| Revision as of 19:27, 16 November 2014 editKrano (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,241 edits Level 4 warning re. Alex Boulanger (HG)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:32, 16 November 2014 edit undoMrBill3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers39,593 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Monte Boulanger. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| <div style=clear: both></div>] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>, you may be '''] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-4 --><!-- Template:uw-delete4 -->] (]) 19:27, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | <div style=clear: both></div>] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>, you may be '''] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-4 --><!-- Template:uw-delete4 -->] (]) 19:27, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 19:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:32, 16 November 2014
November 2014
Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Monte Boulanger— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Alex Boulanger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alex Boulanger was changed by Fortrade59 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852692 on 2014-11-16T19:17:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Alex Boulanger with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Avono (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Alex Boulanger with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Avono (talk) 19:27, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Monte Boulanger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrBill3 (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)