| Revision as of 11:01, 7 November 2013 edit67.255.123.1 (talk) →Bishop of Rochester: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:56, 7 November 2013 edit undoLTblb (talk | contribs)373 edits →Harassment: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
| You are misguided about the application of WP:CRYSTAL for the next Bishop of Rochester. WP:CRYSTAL is unambiguous: Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and ''almost certain to take place''. (emphasis mine). It is all but certain that Bishop Salvatore will take up his post in Rochester in January, consequently Misplaced Pages should include the information. In those discussions that you list someone made the comparison to the President-elect. This one is valid, and of course after the Presidential election Misplaced Pages would include who is going to be the next President, even though they have not taken office yet. Anything else would be silly. ] (]) 11:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | You are misguided about the application of WP:CRYSTAL for the next Bishop of Rochester. WP:CRYSTAL is unambiguous: Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and ''almost certain to take place''. (emphasis mine). It is all but certain that Bishop Salvatore will take up his post in Rochester in January, consequently Misplaced Pages should include the information. In those discussions that you list someone made the comparison to the President-elect. This one is valid, and of course after the Presidential election Misplaced Pages would include who is going to be the next President, even though they have not taken office yet. Anything else would be silly. ] (]) 11:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Harassment == | |||
| If you continue chasing my edits indiscriminately and without any argument, and , I will accuse to you of ]. --] (]) 11:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:56, 7 November 2013
Appointment of Catholic Bishops
- If you have come to my talk page regarding a recent appointment of a Catholic bishop to a new diocese, please read all of the previous discussions before reverting me, or telling me that I am wrong, or opening new discussion on the matter.
- Talk:Charles J. Chaput#The info box.
- Talk:Samuel J. Aquila#Appointment to new diocese
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism/Archive_2012#Episcopal appointments and WP:CRYSTAL
- Talk:Salvatore J. Cordileone#Bishop of Oakland until his installation date
- Talk:Mario Poli#Catholic bishops do not change their see until installation
- Thank you for your concern!
 Archives | |||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Talkback
Message added 23:37, 22 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Chris (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
GOCE Blitz wrap-up; join us for the November drive
Guild of Copy Editors October Blitz wrap-up
Participation: Out of eleven people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we copy edited 42 articles from WikiProject Film's backlog, reducing it by a net of 34 articles. Hope to see you at the November drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest and Torchiest, Baffle gab1978 and Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the November drive!To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:57, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
User:108.29.178.254
They had only received one warning. If they continue edit disruptively, please report back to me or AIV. They seem to have a content concern, not simply pure vandalism. John Reaves 00:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- This is an IP-hopping, edit-warring vandal WP:SPA who has exhibited extreme anti-Semitic tendences. He has been warned and blocked at User talk:69.119.172.23 User talk:61.200.81.168 User talk:108.174.195.211 User talk:74.101.159.110 and User talk:71.167.39.19. He is the reason the page now has WP:Pending changes protection. This is a long-term abuse issue. Elizium23 (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, I was unaware. I've blocked them. John Reaves 00:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Catching fire edit
You reverted my edit on catching fire when I changed the plot to synopsis, but it makes more sense for it to be the synopsis since the plot is the whole story and the synopsis is the summary of what will happen since the film hasn't been released yet. Calling it synopsis also will help readers since when I first saw it was plot I thought it would have spoilers. (Rhinomantis88 (talk) 10:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC))
- That's fine. I just thought that "Plot" was more standard across the WikiProject but you have made an excellent point. I think you are right. Elizium23 (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Disruptive
Re your comment on removal of the Famous_for_being_famous samples I added: no block-from-editing threat is needed. I dare say this was an exception. Kind regards. Havanafreestone (talk) 21:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps I set the warning level too high, but I am curious why such phrasing was chosen for the lines on Ray J and Lauren Conrad, was that kind of commentary and tone necessary in an encyclopedic article? Elizium23 (talk) 21:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- You're right, that commentary and tone were not necessary, I got carried away by my laughter while typing. Thanks.Havanafreestone (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
New user for WikiProject United States
Hi, this is not intended to be spam, so I hope you don't interpret it as such. I am a new user on Misplaced Pages and would like to become more involved in the WikiProject United States. I noticed that you are listed as an active member and was wondering if you could be of assistance? I'm unsure of communication etiquette, but figured I would just ask. Is posting on a user talk page for personal help like this acceptable? And regardless, where/who can I talk to about how to be of assistance to the previously mentioned WikiProject.
I would appreciate any help and thank you so much for your time. Again, apologies if this is poor etiquette.
--ElliotSchmelliot (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your interest. I am not particularly involved in that WikiProject, but I can point you to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject United States. This would be the best place for you to post and ask where you can help out. Best of luck. Elizium23 (talk) 04:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Salvation Army UK
I don't understand why you have removed my page edit for the Salvation Army. Which part, specifically, do you require a source for? Are you asking for a source to back up claims that the Salvation Army is involved in Workfare? Alternatively, are you looking for a reliable source for the claim that Workfare does not improve the chances of someone finding work? I provided a source for that claim, which is a report from the UK Department of Work and Pensions. This is a government report. I would really appreciate it if you could be more specifically with what the issue is here. Thanks. Ttosca (talk) 09:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- The link you provided was to the Boycott Workfare website, which is not a third-party source. If you have a link to the report of the DWP then that is useful but it is still a primary source; you are not permitted to perform any analysis or commentary that is not found in third-party sources. You will need reliable secondary sources to support all the claims you make in the article. For example, news stories in newspapers or magazines. Elizium23 (talk) 18:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Bishop of Rochester
You are misguided about the application of WP:CRYSTAL for the next Bishop of Rochester. WP:CRYSTAL is unambiguous: Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. (emphasis mine). It is all but certain that Bishop Salvatore will take up his post in Rochester in January, consequently Misplaced Pages should include the information. In those discussions that you list someone made the comparison to the President-elect. This one is valid, and of course after the Presidential election Misplaced Pages would include who is going to be the next President, even though they have not taken office yet. Anything else would be silly. 67.255.123.1 (talk) 11:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Harassment
If you continue chasing my edits indiscriminately and without any argument, and flooding my discuss page with false accusations, I will accuse to you of Harassment. --LTblb (talk) 11:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)