| Revision as of 14:00, 13 January 2015 editTanbircdq (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,440 edits →Pink (singer): Another one← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:23, 14 January 2015 edit undoLivelikemusic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers55,493 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on 1989 (Taylor Swift album). (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
| It is OK to mention in passing that there was an edit war or a heated discussion, but please avoid naming anyone or making user behavior a topic of discussion. If someone else talks about other users, '''do not respond in any way'''. Ignore the comment and let me deal with it. --] (]) 17:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | It is OK to mention in passing that there was an edit war or a heated discussion, but please avoid naming anyone or making user behavior a topic of discussion. If someone else talks about other users, '''do not respond in any way'''. Ignore the comment and let me deal with it. --] (]) 17:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == January 2015 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''']''' ] 02:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:23, 14 January 2015
| This is Joseph Prasad's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
This is my talk page. Leave me messages here.
Echosmith
The indie pop genre. It might be sourced, but genre additions are always contentious. I personally don't have anything against additions of genres, but I suspect others will. Ss112 07:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, @Ss112:, but people have been trying to remove rock as a genre. And We've come to a consensus on the genres Rock and Indie-pop. I will revert it, if they are removed, and tell them to discuss on talk page if needed. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 07:43, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year Joseph Prasad!
Joseph Prasad,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Francesca Battistelli
- It's the wrong template. The correct template is {{BLP sources}}
- Every section has references except the awards section so I'm not sure what needs additional references. Tagging a specific sentence with a {{[[Template:citation
needed|citation needed]]}} template or a section by using {{BLP sources|section|date=December 2014}}. The template is not valid and if you don't remove it and apply something more appropriate I will remove it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drake Bell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Collins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Traynor discography
What I saw was blanking of content and an edit summary that said, "(I hate that person!)". Thought it was vandalism. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC) @Winkelvi: It's fine, I understand. But if you look through the history, that user was editing that article for a while before it was deleted along with Meghan Trainor. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Pink (singer)
Hi, I thought you should know that your edits here and here on Pink (singer), have been reverted by what appears to be the same IP hopper here.
I have tried to engage in a discussion on the talk page to resolve the matter. However, after leaving one comment he/she is refusing to reply to the points I have raised on the matter and is just repeatedly reverting the edit. I was wondering if you would also leave your comments on the issue there, thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 13:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I hope you are well. It appears the same problem is happening on Fergie (singer), I thought maybe you would like to take a look at the talk page discussion, thanks again, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 14:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Drake Bell
The new event is fine with me. Not sure if someone else will revert it or not. With your previous entry, it looked like an event based on Drake Bell whereas the new one is more towards the revival of rockabilly, which makes it far more notable. Thanks for the edit! Contactman7 (talk) 02:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The Beatles Invite
|
Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Misplaced Pages? Please feel free to join us. | ||||||
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!
| |||||||
January 2015
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. livelikemusic 04:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Livelikemusic:, I only reverted twice. Not three times. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is at DRN:Meghan Trainor. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! - Lips 10:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC) (Edited by Guy Macon (talk) 08:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC))
- @Lips Are Movin: OK, I'll be glad to participate, but I have to get some sleep and will help tomorrow. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 11:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Rihanna, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.If you feel that something is not correct, YOU take it to the talk page. Until then, nothing gets changed. — ₳aron 12:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Indian:BIO 12:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Joseph_Prasad reported by User:Calvin999 (Result: ). Thank you. — ₳aron 13:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- It looks to me that you broke 3RR at Rihanna. Please see a suggestion I left for you in the complaint. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Can you let me know whether you will be accepting my offer? EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- @EdJohnston: Oh, sorry. Wasn't actually paying attention to messages. It's not even on my Watchlist anymore, so I won't be editing the article any longer anyway. Not being a big fan of Rihanna, I've decided to drop the article from my Watchlist. -- 02:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Can you let me know whether you will be accepting my offer? EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
WP:DRN
Hi! I am the WP:DRN Volunteer who will be attempting to mediate the case at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Meghan Trainor. I noticed that in your Summary of dispute you wrote something that violates our ground rules (we only discuss article content, never user conduct. Do not talk about other editors.). Specifically, you wrote "A couple of the editors feel to have a personal connection to the subject in question, one user having a username of a title of one of Trainor's songs". Please edit your statement so that it no longer talks about other users. Thanks!
It is OK to mention in passing that there was an edit war or a heated discussion, but please avoid naming anyone or making user behavior a topic of discussion. If someone else talks about other users, do not respond in any way. Ignore the comment and let me deal with it. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. livelikemusic 02:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)