Revision as of 04:56, 13 June 2006 view sourceRjensen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers227,349 edits tweak details 1890s← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:11, 13 June 2006 view source 4.153.8.28 (talk) removing some POV, attempting to more narrowly define and interrelate termsNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''Yellow journalism''''' is pejorative reference to ] featuring scandal-mongering ] or other unethical or unprofessional practices by ] organizations or individual journalists. More enlightened ] generally considers such behavior beneath its ]. However, the term is used more loosely by media critics, from officials who come under watchdog journalists' scrutiny (for good reason or not), to ] ], or simply readers who find a particular story or photograph offensive or controversial. (See also ] and ].) | |||
The term typically refers to ] in news reporting that bears only a superficial resemblance to the profession of journalism. | |||
The term "]" was coined to refer to ] that blends journalism and entertainment in a way which, critics argue, diminishes the ] and professionalism of the reporting. | |||
The gentler pejorative "]" was coined more recently to refer to generally inoffensive ] that shuns serious controversies, but blends "soft" journalism and entertainment rather than emphasizing more important ]. | |||
The phrase "]" is a related term which is used in political rhetoric to assert a broad political bias within news media organizations. Its common usage derives from news media ] where an organization's functionaries and personalities tend to direct discussion away from issues in professional journalism to issues in politics. | |||
'']'' is another recent pejorative for news conglomerates whose business interests, critics say, supersede the public interest. For example, such media may avoid incisive reporting on influential corporations or government regulation of media industries. Collusion between political, business and media worlds sometimes brings allegations of illegal or unethical practices ranging from ] to ] violations. | |||
== Meaning == | |||
The term, as it commonly applies, refers to news organizations for whom ], ], and in some cases ] and ], take dominance over factual reporting. Most cases tend to be related to ], and the endemic practices of particular organizations to operate as mouthpieces, for rather limited and particular allegiances, rather than for the ]. | |||
While both bland infotainment and unethical corporate media practices may be considered "yellow" in the sense of "cowardly," the term ''yellow journalism'' more commonly refers to news organizations for whom some combination of ], ], ], ] or ], takes dominance over factual reporting in betrayal of the profession's ]. | |||
Recent accusations of yellow journalism center around media ] and ], referring to organizations where business interests supersede the interests of news organizations to accurately report damaging facts about influential corporations and common practices within corporate industry. In certain cases, the links between political, business, and media worlds, are alleged to violate various laws ranging from ] to ]. | |||
In the modern context of near-instant television news coverage |
In the modern context of near-instant television news coverage and ] name-calling, careless fact-checking for the sake of a ] story might be referred to as ''yellow journalism.'' Others may use the term to condemn a range of perceived ills from sporadic use of unnecessarily colorful ]s, up to a systematic tendency to report falsehoods as fact. | ||
⚫ | == History: The Yellow Press == | ||
⚫ | ==Currency== | ||
⚫ | The term has largely fallen into disuse as the media world has grown both in scope and in complexity. Further, because most media outlets have cultural allegiances or business practices that to one degree or other force them to deviate from idealized concepts of reporting, accusations of "yellow journalism" tend to be few. | ||
⚫ | Print journalists have tended toward building a career ] of consistent and thorough professionalism, to gain respect and prominence. ], for example, may be chosen not for their skills at journalism, but rather for their presentation, appearance, and personality. | ||
⚫ | A current perceived rift is therefore more akin to a segmentation according to definitions of "news." The public still attaches to "news" the ]s of "journalism." Because of these developments, the common definition of "]" no longer belongs in the domain of journalists, but to wider television and internet media outlets over a vast spectrum of target issues and audiences. The proliferation of web media has in a certain sense re-validated journalistic ethics: reports that conform best tend to be treated as more authoritative. "]" organizations draw general audiences, who tend to fall into ] that each favor particular blends of issues-based entertainment along with their "news." | ||
⚫ | Reputation and ethics do not necessarily coincide at all times. Well-established institutions such as the '']'' can be at fault. Many journalists find conflicts between their employment and their professionalism as journalists. | ||
⚫ | == The Yellow |
||
] | ] | ||
Line 40: | Line 27: | ||
== In fiction == | == In fiction == | ||
