Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:10, 9 February 2016

Welcome!

Hello, Triggerhippie4, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 19:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

I have surplus Chametz

Thanks for your tidy-up work on the Israel article Best Wishes AnkhMorpork (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for all your contributions and thank you for your feedback.

Harkey (talk) 10:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

help

In Israel, please add the photo i putted in the talk page. 109.64.173.10 (talk) 09:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Hope you are still there

If you take your eye of that article for 2 minutes someone will stuff it up in some way. It's 4.00 pm here and I'm taking a lunch break.

Amandajm (talk) 06:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Please use edit summaries when you make changes. Mitt Romney is a very high profile article that is in the final stages of a Featured Article candidate review, and even the slightest changes to citation formats need to be explained. And if you have structural changes to the citation formatting, please discuss them on the article's Talk page first. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nefesh B'Nefesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oleh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Palestine-Israel enforcement restriction

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

• Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
• The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
• Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
• Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Seriously?

This section has been moved to Template talk:History of Israel.

History of Israel: State of Israel (1948–present)

The section dealt with two points, the second of which was Truman's recognition of the new state. I am curious to know why you removed the link to Israel–United States relations. Trahelliven (talk) 06:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Trahelliven (talk) 06:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

The section called "State of Israel (1948–present)" has a subsections and includes all Israeli history since 1948. Israel–United States relations not that matter to include along with the Israeli Declaration of Independence. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 14:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made)

I wonder if you could comply with the requiement to supply an Edit summary and briefly describe the changes you make. Trahelliven (talk) 06:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Trahelliven (talk) 06:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I would make the same request -- you seem to be making many edits, but not leaving any edit summaries whatsover, as here. Epeefleche (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Moshe Friedman

Self-proclaimed Rabbi who visited Iran, Denies the Holocaust, helps Hamas. Can you help with edits on this page http://en.wikipedia.org/Moshe_friedman Tellyuer1 (talk) 18:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

History of Judah articles

Why did you remove {{History of the Palestinian territories}} from articles about the history of Judea? That template deals with the history of Judah. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

The article covers all Judea history, not Arab Palestinian period.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

So does the template. {{History of France}} also deals with history before the French people were in France. Same with {{History of England}}. So why remove it. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 18:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Also could you please discuss instead of edit waring. You made an edit and I reverted it. That means we discuss. The last person who simply re-removed the template from the Judah article instead of discussing got blocked for 1RR because of it. Also that was someone else, not me or you, who removed the map, the message about the map was meant for someone else. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Because it goes to {{History of Palestine}}, not {{History of the Palestinian territories}}.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 18:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

{{History of Palestine}} is for the History of Palestine. {{History of the Palestinian territories}} is for the History of what is today the Palestinian territories, including Judea; it has a whole section for Judah. That's what the template deals with, not just the Arab period. So again, why remove {{History of the Palestinian territories}} from all those articles? It clearly deals with Judea. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 18:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

"not just the Arab period" belongs to {{History of Palestine}}. {{History of the Palestinian territories}} is Arab period. Judea shouldn't be in the latter one.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 19:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm gonna correct myself. Judea doesn't belong in neither of these. One deals with the Arab period and the other has no place for it since it's history template not geography.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 19:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your reason for removing the template contradicts the template's clear scope. So you think that articles about the ancient West Bank shouldn't be covered under {{History of the Palestinian territories}}, your entitled to that opinion but they are. Palestine is a far larger area then the Palestinian territories, and until the mid 20th century the Arabs have inhabited Palestine, not just the territories, so to simply say that Arabs are dealt with under the territories doesn't work. Plenty of other country/territory history templates deal with Ancient times from before the present day inhabitants lived in the country/territory. So keeping the template's scope in mind, why remove the template? Also, could you revert your 1rr volitions please. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 19:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

The Arab period of Palestine is dealt with under the "Islamic rule" section of {{History of Palestine}}. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

"Palestine is a far larger area then the Palestinian territories" – not "far." There is no and likely won't be any templates other than {{History of Israel}}, {{History of the Palestinian territories}} and {{History of Palestine}}. First is for Jewish history in the region, second – Arab, and third – in general.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 20:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

And by the way, {{History of the Palestinian territories}} is redirect. Template called {{Governance of Palestine from 1948}}.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Again, that contradicts the clear scope of the territories template, it clearly deals with the territories, not Palestine or the Arab period of Palestine but the territories, from ancient times to present. The Israel template is for Jewish history in Palestine and the modern state of Israel. As the primary editor of the territories template, and an editor heavily involved in the early development of the Israel template, I assure you that those are the scopes.

You can clearly see that the territories template doesn't deal with Arab period of Palestine by looking at it and seeing that it doesn't contain all those Arabian Caliphates that are covered under the "Islamic rule" section of the Palestine template. And it clearly covers ancient times. You may disagree with that scope, but that is clearly the scope.

Excluding Transjorden, Israel's territory consists of most of Palestine, so it simply didn't make sense for the Israel template to cover the whole history of Palestine (unlike {{History of Iraq}} which covers Iraq/Mesopotamia in general), because it would have been a duplicate of the Palestine template. If we need a template specify for Arab/Islamic history in Palistine we can make one, but I think that that would be too much a dulpcuate of the "Islamic rule" section and the territories template.

As for the redirect, the template is mis-titled, there was an editor who didn't like the praise "Palestinian territories" and tried to remove it throughout Misplaced Pages. At the time the title was given that title it only contained what is now the "Governance (since 1948)" section, it didn't contain the "Sub-topics" section. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 21:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

It's verbalism. Do not turn the subject into geography. It's WP:OR and not template-worthy. It only makes sense for Palestinian territories/State of Palestine/Palestinian National Authority. In the absence of one clear name, one of these used. And to put template called {{Governance of Palestine from 1948}}/"History of the Palestinian territories," with Palestinian flag/emblem, to Judea article is nonsense, as you did earlier with Kingdom of Judah and Tribe of Judah (LOL).--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 22:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Why, it's subject is political geography. The Judea article states "Judea or Judæa is the name of the mountainous southern part of the Land of Israel, roughly corresponding to the southern West Bank." So it's OR to put articles about the history of the southern West Bank into the Palestinian territories template. Is it also nonsense and OR to put {{History of Jordan}} with the Jordanian flag/emblem into Transjordan (Bible). Should the Jordan template only deal with Arab history in Jordan/Transjordan? If not, explain why the this is different. Sense when did country/territory history templates stop dealing with periods from before the present day inhabitants arrived; there are a few like that such as {{History of Turkey}}, but that's the exception, not the rule.

You seem to want to turn the territories template into an "Arab History in Palestine" template. That's an argument you could make, but then the template becomes an "Arab history in Palestine" not a "History of the Palestinian territories" template. The Palestinian territories is as different from Palestine as Palestine is form the Levant. They each have their own templates: {{History of the Levant}}, {{History of Palestine}} and {{History of the Palestinian territories}}. As you go through these templates, they deal with the history of an area that is within, but smaller, then the area dealt with in the proceeding template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk • contribs) 23:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

{{History of Syria}} contains info well before the Arabs arrived in Syria. Same with {{History of Iraq}} and {{History of Egypt}}. This is clearly not OR, if it was there's no way it could have been done in so many templates. You haven't offered any reason to treat the Territories template any differently then the others, except by pointing to {{History of Palestine}}, but by the same standard the non-Arab history ought to be removed from the Syria and Jordan template's and transfered to {{History of the Levant}}. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 01:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

These comparisons are incorrect. You trying to duplicate existing History of Palestine template in the template about modern country. Name "Judea" is of Hebrew origin and is used in context of Jewish history. West Bank is West Bank. And also, Judea is the name for geographic region not period, it don't belongs to history template.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 04:05, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Historically the PT has not been one unit so it made sense to divide the template into Ancient West Bank and Ancient Gaza Strip sections. All the articles I found dealing with the Ancient West Bank dealt spicily with the southern West Bank (AKA Judea) hence the rename of the Ancient West Bank section to "Judea (southern West Bank)". It doesn't try to duplicate the Palestine template because it deals specifiably with the territories. It's just articles specifiably about the territories that go there such as Yehud Medinata, which was roughly in what is today the southern West Bank. ({{History of Algeria}} and {{History of Libya}} also cover non-Arab history)

Criticizing the templates origination or terminology is not an argument for saying that the template's scope is incorrect. The southern West Bank has allot of Jewish and non-Arab history, so does Jordan, yet the Jordan template has Biblical Transjordan. Why are my comparisons incorrect? I don't see the difference between the situations, but you do. Jordan and Syria don't limit themselves to Arab history and cover non-Arab history to a template that deals with a larger area (Levant); why should the territories only deal with Arab history and leave dealing with non-Arab history to a template that deals with a larger area (Palestine). Your the one arguing that the territories template should differ from the all the other Arab country/territory history templates, so it's your job to explain why this template should differ. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm restoring the template from the articles you removed it from, as you haven't provided a reason to treat the template differently then the all the other Arab country/territory history templates; and there is no conciseness to narrow the templates scope to just Arab history. You do have a good point about the template being too geographic, so I renamed that section "Ancient Judea (southern West Bank)" and removed "modern southern west bank". I think it's fine to have separate sections for the Ancient southern west bank and Ancient Gaza strip under the circumstances tough, regather then mixing them tougher. If you want to continue to contest the template's scope I'm open to further discussion, and I'm open to the possibility of treating this template differently then the others if there is some reason, unrelated to semantics and the templates origination, to do so. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution.

