Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:24, 15 August 2006

Archives
1

The human rights stub

Will try to get some nice sources and information added today. Thanks for letting me know, and putting in the work to get it going. -SA Sarastro777 17:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Adding quotation marks to headings…

…is a pretty blatant way of casting aspersions on the article. For the record: Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Human rights in Israel. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Avi 13:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Tel Aviv

Is not the capital of Israel. Please refrain from making such idiotic edits. --Daniel575 07:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

For the record: Please stop. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Israel, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Furthermore, reinserting the same commentary multiple times may cause you to violate the three-revert rule, which can lead to a block. -- Avi 16:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

What commentary did I add? Warning someone because you disagree with things is agaist Misplaced Pages's civil convention, and abusive of your administrative powers. 3RR? It seems you, Slim Virgin, Moshe, SJ and Humus, seem to think you own Misplaced Pages and constantly revert peoples work citing vandalizm, it it does not fit in with your biased perpective. I urge you to cease and desist this blatant disregard for rules.--Oiboy77 17:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please Dont Vandalize User Pages

Please refrain from vandalizing my userpage. It is apparernt that you have an agenda to push and continue to disregard Misplaced Pages's NPOV rule. I urge you to cease and desist with your blantant disregard for civil discussion and your "ownership" of articles. --Oiboy77 17:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

My dear Oiboy, it has nothing to do with vandalization. You had violated wp:npov with your Jeruslaem --> Tel Aviv edit. Please read the excellent article on Jerusalem for more background. You know better than that. -- Avi 17:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

israel and the UN

subject to repeated buffing and POV editing - please check it out. 86.27.55.184 22:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Warning

With these edits: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Human_rights_in_Israel&diff=68210173&oldid=68165482 Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Human rights in Israel. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Avi 16:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Avi, do not post warnings onm my page that accuse me of NPOV. It was alleged and it should stay as such. Misplaced Pages is NOT your soapbox --Oiboy77 16:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Very funny. Pasting improper warnings is a form of vandalism, Oiboy. Also, we went through this before, placing "Alleged" on everything, even Sarastro removed them, IIRC. Need I bring the diffs? Stop trying to whitewash everything to fit your anti-Israel point of view. Stick with facts, as we all should -- Avi 16:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I've made the Israeli and Palestinian accusations symmetrical. Check the diffs. And for the record Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.. -- Avi 16:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Something is alleged unless there is clear fact that proved it happend. Please refrain from uncivil comments. Such as saying I have an anti-Israeli POV. I'm here for neutrality, which is more than I can say for some people here.--Oiboy77 16:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, then you should be overjoyed to know that I have found a citation, so it is no longer alleged. -- Avi 16:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

So we can use "reported to now" as you did in the previous paragraph.--Oiboy77 16:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

As long as the Palestinian and Israeli claims are symmetrical, I am fine with that. There are sources for both, so both should be treated equally and evenly. -- Avi 16:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The claims against the Israeli's do not have the "reported" next to them, do you consider that symmetrical? You lose credibility when you say one thing and do another, you know. If you want editors to work with you, you have to work with them. Your edit history, unfortunately, often implies otherwise. -- Avi 16:48, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Feel free to add them.--Oiboy77 17:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Stifle (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Stifle for the following reason (see our blocking policy): 3RR violation at Human rights in Israel Your IP address is 154.5.83.33.

I have not violated the 3RR Please see the edits and the block request at: ]

It clearly shows my edits were different and I did discuss the matter on the talk page before changing my edit.

Actualy, you reverted four times and marked them as reverts in the edit summary. The policy says any four reverts, not just the identical reverts, else everybody would do three reverts, and then do another three in a rephrased maner, et,c,etc, .Blnguyen | rant-line 07:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Block endorsed. Please read through the first paragraph of WP:3RR#Detail. Your four reverts apply. Thanks, Sango123 02:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Political Prisoners

RE:Warning

You bypassed Misplaced Pages:Dispute Resolution by blanking my page and then using an Admin tool to protect it. Blanking is vandalism, especially after you continued your behavior despite being warned. Misuing a protect without discussion or involvement in an article also constitutes an abuse of the tool especially when involved in a content disagreement.

{{blatantvandal}}

Sarastro777 22:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing warnings from your talk page as this is considered vandalism. See ] --Oiboy77 02:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello. Please feel free to appeal my decision through whichever channels you see fit. Thanks. El_C 04:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

OiBoy, if he has done this to your tags as well, you may wish to file a complaint/notice. Deleting the tags is considered vandalism. If he has a problem with the tags, then he needs to follow a procedure to have them removed and can't delete them himself. People are introducing the false argument that adding the tags is vandalism or uncalled for, but of course if that were a provable case then it would be reported on the AN\I board. It's all apologetics for the inappropriate behavior of an Administrator who has been sanctioned for misbehavior before.

You should be able to use my example as template: ]

To get the "diff" go to his userpage, click "User Contributions" in the left margin and copy the URL/link off the word "diff." This allows the other Admins to verify he did what you said. Cheers. Sarastro777 17:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

You committed some serious and intentional vandalism here. If it were up to me, you'd get blocked for a year because of this. You should be ashamed of yourself. --Daniel575 17:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Removed Inappropiate tags

Placing warning tags on peoples pages when the dispute is about you is inappropiate. I simply added your name to an edit you did that was unsigned. Is that innapproprate? See ] --Oiboy77 18:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Your actions

Would you mind explaining this edit? okedem 17:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC) Perhaps you should see this ]