In many ]s, ]s and other works of ], reporters often use yellow journalism against the main character, which typically works to set up the reporter character as an ]. Likewise, in the ] ] movie ], an evil media magnate tries to start a war between ] and ] via sensationalized news stories; in the movie, the villain even alludes to Hearst's role in the Spanish-American War. In Thomas Harris's novel ''],'' from the ] series, a sleazy yellow journalist named ], who writes for the ''National Tattler'' tabloid, is tortured and set aflame for penning a negative article about serial killer ]. | In many ]s, ]s and other works of ], reporters often use yellow journalism against the main character, which typically works to set up the reporter character as an ]. Likewise, in the ] ] movie ], an evil media magnate tries to start a war between ] and ] via sensationalized news stories; in the movie, the villain even alludes to Hearst's role in the Spanish-American War. In Thomas Harris's novel ''],'' from the ] series, a sleazy yellow journalist named ], who writes for the ''National Tattler'' tabloid, is tortured and set aflame for penning a negative article about serial killer ]. | ||
⚫ | ==Currency== | ||
⚫ | The term has largely fallen into disuse as the media world has grown both in scope and in complexity. Further, because most media outlets have cultural allegiances or business practices that to one degree or other force them to deviate from idealized concepts of reporting, accusations of "yellow journalism" tend to be few. | ||
⚫ | Print journalists have tended toward building a career ] of consistent and thorough professionalism, to gain respect and prominence. ], for example, may be chosen not for their skills at journalism, but rather for their presentation, appearance, and personality. | ||
⚫ | A current perceived rift is therefore more akin to a segmentation according to definitions of "news." The public still attaches to "news" the ]s of "journalism." Because of these developments, the common definition of "]" no longer belongs in the domain of journalists, but to wider television and internet media outlets over a vast spectrum of target issues and audiences. The proliferation of web media has in a certain sense re-validated journalistic ethics: reports that conform best tend to be treated as more authoritative. "]" organizations draw general audiences, who tend to fall into ] that each favor particular blends of issues-based entertainment along with their "news." | ||
⚫ | Reputation and ethics do not necessarily coincide at all times. Well-established institutions such as the '']'' can be at fault. Many journalists find conflicts between their employment and their professionalism as journalists. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== |
Revision as of 05:11, 13 June 2006
Yellow journalism is pejorative reference to journalism featuring scandal-mongering sensationalism or other unethical or unprofessional practices by news media organizations or individual journalists. More enlightened journalistic professionalism generally considers such behavior beneath its principles. However, the term is used more loosely by media critics, from officials who come under watchdog journalists' scrutiny (for good reason or not), to public relations spin doctors, or simply readers who find a particular story or photograph offensive or controversial. (See also media bias and talk shows.)
The gentler pejorative "infotainment" was coined more recently to refer to generally inoffensive news programming that shuns serious controversies, but blends "soft" journalism and entertainment rather than emphasizing more important news values.
Corporate media is another recent pejorative for news conglomerates whose business interests, critics say, supersede the public interest. For example, such media may avoid incisive reporting on influential corporations or government regulation of media industries. Collusion between political, business and media worlds sometimes brings allegations of illegal or unethical practices ranging from fraud to antitrust violations.
While both bland infotainment and unethical corporate media practices may be considered "yellow" in the sense of "cowardly," the term yellow journalism more commonly refers to news organizations for whom some combination of sensationalism, profiteering, propaganda, journalistic bias or jingoism, takes dominance over factual reporting in betrayal of the profession's public trust.
In the modern context of near-instant television news coverage and talk show name-calling, careless fact-checking for the sake of a breaking news story might be referred to as yellow journalism. Others may use the term to condemn a range of perceived ills from sporadic use of unnecessarily colorful adjectives, up to a systematic tendency to report falsehoods as fact.
History: The Yellow Press
Metropolitan newspapersstarted going after department store advertising in the 1890s, and discovered the larger circulation base the better. The most famous rivalry was in New York City, where stunts and sensationalism were led by Joseph Pulitzer of the New York World and William Randolph Hearst of the New York Journal. They seem to have equated the sensational reporting of murders, gory accidents, and the like, with the need of the democratic common man to be entertained by subjects beyond dry politics. Their entertainment features also included the first color comic strip comics pages. "Yellow journalism," although born earlier, apparently acquired a name when Pulitzer's New York World and Hearst's New York Journal American' warred over ownership of a cartoon character, The Yellow Kid, who appeared in both these papers in the mid-to-late 1890s. The use of "yellow journalism" as a synonym for over-the-top sensationalism in the U.S. apparently started with this battle of "the Yellow Kid papers." (See also symbolism of yellow.)
Hearst
While most early newspapers tended toward expressing a viewpoint, the prototypical example of yellow journalism was the late 19th century Hearst Newspapers' consistent emphasis on episodes showing a humanitarian crisis among Cubans at the hands of Spanish troops. The Spanish denied the crisis and said Hearst was lying. The stories, combining both a sense of urgency and moral outrage, and Hearst directed his one newspaper, the New York Journal.
Having contributed to rallying public support for the cause for war, Hearst tried to influence the political vote as well. Along with the destruction of the USS Maine, this reporting sparked a public outcry that led to the US to start the Spanish-American War. James Creelman praised the work of the reporters for exposing the horrors of Spanish misrule, arguing, " no true history of the war . . . can be written without an acknowledgment that whatever of justice and freedom and progress was accomplished by the Spanish-American war was due to the enterprise and tenacity of yellow journalists, many of whom lie in unremembered graves." Journalism historians have noted that in 1898 yellow journalism was largely confined to New York City, and that newspapers in the rest of the country did not follow their lead. The key Yellow newspapers, the New York Journal and the World, were not among the top ten sources of news in regional papers. The stories simply did not make a splash outside Gotham.
Americans would soon find themselves invading, occupying, and taking over control of both Cuba and the Philippines from Spain, and Hearst found himself more influential--but he lost much of his personal prestige when one of his columnists, Ambrose Bierce recommended the assassination of President McKinley seven months before he was indeed assassinated.
In fiction
In many movies, sitcoms and other works of fiction, reporters often use yellow journalism against the main character, which typically works to set up the reporter character as an antagonist. Likewise, in the 1997 James Bond movie Tomorrow Never Dies, an evil media magnate tries to start a war between Great Britain and China via sensationalized news stories; in the movie, the villain even alludes to Hearst's role in the Spanish-American War. In Thomas Harris's novel Red Dragon, from the Hannibal Lecter series, a sleazy yellow journalist named Freddy Lounds, who writes for the National Tattler tabloid, is tortured and set aflame for penning a negative article about serial killer Francis Dolarhyde.
Currency
The term has largely fallen into disuse as the media world has grown both in scope and in complexity. Further, because most media outlets have cultural allegiances or business practices that to one degree or other force them to deviate from idealized concepts of reporting, accusations of "yellow journalism" tend to be few.
Print journalists have tended toward building a career reputation of consistent and thorough professionalism, to gain respect and prominence. News anchors, for example, may be chosen not for their skills at journalism, but rather for their presentation, appearance, and personality.
A current perceived rift is therefore more akin to a segmentation according to definitions of "news." The public still attaches to "news" the connotations of "journalism." Because of these developments, the common definition of "news" no longer belongs in the domain of journalists, but to wider television and internet media outlets over a vast spectrum of target issues and audiences. The proliferation of web media has in a certain sense re-validated journalistic ethics: reports that conform best tend to be treated as more authoritative. "Pseudo-news" organizations draw general audiences, who tend to fall into market demographics that each favor particular blends of issues-based entertainment along with their "news."
Reputation and ethics do not necessarily coincide at all times. Well-established institutions such as the New York Times can be at fault. Many journalists find conflicts between their employment and their professionalism as journalists.
See also
References
- George W. Auxier, "Middle Western Newspapers and the Spanish American War, 1895-1898," Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 26 (March 1940):
- Procter, Ben. William Randolph Hearst: The Early Years, 1863-1910 (1998)
- Morton M. Rosenberg and Thomas P. Ruff, Indiana and the Coming of the Spanish-American War, Ball State Monograph, No. 26, Publications in History, No. 4 (Muncie: Ball State University, 1976) who say Indiana papers were "more moderate, more cautious, less imperialistic and less jingoistic than their eastern counterparts."
- W. David Sloan and James D. Startt, The Gilded Age Press, 1865-1900 (2003)
- Harold J. Sylvester, “The Kansas Press and the Coming of the Spanish-American War, ” The Historian, 31 (February 1969) finds no Yellow journalism influence on the newspapers in Kansas.
- Mark M. Welter, "The 1895-1898 Cuban Crisis in Minnesota Newspapers: Testing the 'Yellow Journalism' Theory," Journalism Quarterly, 47 (Winter 1970): 719—24.
External links
- Not likely sent: The Remington-Hearst 'telegrams' from W. Joseph Campbell's web site.