Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:27, 17 June 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Physics: Biographies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Alternative views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Magnecule page were merged into Ruggero Santilli. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-03-08. The result of the discussion was keep.

the Jews-and-journals thing

In Denunciation of Steven Weinberg's Scientific Gangsterism Santilli says "I am strongly against the above ethnic profile of Steven Weinberg because he is not representative of the Jewish physics community despite his undeniable sinister political clout at the Nobel Foundation, CERN, FERMILAB and similar settings. ", and others texts in the page are signed by other people.

This is backed by a note in one of his books Hadronic Mathematics, etc. "Numerous Jewish mathematicians, theoreticians and experimentalists have collaborated with and/or supported the author in the development of hadronic mechanics (...) As a matter of fact, the author has received to date more support from Jewish scientists than that from Italian colleagues, the author being a U. S. citizen of Italian birth and education. (...) Needless to say, the denial of a Jewish component in the scientific controversies raging on Einstein followers would be a damaging hypocrisy, but we are referring to a very small segment of the Jewish scientific community" (emphasis added)

The article implied that Santilli complains about all Jews. We should make clear that he complains only about some Jewish physicists. --Enric Naval (talk) 14:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the sentence "because they were controlled by a group of Jews" is highly misleading.

Editors of this page should read the WP:BLP - Content should:

1. Contain a neutral point of view (NPOV) and

2. Verifiability.

The posted third party quote is incorrect and damaging to Santilli's character. Prof. Santilli has only recorded complaints in his past about harmful individuals, and not a collective group. Invalid third party allegations do not belong here.

From the same WP:BLP page: "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing."

-- 208.54.85.149 (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

"Jewish domination of APS' journals" is in the first source for that section, and "led by Weinberg" is in the second, both in his own words. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

The first source that you are using is a Non-Neutral Point of View from a third party that was writing it in reference to a POEM attempting to be humorous that was published in a book. Just because it is in print does not mean it qualifies as being a verifiable, NPOV source to be used on wikipedia.

See screenshot of poem in third party book: http://imgur.com/u8Fqv

It's a contentious source, unjustly damaging to Santilli, and inaccurately shifts the blame from individuals to a collectivist group.

It does not belong here no matter how badly you wish to portray Santilli in a negative light. 208.54.85.149 (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

I haven't read the source in question, but I just want to point out that there is no requirement that sources be NPOV--only that the article itself be NPOV. Now, we, of course, wouldn't use an advocacy source to verify a statement of fact. But if, as others are saying, Santilli is actually quoted in the article, and it is not explicitly clear that the claim is a "joke", then the information should say. Misplaced Pages isn't portraying him in a negative light--it seems like, if what Arthur Rubin says is correct, that Santilli portrayed himself in a negative light. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I've looked at the sources. The first source by Lustig appears to be reliable. The other (scientificethics.org), does not. The latter is just a random third party group...and looking at their main page, one of their major purposes seems to be to criticize Misplaced Pages (which is fine, WP needs criticism, but that certainly doesn't give an indication that they are a well-written source with a history of reliable fact-checking). I'm going to remove the second source, but keep the first, which I think keeps the information intact. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Can we quote one of Santilli's books? He made a note in his book Hadronic Mathematics, etc. (I quoted the note in my first comment in this section). --Enric Naval (talk) 15:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

We are hacking and counter-hacking Santilli while we are being accused of “scientific fraud” for applying Einstein where He does not belong. But then, hear this! hear this!, Santilli comes to our rescue by enlarging rather substantially the applicability of Einstein’s axioms, thus voiding claims of fraud against us. Check out this paper http://santilli-foundation.org/docs/super-sub-luminal-speeds.pdf and tell me if I am wrong. Under “isorealization” (where “iso” stands to preserve Einstein) SR becomes applicable to all conditions I know. NewWorriedLad (where is WorriedLad?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewWorriedLad (talk • contribs) 20:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

You're wrong. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

You must really hate the guy for throwing judgment on a highly technical paper without even glancing. This is very damaging to us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewWorriedLad (talk • contribs) 21:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

What makes you think I didn't read the paper? And if you are a member of the "us" referred to in your comment, you shouldn't be editing Misplaced Pages articles related to RS at all. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Arthur Rubin, you have passed all limits of decency. The broadening of the applicability of Einstein axioms in the above quoted paper (see alsp the news of vthe RMS Foundations) should make all physicists happy, whether Jewish or not, but you opposed it in your preceding post because the author is Santilli. Yet had Santilli been a Jew, you would have praised his paper to the sky. Hence the price to be paid by all of us for our evident discrimination of non-Jewish scientists. In 10-12 you stated in this page “I have been told by important people that Santilli is anti-Semitic,” while it is known that Santilli’s family risked their lives during WWII in central Italy to shelter Jews. RMS was then the child bearing them food amidst the Nazis. Yet, when Santilli was at Harvard and refused to obey our orders, we behaved in a way now condemned in history (RMS, Il Grande Grido, 1984). Your action in these pages, combined with all this past history, has caused a international waves of attacks against us, including attacks at the U. S. Congress for abusing billions of taxpayers money to maintain our control of science under Einstein’s name, all the way to attacks on our control of the Nobel Foundation for orchestrating the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics on the acceleration of the expansion of the universe when it had been already disproved experimentally by Santill, see scientificethics(.)org(/)First-2012-Nobel-Nomin(.)html

It is time for you, Arthur Rubin, and your known controllers to let go and leave he editing of Santilli’s pages to more equitable and less fanatic people. Santilli’s mathematical, physical and chemical theories are now known the world over because they are the only scientific novelty out there. Hence the growing attacks against us for our 30 years of obstructions and discriminations you cannot dub “anti-Semitic” because fully justified, unless you consider yourself a superior being. Let it be clear that not all of us support the aim set forth by you and your associates of recreating in America today the control of Germany we had in the early 1900. The consequences of the hatred we created against us by all Germans for our abuses of their country are sadly known. I pray not to be alive when Americans will respond to a similar scheme in the U.S.A. particularly when combining the damage to America by our control of science and of the Federal Reserve as well as the number of American deaths caused by our stand in Palestine. Goodbye Rubin and associates. May God save our people from your wrongdoings. NewWorriedLad (post screened in the expectation of quick trashing).

I understand the RMS paper I quoted came out very recently. You confirm the attacks against us since you imply that Misplaced Pages is not free, especially now with all the fuzz going on on the lack of expansion of the universe. Have you seen The Wall Street Journal?

http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130610-903915.html I assume you receive Google Alerts on this, know how many similar news releases on RMS are now out there and expect furtehr damage from your long record. NewWorriedLad — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewWorriedLad (talk • contribs) 22:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

I see you are unable to comprehend WP:COI, as well as how to write URLs. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

And that last source was a press release; the WSJ disclaims responsibility for the content. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

• Biography articles of living people
• All unassessed articles
• Start-Class biography articles
• Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
• Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
• Science and academia work group articles
• Misplaced Pages requested photographs of scientists and academics
• Misplaced Pages requested photographs of people
• WikiProject Biography articles
• Start-Class physics articles
• Low-importance physics articles
• Start-Class physics articles of Low-importance
• Start-Class physics biographies articles
• Physics biographies articles
• Start-Class Alternative views articles
• Low-importance Alternative views articles
• WikiProject Alternative views articles
• Start-Class Chemistry articles
• Low-importance Chemistry articles
• WikiProject Chemistry articles