Guide for participants If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form. What this noticeboard is: It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction. What this noticeboard is not: It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct. It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums. It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN. It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy. Things to remember: Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page. Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~". If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage. Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! —Theopolisme (talk) 00:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Awaiting replies Hi Triggerhippie: we're awaiting your replies at Misplaced Pages:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Template:Governance_of_Palestine_from_1948, and I'd appreciate it if you'd take a moment to comment there. Thanks! —Theopolisme (talk) 20:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Index of Israel-related articles Hello, Triggerhippie4. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Index of Israel-related articles, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted: edit the page remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}} save the page Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, GAtechnical (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Boston Marathon bombings I've reverted your addition. Whether such a link ought to be included should be a matter of consensus. An article of such importance, with this much traffic, has a talk page, and that's where you should have gone first, in my opinion. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Apology I am terribly sorry, my eyes are so puffy from allergies I mistook your edit for vandalism. Please accept my sincere apology and a cookie: I'm sorry :( Deputy leaders of the thirty-third Israeli government Could you help me with this? I don't know who are the current Head of the Government Deputies.--Michael Zeev (talk) 03:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC) Template:Thirty-third government of Israel I see you've created this template and have started adding it to the articles. Please don't - I really don't think these templates are a good idea, and want to stop them spreading before it's too hard. There have been so many governments that it's really not worth it. Some ministers have been members of over 10, so it would result in a ridiculous number of navboxes on their pages. We already have one for each ministerial post (e.g. {{Israeli Agriculture Ministers}}). Thanks, Number 57 11:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Ok, agree. Should it be {{Current government of Israel}} instead, as with {{Current MKs}}?--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 11:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Cool :) I'm kind of torn on having one for the current government. I can see the attraction, but I'm worried it might end up being kept and a new one created when the 34th is created... Perhaps we could build it into the current MKs template - perhaps another group at the bottom with the ministers' positions? I'll draft one later. Number 57 11:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC) I just noticed that the MKs template contains info on the current cabinet. Now I guess {{Current government of Israel}} should be redirected to the MKs template.--Triggerhippie4 (talk) 12:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Should {{Current government of Israel}} be like in Hebrew wiki? Without sorting by party, but with info on which ministry every person is minister of. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC) I was planning on just having a separate line on the Current MK template similar to the Hebrew version of the Minister template. Number 57 13:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Which Hebrew template do you mean? I'm talking about translating this in to this. It has info on the particular ministries. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Yes - that template, but adding it in truncated form to the bottom of Current MKs. Something along the lines of Prime Minister: Netanyahu - Agriculture: Shamir. Will do a full example this evening to show you. Number 57 13:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Sometimes a minister is not MK, so having all the ministers in the MKs template will be wrong. Also the template is already quite large. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 13:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC) It may be too big - I wanted to see how small I could make the separate section. Will do that shortly and let you know. We could always rename it "Current Members of the Knesset and Government Ministers" if it did look ok... We shall see! Number 57 16:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Well, I managed to make the section quite small, but I'm not sure it's much use. Perhaps a separate template is the way to go. However, I've noticed a lot of errors on {{Current government of Israel}} - I take it that it's still a work in progress? Number 57 18:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC) What errors? --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 21:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 16 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 kidnapping of Israeli teens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC) external links deletion with no why I notice a lot of editors have asked you about edit summaries and I noticed you removed the channel4 coverage about gaza-israel conflict with no rationale - it is polite if you are asked isn't it to , add an edit summary sometimes - - I don't know why you deleted the channel4 coverage - you must have something against channel 4 I guess. anyhow I think like others that sometimes you should leave some explanation of edits. Sayerslle (talk) 22:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Sorry Sorry bout that - thought it was a link to related article. Legacypac (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Take it easy Your edit was reverted here, and I really think that was the right thing to do. You can't just make any change you like without discussion. A triggerhippie shouldn't be too trigger happy. Debresser (talk) 23:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Judas Maccabeus I thought you deleted some of the format on the article, didn't know you moved it. Srry about the revert. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC) January 2015 Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) I noticed your recent edit to Charlie Hebdo shooting does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in: User contributions Recent changes Watchlists Revision differences IRC channels Related changes New pages list and Article editing history Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of 09:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC) March 2015 Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snuggums (talk / edits) 08:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC) You thought no one would notice you continuing to introduce more and more reviews in the article. Stop now and open a discussion in the talk page. —Indian:BIO 09:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC) It's not me now. Pitchfork is notable publication so of course other editors adding it. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Israeli–Palestinian conflict (2015) In accordance, with WP:1RR you have reverts more than once and are liable for a block. Kindly discuss reverts. I have moved the MFA from the EL to the page itself and are hence using your links not removing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lihaas‎ (talk • contribs) 03:00, 16 October 2015 Arbitration PI This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date. Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.  In addition to the discretionary sanctions a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, editors may be blocked without warning if they breach this restriction. Please review this section for more information. Template:Z33 Gizmocorot (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Amir Ohana Hi, I've put back the photograph of Amir attending gay pride in Tel Aviv, since I don't understand your rationale for deleting it. Please, do not remove it. If you have any concerns, I am happy to discuss it. Thank you and Shalom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC) February 2016: RR3 Warning You will get blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Israelis. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 79.183.130.71 (talk) 15:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)