Revision as of 02:43, 3 August 2013 view sourceAmaury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers98,545 editsm Archiving July.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:58, 3 August 2013 view source Edgth (talk | contribs)226 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
Hi, I´m wondering if you can revert youself on that page. You see the discussion and consensus is on the talk page of the article and it resulted in the edit that I implemented. Thanks. ] (]) 02:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | Hi, I´m wondering if you can revert youself on that page. You see the discussion and consensus is on the talk page of the article and it resulted in the edit that I implemented. Thanks. ] (]) 02:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Although it wasn´t your intention to get involved in a big coffufle, if you want to read the long and boring talk page discussion, the consensus was for the edit that I implemented. Let me know if you´re self reverting or not. Thanks. ] (]) 02:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Hi Amaury. I will report this editor again for edit-warring. No worries. ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 02:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | Hi Amaury. I will report this editor again for edit-warring. No worries. ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 02:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:58, 3 August 2013
It is approximately 4:57 PM where this user lives. |
I screwed up, just to say hello, or anything else! I won't bite! I have a few requests that I hope you'll respect while posting here:
|
Archives |
---|
2009 |
2010 |
2012 |
2013 |
August 2013
Homeoprophylaxis
Hello Amaury Re Homeoprophylaxis. I am a new writer and I had first written the doc in my sandbox complete with references so I thought it would be great o publish it. I cut and pasted into the article window. however What I published did not show the references linked up so I wasn't sure how it worked. It was late at night and I thought better to remove the content rather than have the references not linked. I was going to get back with it this weekend to see what I could do about it. I just searched and it is being redirected back to homeopathy so I am not even sure the page is there. or perhaps it is in review? Also there seems to be someone who wants to delete the page from my sandbox. I made a comment in response but am not sure if it will make a difference. any advice would be helpful thank you Kate Katebhom (talk) 00:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Mythology
Hi, I´m wondering if you can revert youself on that page. You see the discussion and consensus is on the talk page of the article and it resulted in the edit that I implemented. Thanks. Edgth (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
- Although it wasn´t your intention to get involved in a big coffufle, if you want to read the long and boring talk page discussion, the consensus was for the edit that I implemented. Let me know if you´re self reverting or not. Thanks. Edgth (talk) 02:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Amaury. I will report this editor again for edit-warring. No worries. Δρ.Κ. 02:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)