Revision as of 11:28, 24 April 2017 editMrX (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,648 edits →2017 Jerusalem Light Rail stabbing: you should not have restored the material← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:35, 24 April 2017 edit undoE.M.Gregory (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users45,004 edits →2017 Jerusalem Light Rail stabbing: sighNext edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:::*Can you explain why you removed the material in the first place, when it was souced to a noted terrorism expert and a ] newspaper in addition to the Daily Mail sourcing?] (]) 11:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | :::*Can you explain why you removed the material in the first place, when it was souced to a noted terrorism expert and a ] newspaper in addition to the Daily Mail sourcing?] (]) 11:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::*The sources are (mostly) poor quality and the material is speculative. You were not supposed to restore it without obtaining consensus. You are now in violation of the discretionary sanction restrictions which probably will not bode well for you considering your substantial bludgeoning at the AfD.- ]] 11:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | ::::*The sources are (mostly) poor quality and the material is speculative. You were not supposed to restore it without obtaining consensus. You are now in violation of the discretionary sanction restrictions which probably will not bode well for you considering your substantial bludgeoning at the AfD.- ]] 11:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::*I see no justification for your disparagement of the ] or ] as "poor quality" sources. Both so take political positions with which you and Fram disagree. But that is no justification for deleting the material.] (]) 11:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:35, 24 April 2017
For the Misplaced Pages encyclopedia article, see Reader.Nishidani
I have warned that user a few times against making personal attacks against you at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2017 Jerusalem Light Rail stabbing, but clearly he has been continuing and has just verbally dismissed my warnings. I'm seriously considering reporting him somewhere. Do you know where the best place for that is? Cyrus the Penner (talk) 07:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- User:Cyrus the Penner. Well, that is certainly a condescending and aggressive edit. Nishdani, is a passionate, aggressive editor with an intensely partisan, anti-Israel POV. I believe that when he makes comments like that to new-ish editors, they, like his bouts of angry editing on pages like Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2017 Jerusalem Light Rail stabbing, are not merely a reflection of his of WP:OWN attitude towards I/P-related topics, but a form of political activism intended to WP:DISRUPT the project by provoking editors he disagrees with politically to lose their tempers and do something so foolish that they get blocked. The goal here, in my opinion, is to make I/P related editing so time-consuming and aversive that editors avoid I/P-related topics, leaving the field open for the creation and maintenance of POV articles. That said, the proper place to register a complaint about Nishdani's editing is on the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.E.M.Gregory (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Okay. Thank you. Cyrus the Penner (talk) 08:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Just posted the complaint. I would appreciate it if you helped out by giving your side of the story and probably clarify on some details (I might not have worded my argument efficiently enough). Cyrus the Penner (talk) 09:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Murder of Georgios Tsibouktzakis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Georgios Tsibouktzakis is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Murder of Georgios Tsibouktzakis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Disgraceful campaign to discredit us
The coordinated effort to discredit us over at ANI is astounding, mind-boggling really. I never knew people on Misplaced Pages are capable of going out of their way to shut us truthful users down just because we are disseminating information they don't want us to disseminate to the public. Smfh. Cyrus the Penner (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Now they're trying to ban me! Talk about total disrespect! Well, if that goes in their favor, it was nice knowing you. Better watch out, they might come for you too when they get the chance. Cyrus the Penner (talk) 07:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- And guess what? THEY JUST TRIED TO! Stay on your toes, man! Cyrus the Penner (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Trolled
I've been trolled. Just got pinged with this:
- "Looks like you were correct E.M.Gregory. User:Cyrus the Penner is a confirmed sock to User:DisuseKid who had expressed desire to drag you down (). EvergreenFir (talk) 15:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)"
- This place is a swamp.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:58, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Please check my grammar
I have updated the article.--Shrike (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
2017 Jerusalem Light Rail stabbing
This is not "reliably sourced material", it is sourced to an opinion piece (which is not allowed as a source for such statements of fact), and to the Daily Mail, which is no longer allowed as a source since the recent RfChere. Please self-revert the article. Fram (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- This material now sourced to other newspapers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Using The Sun and the Daily Express, some of the worst examples of the trash tablois press, isn't much better. The third source you used is just repeating the Daily Mail. Isn't this neutrally covered in any somewhat reliable quality sources instead of all this? Fram (talk) 11:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Can you explain why you removed the material in the first place, when it was souced to a noted terrorism expert and a WP:RS newspaper in addition to the Daily Mail sourcing?E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- The sources are (mostly) poor quality and the material is speculative. You were not supposed to restore it without obtaining consensus. You are now in violation of the discretionary sanction restrictions which probably will not bode well for you considering your substantial bludgeoning at the AfD.- MrX 11:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I see no justification for your disparagement of the Times of Israel or Itamar Marcus as "poor quality" sources. Both so take political positions with which you and Fram disagree. But that is no justification for deleting the material.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)