Revision as of 12:34, 7 February 2014 editGiantSnowman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators602,020 edits →Infobox: useful← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:38, 7 February 2014 edit undoSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers113,553 edits →InfoboxNext edit → | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:::*Why bother? There's no pressing need, and it's not overly helpful, given the fullness of the lead. There is certainly no requirement to have one, and the consensus was not to include one here. ] (]) 12:29, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | :::*Why bother? There's no pressing need, and it's not overly helpful, given the fullness of the lead. There is certainly no requirement to have one, and the consensus was not to include one here. ] (]) 12:29, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::*I just find them ''extremely'' useful. ]] 12:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | ::::*I just find them ''extremely'' useful. ]] 12:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::*Useful in repeating what can be found by shifting your eyes a little to the left? I've heard others say they find them hugely distracting, so it's really not possible to please all the people all the time. - ] (]) 12:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Blue plaques == | == Blue plaques == |
Revision as of 12:38, 7 February 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hattie Jacques article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Hattie Jacques is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 7, 2014. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hattie Jacques article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Infobox
Hi, I'm new here and was wondering why this article doesn't have an infobox. It's one of the first big articles I've seen that doesn't have one. It's a great informative article though. Thanks for putting it on the front page. Simonfreeman (talk) 02:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Simon, There's no need or requirement for articles to have an infobox in any article, and this question was looked at carefully when this had a recent overhaul. There are a lot of articles (and some very, very good ones too) that have not adopted the IB for various reasons, and this follows that practice. I'm glad you enjoyed the article - it was fun to write! - SchroCat (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Is there any reason why we cannot introduce an infobox? GiantSnowman 12:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Why bother? There's no pressing need, and it's not overly helpful, given the fullness of the lead. There is certainly no requirement to have one, and the consensus was not to include one here. SchroCat (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- I just find them extremely useful. GiantSnowman 12:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Useful in repeating what can be found by shifting your eyes a little to the left? I've heard others say they find them hugely distracting, so it's really not possible to please all the people all the time. - SchroCat (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Blue plaques
Noting that the Sandgate blue plaque has Hattie born in 1922 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgFbjizF6uY), but the one used in the article has 1924, perhaps a footnote would work well to indicate why so many sources differ on her year of birth? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Crisco, I had a quick look when we did the recent overhaul, but couldn't find out where the original mistake had come from, or why it had gained so much traction. Most of the major sources (main biographies, DNB, etc,) and now us, all show the date on the birth certificate as being the correct one. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for the clarification. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- A connected query is: why is there a picture of a blue plaque on the main page, rather than a picture of Hattie herself? I'm assuming it's a very deliberate choice? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yes: there is no free use image that we came across of the lady herself, so both images of her are non-free. The plaque is free, so we're able to drop it onto the front page. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- A connected query is: why is there a picture of a blue plaque on the main page, rather than a picture of Hattie herself? I'm assuming it's a very deliberate choice? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Mid-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class Comedy articles
- Unknown-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- FA-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles