Revision as of 07:17, 7 November 2014 editCheesyAppleFlake (talk | contribs)171 edits →WP:CIVIL← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:36, 16 November 2014 edit undoAlbinoFerret (talk | contribs)11,178 edits →WP:CIVILNext edit → | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
::{{tps}} For a newish account that shows surprising familiarity with some out-of-the-way happenings from a while ago. Since you mention puppetry, I take it you are familiar with policy in this space. Have you got other accounts here? ] <sup>]|]|]</sup> 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | ::{{tps}} For a newish account that shows surprising familiarity with some out-of-the-way happenings from a while ago. Since you mention puppetry, I take it you are familiar with policy in this space. Have you got other accounts here? ] <sup>]|]|]</sup> 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Hardly out-of-the-way; the incestuous relationship between Quack and Doc James is pretty common knowledge. And no, I don't have other accounts. Do you?--] (]) 07:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | :::Hardly out-of-the-way; the incestuous relationship between Quack and Doc James is pretty common knowledge. And no, I don't have other accounts. Do you?--] (]) 07:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
==Please limit comments like these.== | |||
Hi ], I am facing a vote for topic ban for negative comments against another user, Quack. Using "Quackhead" isnt a good idea. I dont want to see you up on the ] noticeboard. Please change it. ] 00:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:36, 16 November 2014
Welcome!
|
Dispute resolution re McNeill for Electronic cigarette article
I requested dispute resolution with respect to this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Electronic_cigarette#Violation_of_consensus
Please join the discussion. Mihaister (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:CIVIL
This comment is not appropriate . Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- By now everyone knows Quack is basically your meatpuppet, after you gave him a barnstar in the middle of a discussion about his repeated disruptive editing.--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 23:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) For a newish account that shows surprising familiarity with some out-of-the-way happenings from a while ago. Since you mention puppetry, I take it you are familiar with policy in this space. Have you got other accounts here? Alexbrn 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hardly out-of-the-way; the incestuous relationship between Quack and Doc James is pretty common knowledge. And no, I don't have other accounts. Do you?--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) For a newish account that shows surprising familiarity with some out-of-the-way happenings from a while ago. Since you mention puppetry, I take it you are familiar with policy in this space. Have you got other accounts here? Alexbrn 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Please limit comments like these.
Hi CheesyAppleFlake, I am facing a vote for topic ban for negative comments against another user, Quack. Using "Quackhead" isnt a good idea. I dont want to see you up on the WP:AN/I noticeboard. Please change it. AlbinoFerret 00:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)