Revision as of 19:23, 24 February 2015 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,137 edits lots of sites to support notability; hey, if one event in the 1900 Olympics gets you into WP, who am I to kvetch?← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:37, 25 February 2015 edit undoDieSwartzPunkt (talk | contribs)3,096 edits cmNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==This is a user talk page == | ==This is a user talk page == | ||
==February 2015== | |||
===Multiple tags at heads of articles=== | |||
If you are not going to edit correctly, then it would be better for the project if you did not edit it at all. | |||
& Please use the <nowiki>{{multiple|...}}</nowiki> template when you add a tag that results in multiple issues. | |||
Please delete the <nowiki>{{multiple|...}}</nowiki> template when you delete a tag leaving only a single tag remaining. ] (]) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
===Reverting the deletion of a PROD=== | |||
With regard to this edit: , you are not permitted to revert the deletion of a PROD, regardless of who challenged it. You must use ] once the PROD is challenged. As this was yet another unwarranted revert of an IP address editor, I have added the revert to the now running list of such reversions of IP address editor's contributions. This list has been initiated to be used as the evidence in an ] case once there are enough of them. ] (]) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:37, 25 February 2015
This is a user talk page
February 2015
Multiple tags at heads of articles
If you are not going to edit correctly, then it would be better for the project if you did not edit it at all.
& Please use the {{multiple|...}} template when you add a tag that results in multiple issues.
Please delete the {{multiple|...}} template when you delete a tag leaving only a single tag remaining. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Reverting the deletion of a PROD
With regard to this edit: , you are not permitted to revert the deletion of a PROD, regardless of who challenged it. You must use WP:AFD once the PROD is challenged. As this was yet another unwarranted revert of an IP address editor, I have added the revert to the now running list of such reversions of IP address editor's contributions. This list has been initiated to be used as the evidence in an ANI case once there are enough of them. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)