting from WP:Trifecta, "Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia created by the community through collaboration." The two words out of three (namely, community and collaboration) is what I'm referring to. The responsibility always lies with the older and more-experienced party, the have to be wise and welcoming, especially to the new editors of WP. What they had to do, instead of edit-warring, constant content-removal and propaganda, was (and still is) what those two words - community and collaboration - requires. My message is not to you personally but to all involved parties.
While this is the case, I believe that the points that Keep parties were making were under-represented. The point, "The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable motion picture, or other art form, or event or political or religious movement." was never properly contested.
I believe that a temporary undeletion, would be for the best interest of Misplaced Pages, so it would give some more proper time to both parties to sort out things "in civility". And on the while, I can have more time to gather some RS and edit the article, so it has a neutral tone and doesn't look like an advertisement. If, at the end of a week, ther aren't any RS, I believe it is best to redirect the article to Ananda Marga, as it's the holy scriptures of it.
Most sincerely,
And friendly, --Universal Life (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Recent Deletion review revolving around Wildebeest

Hi there. When it came to the deletion review of Wildebeest, I was wondering if you have any further comments to contribute to that deletion review to have it officially restored. Especially since they might plan an appearance of a Wildebeest in the upcoming comics of The New 52. Rtkat3 (talk) 3:56, January 26 2013 (UTC)

Mention at AN/I

Mention at AN/I

I have mentioned you at AN/I with regards to a request to block User:Danjel. ClaudeReigns (talk) 20:22, 27 January 2013 (UTC)