Misplaced Pages

:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:00, 22 October 2016 editThomas.W (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,972 edits →User-reported: typos← Previous edit Revision as of 21:06, 22 October 2016 edit undoSanAnMan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,070 edits Reporting 72.70.163.227. (TW)Next edit →
Line 39: Line 39:
*{{IPvandal|2601:243:500:510A:1CD5:A8A1:3405:209B}} – On ]:. Adding vanity trivia. ] (]) 19:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC) *{{IPvandal|2601:243:500:510A:1CD5:A8A1:3405:209B}} – On ]:. Adding vanity trivia. ] (]) 19:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
*{{IPvandal|206.45.160.22}} – On ]: vandalism after final warning. IP keeps tripping edit filter on ], along with multiple level 4 warnings for vandalism. -- '''] ]''' 20:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC) *{{IPvandal|206.45.160.22}} – On ]: vandalism after final warning. IP keeps tripping edit filter on ], along with multiple level 4 warnings for vandalism. -- '''] ]''' 20:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
*{{IPvandal|72.70.163.227}} – On ]: vandalism after final warning. Continuous removal of content and failure to follow ] on this page and others including ] with multiple warnings issued. ] (]) 21:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:06, 22 October 2016

"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. Shortcut

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 23:39 on 17 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
    Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Katie 11:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
    @KrakatoaKatie: Question: Isn't the username violation alone enough for a block? Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
    I prepared a report against Roman Frankiv without knowing that Jim1138 had already reported him, and since I have it I might as well add it: Repeated POV removal of sourced content (, ), removal of sourced content and replacing it with unsourced/OR content (, , ) and disrutive editing bordering on vandalism (), in spite of multiple warnings and (utterly failed) attempts by both myself and Iryna Harpy to discuss it with him, edits that have been going on for several days.- Tom | Thomas.W 21:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
    Categories:
    Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions Add topic