| Revision as of 17:01, 25 July 2013 editNewprogressive (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,528 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:17, 9 February 2014 edit undoWaacstats (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,348,587 edits →References: Add persondata short description using AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| | NAME = May, John | | NAME = May, John | ||
| | ALTERNATIVE NAMES = | | ALTERNATIVE NAMES = | ||
| | SHORT DESCRIPTION = | | SHORT DESCRIPTION = British judge | ||
| | DATE OF BIRTH = | | DATE OF BIRTH = | ||
| | PLACE OF BIRTH = | | PLACE OF BIRTH = | ||
Revision as of 17:17, 9 February 2014
Sir John May was a former Court of Appeal judge appointed by the British Government to investigate the miscarriages of justice related to the Maguire Seven and other miscarriages linked to IRA bombing offences. He was educated at Clifton College.
On 20 October 1989 following the quashing of the Guildford Four convictions, May was appointed to chair an inquiry into both that case and the related case of the Maguire Seven. On 12 July 1990, the Home Secretary David Waddington published the interim report, Interim Report on the Maguire Case : The Inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the convictions arising out of the bomb attacks in Guildford and Woolwich in 1974.
The report criticised the trial judge John Donaldson. It unearthed improprieties in the handling of scientific evidence that were also relevant to the other cases and declared the convictions unsound and recommended referral back to the Court of Appeal.
The Scientific work in examining the failings of the original forensic work leading to the convictions was undertaken by the "West" Committee led by Professor Thomas Summers West CBE. FRS. and the findings published in 1992 in Sir Johns May's report to the House of Commons entitled the Second Maguire report.
RARDE scientific tests
The Inquiry found that RARDE scientists Walter Elliott and Douglas Higgs had lied and suppressed evidence at the trials of both Judith Ward and the Maguire Seven. They knew but did not say that a positive result was not unique for nitroglycerine. They did not disclose, even to the prosecution, negative secondary tests.
The terms of reference of the initial inquiry were expanded, as a result, to include
- The preparation of court evidence by expert witnesses
- The advance disclosure of scientific findings
- The authorisation of prosecutions based on scientific evidence
- Home Office assessment of scientific evidence after miscarriage claims
Royal Commission on Criminal Justice
On 14 March 1991, the inquiry became the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice covering the systemic problems uncovered earlier.The commission was chaired by Viscount Runciman of Doxford.
References
- Marcel Berlins (2006-10-07). "NatWest Three puzzle". Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 2007-08-09.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=and|coauthors=(help) - Beverley Schurr. "Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-08-05.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=and|coauthors=(help) - Hansard Debates 12 July 1990
- "Sir John May Interim Report 1989".
- "1992 Sir John May, 2nd Maguire report into Guilford and Woolwich Bombings" (PDF).
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=(help) - Beverley Schurr. "Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-08-05.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=and|coauthors=(help)
  | This United Kingdom law-related biographical article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |