| Revision as of 04:45, 14 September 2015 editΓνῶθι σεαυτόν (talk | contribs)885 edits →Politkovskaya topic ban: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:54, 14 September 2015 edit undoΓνῶθι σεαυτόν (talk | contribs)885 edits →Politkovskaya topic banNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| I will not appeal the sanction, since I have grown tired of the subject. However, I would be very grateful if you could explain to me why I am the only one who is sanctioned. I am the first editor who deleted the mention of "Putin's birthday". I did so because I believed it to be a clear violation of BLP which, as such, could be deleted on sight by anyone. ''Lute88'' undid my revision repeatedly with no explanation and did not discuss the matter with me on the talk page. Instead, his position was defended, very energetically, by ''My very best wishes''. When, trying to explain my removal, I said that, in a court of law, the innuendo would be considered libel, he replied "Please see Misplaced Pages:No legal threats. One can be blocked for doing this." However, it should have been clear to anyone that I was not making any kind of threat, just stating the law. If you take a closer look, you will notice that I stopped removing the BLP violation the moment ''My very best wishes'' entered the discussion and I never edited the page since then. Finally, an admin, ''Drmies'', agreed with me and removed the BLP violation. Only then did the disgruntled ''Lute88'' enter the discussion, attacking me with "Why do I smell this? - http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/03/news/russia-troll-factory-putin/ --Lute88 (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)" When told by Drmies that it was not funny, he replied with " No fun intended. Againstdisinformation has been pushing the proRussian POV envelope here for some time. And there has been recent media coverage of some professional (and paid too) POV promoters on Wiki. Just being vigilant...--Lute88 (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)23:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)". I asked him to "take back immediately your slanderous accusations", which he refused to do. I note that you did not sanction him for it, while you sanction me for incivility and personal attacks for "apart from editors with a long history of anti-Russian POV-pushing". This sentence attacks no one in particular, since no one is named. You will note too that, after ''Lute88'' insulted me, I stopped making posts on the talk page until a few hours ago. The increasingly aggressive tone used by ''Volunteer Marek'' and his obstinate edit warring decided me to support ''BMK'', hence my edits. Now, I fail to see what you find more uncivil in my edits than the accusation of being a Putin's stooge, on the Kremlin's payroll. For the moment, forgive me for saying so, but it looks like double standards. ] (]) 04:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | I will not appeal the sanction, since I have grown tired of the subject. However, I would be very grateful if you could explain to me why I am the only one who is sanctioned. I am the first editor who deleted the mention of "Putin's birthday". I did so because I believed it to be a clear violation of BLP which, as such, could be deleted on sight by anyone. ''Lute88'' undid my revision repeatedly with no explanation and did not discuss the matter with me on the talk page. Instead, his position was defended, very energetically, by ''My very best wishes''. When, trying to explain my removal, I said that, in a court of law, the innuendo would be considered libel, he replied "Please see Misplaced Pages:No legal threats. One can be blocked for doing this." However, it should have been clear to anyone that I was not making any kind of threat, just stating the law. If you take a closer look, you will notice that I stopped removing the BLP violation the moment ''My very best wishes'' entered the discussion and I never edited the page since then. Finally, an admin, ''Drmies'', agreed with me and removed the BLP violation. Only then did the disgruntled ''Lute88'' enter the discussion, attacking me with "Why do I smell this? - http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/03/news/russia-troll-factory-putin/ --Lute88 (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)" When told by Drmies that it was not funny, he replied with " No fun intended. Againstdisinformation has been pushing the proRussian POV envelope here for some time. And there has been recent media coverage of some professional (and paid too) POV promoters on Wiki. Just being vigilant...--Lute88 (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)23:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)". I asked him to "take back immediately your slanderous accusations", which he refused to do. I note that you did not sanction him for it, while you sanction me for incivility and personal attacks for "apart from editors with a long history of anti-Russian POV-pushing". This sentence attacks no one in particular, since no one is named. You will note too that, after ''Lute88'' insulted me, I stopped making posts on the talk page until a few hours ago. The increasingly aggressive tone used by ''Volunteer Marek'' and his obstinate edit warring decided me to support ''BMK'', hence my edits. Now, I fail to see what you find more uncivil in my edits than the accusation of being a Putin's stooge, on the Kremlin's payroll. For the moment, forgive me for saying so, but it looks like double standards. ] (]) 04:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :: Sorry, I forgot the quote I wanted you to see in order to form a judgement on the civil manner My very best wishes uses to address me: "Please stop being a ridiculous thoughtless jerk". I,for my part, never insulted anyone. ] (]) 04:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:54, 14 September 2015
 | Callanecc is busy and may not respond swiftly to queries. |  |
Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Misplaced Pages it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Misplaced Pages to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm back
Hi everyone, I'm back now. If you left me a message and you still want an answer could you please repost it? Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
98.113.103.90
I rev/del'd one of the IP's edits. I don't know if you want to suppress it.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, suppressed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Youtube Page
That's fine and all but couldn't you have fixed the vandalism on the page before protecting it? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 05:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, reverted. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Politkovskaya topic ban
I will not appeal the sanction, since I have grown tired of the subject. However, I would be very grateful if you could explain to me why I am the only one who is sanctioned. I am the first editor who deleted the mention of "Putin's birthday". I did so because I believed it to be a clear violation of BLP which, as such, could be deleted on sight by anyone. Lute88 undid my revision repeatedly with no explanation and did not discuss the matter with me on the talk page. Instead, his position was defended, very energetically, by My very best wishes. When, trying to explain my removal, I said that, in a court of law, the innuendo would be considered libel, he replied "Please see Misplaced Pages:No legal threats. One can be blocked for doing this." However, it should have been clear to anyone that I was not making any kind of threat, just stating the law. If you take a closer look, you will notice that I stopped removing the BLP violation the moment My very best wishes entered the discussion and I never edited the page since then. Finally, an admin, Drmies, agreed with me and removed the BLP violation. Only then did the disgruntled Lute88 enter the discussion, attacking me with "Why do I smell this? - http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/03/news/russia-troll-factory-putin/ --Lute88 (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)" When told by Drmies that it was not funny, he replied with " No fun intended. Againstdisinformation has been pushing the proRussian POV envelope here for some time. And there has been recent media coverage of some professional (and paid too) POV promoters on Wiki. Just being vigilant...--Lute88 (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)23:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)". I asked him to "take back immediately your slanderous accusations", which he refused to do. I note that you did not sanction him for it, while you sanction me for incivility and personal attacks for "apart from editors with a long history of anti-Russian POV-pushing". This sentence attacks no one in particular, since no one is named. You will note too that, after Lute88 insulted me, I stopped making posts on the talk page until a few hours ago. The increasingly aggressive tone used by Volunteer Marek and his obstinate edit warring decided me to support BMK, hence my edits. Now, I fail to see what you find more uncivil in my edits than the accusation of being a Putin's stooge, on the Kremlin's payroll. For the moment, forgive me for saying so, but it looks like double standards. Againstdisinformation (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forgot the quote I wanted you to see in order to form a judgement on the civil manner My very best wishes uses to address me: "Please stop being a ridiculous thoughtless jerk". I,for my part, never insulted anyone. Againstdisinformation (talk) 04:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)