Misplaced Pages

Talk:Francis Petre: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:59, 2 September 2006 editNifboy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,707 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:32, 10 September 2006 edit undoKingbotk (talk | contribs)447,274 editsm Bot (FAQ) (Plugin) Tag Category:Biography articles needing priority parameter replacement. importance→priority.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPBiography
|class=FA
|priority=Mid
}}
{{Architecture}} {{Architecture}}


{{featured}} {{featured}}
{{WPCD-People}} {{WPCD-People}}
{{WPBiography|class=FA|importance=Mid}}
{{Mainpage date|May 6|2005}} {{Mainpage date|May 6|2005}}
{{Talk Spoken Misplaced Pages|Francis_Petre.ogg}} {{Talk Spoken Misplaced Pages|Francis_Petre.ogg}}

Revision as of 23:32, 10 September 2006

WikiProject iconBiography FA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
FAThis article has been rated as FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconArchitecture Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Template:Featured article is only for Misplaced Pages:Featured articles. Template:WPCD-People

Template:Mainpage date

WikiProject iconSpoken Misplaced Pages
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Misplaced Pages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Misplaced Pages

Template:V0.5

Featured article review of November 20, 2005

This review resulted in the passing of a new version of the article.
  • This quote which was in the article when it was an original FAC, is from the link to St. Joseph's's cathedral which too has always been listed. References and links are given so people can check facts. Perhaps people should check these out before claiming lack of references. Giano | talk 10:18, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Changes since being promoted on April 19, 2005. This is the version that was promoted. Changes are minor but significant and seem to be positive. Tuf-Kat 04:52, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

  • One of the best articles I've read. Changes have been positive. Well, except for this edit. I'm not an expert in em dashes but I don't think this is a correct usage. It appears the subject of the phrase ("styles") is lost inside the dashes leaving the "the" referring to...well, I'm not sure what. --maclean25 08:09, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure if you are correct about em dash or not, butI reworded the sentence in question to make the point moot. If this change is not reverted, I will pass this review in a few days (assuming no other issues are brought up). Tuf-Kat 09:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
      • Thank you, that clears it up. Two minor imperfections in the article include an unreferenced quotation in the "Architect" section (with quotation marks in a block quote) and a one sentence introduction-section to "Cathedrals" (and it doesn't end with a period). --maclean25 07:36, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Francis Petre: Difference between revisions Add topic