| Revision as of 18:26, 12 December 2014 editPamD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers206,583 edits k← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:04, 13 December 2014 edit undoMetamagician3000 (talk | contribs)Administrators10,855 edits →Carmen Molina: keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Keep''' no problem with ], when no clear primary. No evidence has been put forward that actress is primary, and if she was, this would be ], ] to ] and ] to ]. Then the dab could be looked at for possible deletion. ] (]) 17:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' no problem with ], when no clear primary. No evidence has been put forward that actress is primary, and if she was, this would be ], ] to ] and ] to ]. Then the dab could be looked at for possible deletion. ] (]) 17:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''': there was redirect to a character list; a new article was created for an actress with the same name; the editor doing so carefully moved the incoming links to the character; all is well. Unless anyone has a strong argument to show which is the Primary Topic, this is how dab pages should work and there's no problem having a dab page with just 2 entries. (In other words, "Keep per Boleyn" - I hadn't spotted her comment while I was looking into it). ]] 18:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': there was redirect to a character list; a new article was created for an actress with the same name; the editor doing so carefully moved the incoming links to the character; all is well. Unless anyone has a strong argument to show which is the Primary Topic, this is how dab pages should work and there's no problem having a dab page with just 2 entries. (In other words, "Keep per Boleyn" - I hadn't spotted her comment while I was looking into it). ]] 18:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per ]. ] (]) 09:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:04, 13 December 2014
Carmen Molina
- Carmen Molina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was "redone as dab" by @Carlossuarez46: but I have no idea why, as this dab page only has two entries on it... This is why hatnotes exist. The question is which should be the primary target--the Mexican actress. I can't page move it though and copy/pasting will destroy the page history. So someone should delete this and move the (actress) article to the main page with a hatnote at the top that reads {{for|the ''Breaking Bad'' character|Carmen Molina (Breaking Bad)}}. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- There were various links for the actress going to the redirect to Breaking Bad character, so I created the actress article and dabbed the redirect. Frankly, given the massive recentism of WP, I thought that leaving the dab between the two as neither popped as immensely the primary than the other - but let the community decide which (if either) is the primary use and hatdab the other (although the character is way down in some long article, so hatdab isn't really a hat...) Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:29, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep no problem with WP:2DABS, when no clear primary. No evidence has been put forward that actress is primary, and if she was, this would be WP:RM, Carmen Molina to Carmen Molina (disambiguation) and Carmen Molina (actress) to Carmen Molina. Then the dab could be looked at for possible deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: there was redirect to a character list; a new article was created for an actress with the same name; the editor doing so carefully moved the incoming links to the character; all is well. Unless anyone has a strong argument to show which is the Primary Topic, this is how dab pages should work and there's no problem having a dab page with just 2 entries. (In other words, "Keep per Boleyn" - I hadn't spotted her comment while I was looking into it). PamD 18:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per PamD. Metamagician3000 (talk) 09:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)