| Revision as of 01:01, 26 October 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,307,006 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Archive 2014) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:42, 26 October 2014 edit undoAlbinoFerret (talk | contribs)11,178 edits →October 2014Next edit → | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| :No, i'm sorry, but i have exactly 1 revert, as opposed to your 3. Funny how that works. --] 17:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | :No, i'm sorry, but i have exactly 1 revert, as opposed to your 3. Funny how that works. --] 17:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Could this be because you ran out of ]? --] 17:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | :Could this be because you ran out of ]? --] 17:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==RFC== | |||
| Please take a look at the e-cigarette talk page when you can. ] (]) 04:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:42, 26 October 2014
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Editing Principles - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all.
LoS: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LoS
Playground: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Temporary User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Sandbox
Inhofe list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Inhofe
William list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/William
Created articles: Sami Solanki, Jan Esper
Linux Weight: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LinuxWeight
CCD: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/CCD
Fossil treelines, et al
This is really a "thank you" for challenging my thinking, and catching a dumb error, over at the HS page. What a pleasure, particularly compared to interacting with the Wikilawyer at the Other Page... Once again, welcome back, and stay sharp! Cheers -- Pete Tillman
about wind power cost per one installization.
can u mail me, how much cost of a windpower plantation of an single. how much energy output. how much duration of time to install. all total cost of an one install.
Edit warring
You have been informed above so no need to inform again. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Pot, kettle, black. --Kim D. Petersen 13:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
E-cigarette
Hi Kim, I have been very busy on the article this evening. The changes may not stay but I had good reasons and references for all of it. You may want to take a look at the article because the banner may not be as needed as it once was. AlbinoFerret (talk) 01:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'll look at it tomorrow, time for bed right now, 'tis waay to late :) --Kim D. Petersen 01:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- I think you will like the changes. Most of them have been on the back burner because of the constant issues with QG. I finally had some free time to spend. AlbinoFerret (talk) 12:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fascinating. And you are WP:CANVASSING Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- How is he canvassing? I'm an active editor at the article. --Kim D. Petersen 17:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not only that you are the editor with the opposing view in the rfc on npov in the ecigarette article. I was just letting you know I had been busy editing the page and hoping you would like it and the rfc may be moot if you agreed and wanted to remove the banner. The comment was made last night before the edit difficulties today. This accusation is an example of not assuming good faith. AlbinoFerret (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- I would say that it is a step in the right direction. But the undue reliance on Grana, and on negative material, is the more serious problem. --Kim D. Petersen 23:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not only that you are the editor with the opposing view in the rfc on npov in the ecigarette article. I was just letting you know I had been busy editing the page and hoping you would like it and the rfc may be moot if you agreed and wanted to remove the banner. The comment was made last night before the edit difficulties today. This accusation is an example of not assuming good faith. AlbinoFerret (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- How is he canvassing? I'm an active editor at the article. --Kim D. Petersen 17:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fascinating. And you are WP:CANVASSING Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- I think you will like the changes. Most of them have been on the back burner because of the constant issues with QG. I finally had some free time to spend. AlbinoFerret (talk) 12:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- No, i'm sorry, but i have exactly 1 revert, as opposed to your 3. Funny how that works. --Kim D. Petersen 17:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Could this be because you ran out of reverts that you are allowed to do? --Kim D. Petersen 17:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
RFC
Please take a look at the e-cigarette talk page when you can. AlbinoFerret (talk) 04:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)