| Revision as of 01:24, 14 September 2015 editBluesangrel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users149,241 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:05, 17 September 2015 edit undoBagumba (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators174,832 edits →All-Europe Player of the Year: delNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ::Except that all my articles, including this one are sourced, and I am making no such edits as a "fan page". And I read the criteria and this article meets the standard. You simply put it up for deletion because you are mad at me, just because I asked you why you were changing dozens of articles height parameters.] (]) 15:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC) | ::Except that all my articles, including this one are sourced, and I am making no such edits as a "fan page". And I read the criteria and this article meets the standard. You simply put it up for deletion because you are mad at me, just because I asked you why you were changing dozens of articles height parameters.] (]) 15:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::Also, are you not supposed to notify people when you mark their articles for deletion? I thought that you are? ArmstrongJulian marks several articles for deletion, but never gives a notice to the creator of the article that they were marked for deletion. I thought you were supposed to do that.] (]) 01:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | ::Also, are you not supposed to notify people when you mark their articles for deletion? I thought that you are? ArmstrongJulian marks several articles for deletion, but never gives a notice to the creator of the article that they were marked for deletion. I thought you were supposed to do that.] (]) 01:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fails ]. No evidence of independent reliable sources that discuss this grouping. Granted, I might not find these on English websites, and also wouldn't know which ones are reliable. This is the difficulty with dealing with potentially notable subjects covered in predominantly non-English sources. However, no persuasive arguments have been forthcoming either.—] (]) 01:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:05, 17 September 2015
All-Europe Player of the Year
- All-Europe Player of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete:Despite the glossy title this is just a selection by a sports website, Eurobasket.com, which itself struggles with notability (though to be fair it is a popular basketball website) similar to the end of season All-whatever selections of thousands of websites. It has no notability beyond the website itself (most awardees don't aknowledge the "distinction") with the lack of coverage to boot.}} ArmstrongJulian (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. --ArmstrongJulian (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)--ArmstrongJulian (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 14:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Every media outlet sets awards, no evidence Eurobasket's carry any extra weight/notability. Rikster2 (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per above. No extra weight for EuroBasket awards. ~EDDY ~ 20:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The person nominating the award is doing so simply because they are mad at me and I created the article and they want these deleted. Look at my talk page and you can see that. I don't like to have to say that, but it is clear.Bluesangrel (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- My problem with this article, and indeed a number of your edits, is that it doesn't answer wikipedia's notability requirements, do us all a favour and try reading the official policy that determines what should be on the site. You keep making contributions (and I use the term loosely) that are unsourced (again read the guideline) and make unsupported claims, this is not a forum or fan page but a website that aims for a certain standard yet you keep editing and acting as if it was the former. --ArmstrongJulian (talk) 19:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Except that all my articles, including this one are sourced, and I am making no such edits as a "fan page". And I read the criteria and this article meets the standard. You simply put it up for deletion because you are mad at me, just because I asked you why you were changing dozens of articles height parameters.Bluesangrel (talk) 15:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Also, are you not supposed to notify people when you mark their articles for deletion? I thought that you are? ArmstrongJulian marks several articles for deletion, but never gives a notice to the creator of the article that they were marked for deletion. I thought you were supposed to do that.Bluesangrel (talk) 01:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:LISTN. No evidence of independent reliable sources that discuss this grouping. Granted, I might not find these on English websites, and also wouldn't know which ones are reliable. This is the difficulty with dealing with potentially notable subjects covered in predominantly non-English sources. However, no persuasive arguments have been forthcoming either.—Bagumba (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)