| Revision as of 19:29, 12 September 2014 editSergecross73 (talk | contribs)Administrators101,444 edits →September 2014: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:22, 12 September 2014 edit undoSonOfPlisskin (talk | contribs)467 edits →LD 50Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :: It's pointless trying to reason with this guy. He's the same person who kept removing nu metal from the genres a few months ago (and was temporarily banned as a result) and he'll keep using subjective reviews and cherry picked articles to "prove" his point of view, failing to understand that even if there are reviews saying that they're not nu-metal, it doesn't negate all the other articles saying that they are. He'll also delete any warnings posted here in order to look innocent. ] (]) 14:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | :: It's pointless trying to reason with this guy. He's the same person who kept removing nu metal from the genres a few months ago (and was temporarily banned as a result) and he'll keep using subjective reviews and cherry picked articles to "prove" his point of view, failing to understand that even if there are reviews saying that they're not nu-metal, it doesn't negate all the other articles saying that they are. He'll also delete any warnings posted here in order to look innocent. ] (]) 14:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::: I'm not "the same person" anything. I was not on Misplaced Pages "a few months ago". And stop asserting that the facts are "cherry picked" when it is your opinion which is cherry picked here. It does, in fact, negate the other articles, because they are minor sources and Sea of Tranquility is a well respected progressive rock magazine, an authority on the issue. Why do you not understand this? ] (]) 17:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | ::: I'm not "the same person" anything. I was not on Misplaced Pages "a few months ago". And stop asserting that the facts are "cherry picked" when it is your opinion which is cherry picked here. It does, in fact, negate the other articles, because they are minor sources and Sea of Tranquility is a well respected progressive rock magazine, an authority on the issue. Why do you not understand this? ] (]) 17:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::: Oh please. You're really bad at this. You want to add prog metal and get rid of nu-metal, you have a similar style of writing, you added the same "Fans Dig Mudvayne" article as a source, you edited many of the same sorts of pages (alternative/nu metal bands, Ralph Bashki films, etc.), you mentioned a link between Tarantino and spaghetti westerns, you quickly delete warnings from your page and you use "fancruft". You're either the same person or a copycat troll, which is even worse. It doesn't negate other sources because it's one subjective review. I'm sure if I tried I could find an article from a "well respected source" claiming that something like Slipknot is death metal. Even if you provided the number one source of all music ever, it's still one source. Ever hear of "general consensus?" Oh, and I'm going to add this reply on my talk page since you tend to delete stuff like this (even though people can easily just check the history). ] (]) 20:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2014 == | == September 2014 == | ||
Revision as of 20:22, 12 September 2014
LD 50
Hi, I've added more information on your recent edits to the LD 50 and the notability of the Sea of Tranquility site.. Could you take a look at them here and ? Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's pointless trying to reason with this guy. He's the same person who kept removing nu metal from the genres a few months ago (and was temporarily banned as a result) and he'll keep using subjective reviews and cherry picked articles to "prove" his point of view, failing to understand that even if there are reviews saying that they're not nu-metal, it doesn't negate all the other articles saying that they are. He'll also delete any warnings posted here in order to look innocent. SonOfPlisskin (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not "the same person" anything. I was not on Misplaced Pages "a few months ago". And stop asserting that the facts are "cherry picked" when it is your opinion which is cherry picked here. It does, in fact, negate the other articles, because they are minor sources and Sea of Tranquility is a well respected progressive rock magazine, an authority on the issue. Why do you not understand this? 64.134.96.198 (talk) 17:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oh please. You're really bad at this. You want to add prog metal and get rid of nu-metal, you have a similar style of writing, you added the same "Fans Dig Mudvayne" article as a source, you edited many of the same sorts of pages (alternative/nu metal bands, Ralph Bashki films, etc.), you mentioned a link between Tarantino and spaghetti westerns, you quickly delete warnings from your page and you use "fancruft". You're either the same person or a copycat troll, which is even worse. It doesn't negate other sources because it's one subjective review. I'm sure if I tried I could find an article from a "well respected source" claiming that something like Slipknot is death metal. Even if you provided the number one source of all music ever, it's still one source. Ever hear of "general consensus?" Oh, and I'm going to add this reply on my talk page since you tend to delete stuff like this (even though people can easily just check the history). SonOfPlisskin (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not "the same person" anything. I was not on Misplaced Pages "a few months ago". And stop asserting that the facts are "cherry picked" when it is your opinion which is cherry picked here. It does, in fact, negate the other articles, because they are minor sources and Sea of Tranquility is a well respected progressive rock magazine, an authority on the issue. Why do you not understand this? 64.134.96.198 (talk) 17:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's pointless trying to reason with this guy. He's the same person who kept removing nu metal from the genres a few months ago (and was temporarily banned as a result) and he'll keep using subjective reviews and cherry picked articles to "prove" his point of view, failing to understand that even if there are reviews saying that they're not nu-metal, it doesn't negate all the other articles saying that they are. He'll also delete any warnings posted here in order to look innocent. SonOfPlisskin (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
- While you're free to discuss the removal of the "genre" section of infoboxes (though I do not think you'll find consensus, you're free to try), you are not allowed to remove the genre field entirely unless there is extensive consensus to do so. So you definitely need to stop edits like this. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 19:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)