| Revision as of 09:11, 20 September 2015 editGeorge Ho (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users118,264 edits →File:Madonna-Material-Girl-333295.jpg: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:42, 20 September 2015 edit undo86.2.216.5 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Endorse''' I can't see "I've change my mind" as a DRV criteria. Regardless the two discussion you've listed are pretty poor with the majority of participants not concerning themselves with NFCC, as the original closer of the FFD discussion here said "Ultimately, the NFCC cannot be overridden by a local consensus.." which is exactly what you seem to be requesting. --] (]) 07:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | *'''Endorse''' I can't see "I've change my mind" as a DRV criteria. Regardless the two discussion you've listed are pretty poor with the majority of participants not concerning themselves with NFCC, as the original closer of the FFD discussion here said "Ultimately, the NFCC cannot be overridden by a local consensus.." which is exactly what you seem to be requesting. --] (]) 07:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :: What about ]? --] (]) 09:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | :: What about ]? --] (]) 09:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::: What about it? It's another discussion trying to decide a local consensus about an issue in that article, it isn't an FFD discussion about if the relevant fair use rationales are met. NFCC doesn't have a hard and fast "one image only" rule, and those discussions aren't really trying to determine if ] is met or not, mostly they are assuming a valid rationale exists. This leads to two points (1) we don't fragment discussions on such issues everywhere, if it isn't determined by ] then it's no where near a definitive view, people don't trawl every article looking for such discussions to implement ] (2) each situation is different, just because one article has two fair use images and ] agrees they are both valid claims for that article, does not mean every other similar article can then have two fair use images. --] (]) 09:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:42, 20 September 2015
< 2015 September 19 Deletion review archives: 2015 September 2015 September 21 >20 September 2015
File:Madonna-Material-Girl-333295.jpg
It was used in "Material Girl" until I replaced it with the American artwork. I chatted with the administrator who deleted the image per FFD a couple years ago. At first deletion was the right decision, but discussions, such as Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song) and Talk:I'm Coming Out, convinced me to have second thoughts. WP:NFCC has been enforced to restrict amount of cover arts to normally just one, but majority said keep two images in FFD. I did vote "delete", but now I'm unsure whether it was the right vote. George Ho (talk) 05:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Endorse I can't see "I've change my mind" as a DRV criteria. Regardless the two discussion you've listed are pretty poor with the majority of participants not concerning themselves with NFCC, as the original closer of the FFD discussion here said "Ultimately, the NFCC cannot be overridden by a local consensus.." which is exactly what you seem to be requesting. --86.2.216.5 (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- What about Talk:Wildside (Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch song)#Infobox image? --George Ho (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- What about it? It's another discussion trying to decide a local consensus about an issue in that article, it isn't an FFD discussion about if the relevant fair use rationales are met. NFCC doesn't have a hard and fast "one image only" rule, and those discussions aren't really trying to determine if WP:NFCC is met or not, mostly they are assuming a valid rationale exists. This leads to two points (1) we don't fragment discussions on such issues everywhere, if it isn't determined by WP:FFD then it's no where near a definitive view, people don't trawl every article looking for such discussions to implement WP:NFCC (2) each situation is different, just because one article has two fair use images and WP:FFD agrees they are both valid claims for that article, does not mean every other similar article can then have two fair use images. --86.2.216.5 (talk) 09:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- What about Talk:Wildside (Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch song)#Infobox image? --George Ho (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)