| Revision as of 20:42, 15 July 2013 editUnited States Man (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,235 edits →July 2013: final warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:44, 15 July 2013 edit undoCyclonebiskit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators61,691 edits →2013 El Reno tornado: please do not continue that course of actionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Regards, ] (]) 20:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | Regards, ] (]) 20:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Before you continue to revert edits on the article, please understand that continued action in this manner could result in your being temporarily blocked in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ]. Instead, it is more appropriate to discuss the situation here as I have attempted to do with the above post. I would greatly appreciate your cooperation. ] (]) 20:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:44, 15 July 2013
July 2013
Hello, I'm United States Man. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2013 El Reno tornado because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! United States Man (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at 2013 El Reno tornado, you may be blocked from editing. United States Man (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. United States Man (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
2013 El Reno tornado
Hey there and welcome to Misplaced Pages.
I saw your recent edit to the 2013 El Reno tornado article, including a revert of United States Man (talk · contribs); however, your edits appeared to be nonconstructive as they broke syntax (removing the first level header for the section titled "Casualties and Impact"). Additionally, though the information is valid, the context is confusing. You led it off with "however" but no contrasting statement to the information in the preceding paragraph was given.
Regards, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Before you continue to revert edits on the article, please understand that continued action in this manner could result in your being temporarily blocked in accordance with Misplaced Pages's three revert rule. Instead, it is more appropriate to discuss the situation here as I have attempted to do with the above post. I would greatly appreciate your cooperation. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)