Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:12, 13 June 2014

This user has opted out of talkbacks

This is DangerousPanda's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 1 day

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. the panda ₯’

Email

Hi, I tried responding to your email, but it bounced, saying "Remote host said: 550 Mailbox quota exceeded ". --Randykitty (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm. Probably because some moron e-mailed me a couple of dozen pictures yesterday in order to prove that his block was actually a requirement. I deleted it from the server (I think), not sure how long it takes to catch up the panda ₯’ 11:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Its not related to the above stuff, but I've just sent you an email. I figured this would be as good of a place as any. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 00:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

PC2 RfC

Jc and I have both published closing statements at Misplaced Pages:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014/Closure‎. Is there anything you'd like to add, or have us change? - Dank (push to talk) 18:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't like the direction it's taken whatsoever. This "if RFC in the future, there was consensus for..." is hogwash, and abdication of reading the entire discussion the panda ₯’ 21:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm all ears. - Dank (push to talk) 22:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Don't you mean all eyes? :P—cyberpower _Online 12:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Federal Court Order Approving AAFM Lawsuit to go Against Brett King and Geoff Baring in US Federal Court

On July 17th, 2013, a US Federal Judge ordered that all of the of seven lawsuit counterclaims by AAFM and Mentz could go forward to court against the former trainers: Brett King, Geoff Baring and the IABFM. The US Court order stated that AAFM and Mr. George Mentz could sue Mr. Brett King, Mr. Geoffrey Baring and IABFM individually for numerous lawsuit counts in federal court including: (1) theft (2) defamation, (3) breach of contract, (4) intentional interference with contractual relationships,(5) conspiracy, (6) copyright infringement, and (7) fraud violations of the Consumer Protection Act. After this key decision, the case was settled.

A hint as to what this is related to, why I'm involved, and what steps are required from me specifically would be nice the panda ₯’ 09:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Declined speedy

Thanks. I wasn't really sure there, but I took a stab at it. I don't usually go out on limbs like that with speedies. United States Man (talk) 00:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

While it's true he has no real clue, the first step is to discuss - like I started to do - and not to delete heavy-handedly :-) the panda ₯’ 09:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

DeadSend4...

... has been loosed upon the world again. I read your message there as suggesting you'd be okay with that, but thought I'd better let you know. Yunshui _水 10:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

I would say you read my statement properly :-) That said, looking at it now, it's somewhat convoluted - maybe intentionally. the panda ₯’ 10:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, far be it from us to avoid not stating the opposite of a clear explanation of what we don't intend to not leave undone... Yunshui _水 10:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

It would be undoubtedly an inssue to do that which, in doing, would less-than-doubtfully end up being done the panda ɛˢˡ” 12:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Useitorloseit

I was replying to Useitorloseit's "It doesn't make sense" section and edit-conflicted with his newer section and you locking his page (good call!). I still posted my response, plus added a further note. If you think my comment could lead to Bad Things, feel free to delete it. I think they need some nudging in a different direction and some ideas on what next, so left something. Hoping for the best ... Ravensfire (talk) 23:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Very extensive comments that hit the nail on the head. They'll need to realize that in order to get a topic ban rescinded they will need to:

1. wait a significant period of time (usually 6 months)
2. show extensive positive edits elsewhere on the project
3. show that they can keep their cool, and not break any of the rules that led to the topic ban

You've put them in the right direction - and I hope they listen the panda ₯’ 23:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

World's largest municipalities by population and the block

I just saw the BsBsBs block. I'm just wondering if this post was appropriate. It seemed like a BRD case, but I don't know what to do now. Guidance please. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

I think Zanhe's reply there to you hit the nail on the head. This appears to be one of those situations where someone tried to get their way, failed, so created a new - similar - article and tried to own it. I expect there to be little salvageable, and there are a lot of frayed nerves over there right now the panda ₯’ 11:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough. Cheers. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

1. Colorado Federal Court Order Lawsuit against IABFM Brett King and Geoffrey Baring, Colorado United States District Court.