Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:24, 24 December 2013

Archives

Please comment on Talk:Claude Monet

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Claude Monet. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Articles

Biophily I am guessing that you have reevaluated your attitude on some things now because of feedback received. I do think you could back track with your AFD thing suggestion as I think you acted out of anger or frustration. Jose Antonio Pineda may not be a household name but few poets are especially in the U.S. area. He has written a couple of books, and they are not self published but were published by publishing houses. He has a long history of performing in many areas of the world. I think its a pity if you maintain the very negative aspect of "trailing, peoples edits. Earl King Jr. (talk) 23:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Didn't intend to trail it, just noticed it when examining your history with the Fresco article. I would say he is still not notable enough by Misplaced Pages's standards. But honestly I don't feel like handling the AfD.--Biophily (talk) 02:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Bad answer, but its your answer. I do think now that being topic banned from the Fresco related things is in order because I have run out of patience now with your kind of editing. Stalking other editors is pretty low. Earl King Jr. (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

It's not stalking when you are trying to figure out a pattern of edits.

I don't know why that is a bad answer. I don't see how whether I said the guy is notable or not should make a difference in whether you think I should be topic banned.

And what are you talking about, that was a while ago. And I haven't touched the Fresco article for a week. Why are you bringing this up now?--Biophily (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

By the way, did you not deliberately stock me on the internet? Let's not forget that. At least I noticed the Pineda article only in passing. It wasn't my aim. You on the other hand deliberately set out to invade my privacy.--Biophily (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

No, you are a public persona adjunct to Fresco and his organization and a part of Fresco's information on the internet. My idea is not whether you think the poet notable, it is a compilation of your tendentious editing, circular abstracted thinking about how you perceive the article and nasty negative attitude toward other editors and accusations of conspiracy or secret agenda against others on the article.

The stalking you have done on other article is just another aspect. Earl King Jr. (talk) 22:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Pay attention to my comment on the Fresco talk page. The reference to conspiracy was about YOU speculating about Fresco conspiring to promote himself by various means. We can't verify any of that so it shouldn't be used as reasoning on the talk page.

The fact is, your stalking of me is far worse. I reviewed your history of edits on Fresco because I also believed you exercised abuses. That is a legitimate reason.--Biophily (talk) 22:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Yeah that is the problem. Exercised abuses? Even with the new editors saying that is not the case it is your rational. Earl King Jr. (talk) 00:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

They are not familiar with the deep history of your relation to the article. Moving on.--Biophily (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Warning It is never appropriate to attack other editors on Misplaced Pages discuss issues in articles without name calling or resorting to tendentious personality issues and conflicts You somehow got Bobrayner to do your third revert for you, which is getting suspicious has hell considering the fact that somehow he keeps a close enough eye on the article to participate only to do your third revert, every time, yet won't even respond to my questions about the Fresco article on his talk page. end quote Biophily from the page. Earl King Jr. (talk) 16:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Personal attack? There are patterns that warrant suspicion. Any reasonable person would notice the peculiar pattern and have a thought.--Biophily (talk) 17:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Marriage

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Marriage. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)