Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:05, 2 September 2013 editKing of Hearts (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators68,834 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto/Archive← Previous edit Revision as of 23:53, 31 October 2013 edit undoGaramond Lethe (talk | contribs)5,094 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{SPIarchive notice|DeFacto}} {{SPIarchive notice|DeFacto}}
{{SPIpriorcases}} {{SPIpriorcases}}


=====<big>31 October 2013</big>=====
{{SPI case status|}}

;Suspected sockpuppets

* {{checkuser|1=EzEdit}}
* {{checkuser|1=Credibility gap}}


<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>
*

EzEdit: New user (Registered 7/13/2013; 131 edits;), began almost immediately interacting with ] on a template page and elsewhere . Article space edits are all measurement related and tend towards tendentious .

Credibility gap: New user (Registered 1/10/2013; 50 edits;), began almost immediately editing at ] then to ]'s just-GA'd ] . Edits have tended towards tendentious.

I don't expect a CU to be useful; Defacto has done this often enough to know what s/he is doing. In this case, I think behavioral evidence suffices. <small><span style="color:gray"><tt>]<span style="display:inline-block;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1em">]<br/>]</span></tt></span></small> 23:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======


----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 23:53, 31 October 2013

DeFacto

DeFacto (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto/Archive.



31 October 2013

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


EzEdit: New user (Registered 7/13/2013; 131 edits;), began almost immediately interacting with Martinvl on a template page and elsewhere . Article space edits are all measurement related and tend towards tendentious .

Credibility gap: New user (Registered 1/10/2013; 50 edits;), began almost immediately editing at WP:MOSNUM then to User:Martinvl's just-GA'd History of the metric system . Edits have tended towards tendentious.

I don't expect a CU to be useful; Defacto has done this often enough to know what s/he is doing. In this case, I think behavioral evidence suffices. Garamond Lethet
c 23:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto: Difference between revisions Add topic