| Revision as of 16:31, 29 January 2014 editMsnicki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,358 edits →About your Deletions: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:32, 29 January 2014 edit undoMsnicki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,358 edits →Conversation move: rm closed item. discussion has moved back to the article talk page.Next edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Your one of the best debaters I have seen in some time. I have great respect for you my new friend. ] (]) 20:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Your one of the best debaters I have seen in some time. I have great respect for you my new friend. ] (]) 20:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == Conversation move == | |||
| Would you be ok if I move the last debating round down to the Discussion section? We could title it "Comments on sources" - what do you think..as its taking up lost of space in the servay section ? -- ] (]) 17:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC) dame my typos..speech to text suck sometimes :- ) | |||
| :No. You should start a new section proposing the specific content change you seek, requesting consensus in support of it. I don't think you'll get it. ] (]) 17:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::What?? i am talking about the current conversation on the talk page...the content your referring to is already in the article... I am taking about move the current conversation in the survey section down to discussion section. -- ] (]) 17:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::You appear to be proposing a content change. Currently, the article indicates that marijuana and cannabis are basically interchangeable terms but you appear to disagree. What is it you want? Tell us. That should not be a difficult request. ] (]) 18:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You seem to misunderstand alot man. The article is fine no need for a change in content its all explained in the article...what i am taking about is the conversation on the talk page... we should move it to the proper section...the one titled discussion over where it is now. | |||
| ::::::If indeed you are fine with the content, then live with it and accept it. The article says cannabis and marijuana are basically interchangeable terms. You've been claiming they're different. Which is it? I hope you're not saying, "Well, I'm only claiming they're different so I can block the move. Once that's accomplished, I'm totally okay agreeing they're the same." But I'm getting that sense. What I suspect is actually going on is that you also know perfectly well that about all you could possibly get is a sentence that acknowledges that some sources distinguish hash from both marijuana and cannabis. And that doesn't help you block the move. So you'd like to have it both ways. You'd like to pretend this is a serious issue and you'd like to keep it alive. You know that if you actually proposed a change saying marijuana and cannabis are different, it would never be accepted and then your argument would be dead. That's why you're afraid to put it out there as an actual content change proposal. ] (]) 01:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == About your Deletions == | == About your Deletions == | ||
Revision as of 16:32, 29 January 2014
|
The Editor's Barnstar | |
| for being so clear eyed, consistent, and even in tone while working on the whole Deluna page/umpteen socks investigation. Good work!Tao2911 (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
My goodness. Thank you. Msnicki (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| For keeping peace and letting everybody use their opportunities. APS (Full Auto) (talk) 22:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you! Msnicki (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
| Your one of the best debaters I have seen in some time. I have great respect for you my new friend. Moxy (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC) |
About your Deletions
You told me that I need to Write the Article first........ IT WAS WRITEN BUT YOU DELETED IT!
Thanks for beeing so ""hospitable"" with newbies..................... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alina Citea (talk • contribs) 06:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- New entries added to either List of programming languages and List of programmers should be supported by an article that establishes the notability of the language or the individual. But it's not sufficient simply to create an article and call it done. The article must contain evidence that the topic meets our notability standards at WP:GNG, which requires that multiple reliable independent secondary sources have discussed the topic. You can't just create your own WP:Autobiography with the only citations being to some wikis you've created and expect that to be accepted here. Msnicki (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)