| Revision as of 00:21, 8 March 2016 editMarvin 2009 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users721 edits →Epoch Times: mistook a date← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:17, 8 March 2016 edit undoHappymonsoonday1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users915 edits →Discretionary sanctions on the Epoch Times page: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | ||
| Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Discretionary sanctions on the Epoch Times page == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> <span style="text-shadow:#000000 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em">]<font color="Gray"> '''''monsoon''''' </font>]</span> 19:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:17, 8 March 2016
 Archives |
HAPPY LUNAR NEW YEAR
WP:INFOBOXFLAG
I noticed that you removed some of the flags from icon boxes, because of WP:INFOBOXFLAG Which is something that I agree with, now that I am aware of it.
You might want to keep an eye out for the edits of this guy https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Valentinaitaly
I'm sure he means well, but he is adding the flags to a lot of the beauty pageant articles. I've sent him a message, so he might stop, but there might be a lot of articles that need these flags removed. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 05:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware of him/her having a habit of waving flag in infoboxes. If he/she still doesn't stop, maybe the ANI would deal with it. STSC (talk) 01:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- I just checked their user page, they just got indef block for being a sock of User:Colombiabeauty. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 11:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Why did you remove Category:Massacres committed by China?
You didn't provide a reason in the edit summary and I'm curious. Jackninja5 (talk) 19:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, that explains a lot and thanks for replying on my talk page instead of your own because it actually gets me a notification. :P Jackninja5 (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, Wiki would ping you. STSC (talk) 04:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; according to the reverts you have made on Epoch Times. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Marvin 2009 (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Discussion at ANI
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 06:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 24 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Miss International page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions on the Epoch Times page
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Falun Gong, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.