| Revision as of 05:21, 25 October 2013 editNumbermaniac (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers17,932 edits →Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropes vs. Women in Video Games (October 24): I made this error.← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:14, 31 October 2013 edit undoCuchullain (talk | contribs)Administrators83,895 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
| Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages! | Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages! | ||
| ] (]) 08:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | ] (]) 08:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | ||
| ==October 2013== | |||
| I've refactored your recent post at ]. Per the ] policy and the ], article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article, not for expressing personal opinions on the subject. Is is especially inappropriate to engage in personal opinions regarding a ]. In the future, please keep all your talk page posts tied to specific and actionable article improvements. Violating the policies repeatedly will be considered disruptive and may lead to you being blocked or banned from editing. Thanks,--] ]/] 14:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:14, 31 October 2013
Welcome!
Hello, Nosepea68, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Diego (talk) 09:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Be careful at talk pages
Please be careful with other people's comments when editing talk pages. You have removed with this edit the comment I posted after your commentary at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. Diego (talk) 13:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. NeilN 16:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Talk pages again
Can you please read Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines. You're still not signing your posts properly and now you're top posting and adding incorrect templates. --NeilN 19:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sure
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
|
Hi Nosepea68! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
October 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Anita Sarkeesian. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Your deliberate falsifying of a title of a source is particularly disruptive. NeilN 00:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Anita Sarkeesian. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anita Sarkeesian. ///EuroCarGT 00:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Anita Sarkeesian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Cúchullain /c 00:11, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
--Orange Mike | Talk 00:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
For fucks sake,
I am a n00b I admit, reason I flagged all Anita Sarkeesian parts was because I thought that is how to do it. I sincerely did not know my editing every single part (that a proper saying?) was counted as spam. Seriously I thought that after editing a part you must save them for later use.
Obviously that wasn't the case.
After all. I would like to have OrangeMike's Skype handle so I could discus this matter more closely or I can PM him with mine to continue this conversation.
- Why did you falsify the title of a source? Why did you stop only after you were blocked and not before and ask questions as to why you were being reverted? --NeilN 01:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- If I remember correctly (you know no normal human memory is perfect), I had several tabs open in firefox and refreshed the main article every now and then to see my edits appearance and I was sleep depraved when I was editing the article. I wanted to POV the article because all the criticism against Sarkeesian's work is refuted as no reliable sources and to me (subjective view, yes!) it seems the article is glorifying Anita Sarkeesian showing only her "misogynistic" harassment. Actually the backlash she got wasn't against females per se but against her as a person.
Your submission at AfC Tropes vs. Women in Video Games was accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)October 2013
I've refactored your recent post at Talk:Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. Per the WP:NOTAFORUM policy and the talk page guidelines, article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article, not for expressing personal opinions on the subject. Is is especially inappropriate to engage in personal opinions regarding a living person. In the future, please keep all your talk page posts tied to specific and actionable article improvements. Violating the policies repeatedly will be considered disruptive and may lead to you being blocked or banned from editing. Thanks,--Cúchullain /c 14:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)