| Revision as of 04:10, 31 May 2017 editMajora (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,430 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of File:Peter Dinklage Animal rights.jpg. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:57, 31 May 2017 edit undoAffeL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,562 edits →Speedy deletion nomination of File:Peter Dinklage Animal rights.jpgNext edit → | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | == Your ] nomination of ]== | ||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 15:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) | Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 15:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Misplaced Pages use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of ]. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Misplaced Pages under one of the ] then: | |||
| * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. | |||
| * add the relevant ] and if necessary, a complete ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=File%3APeter+Dinklage+Animal+rights.jpg|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-noncom-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 04:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:57, 31 May 2017
A Barnstar for you
|
The Writer's Barnstar | |
| For your excellent work creating character articles for A Song of Ice and Fire. Keep up the great work! IdenticalHetero (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Game of Thrones
The article Game of Thrones you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Game of Thrones for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Peter Dinklage
The article Peter Dinklage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Dinklage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RL0919 -- RL0919 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
True Detective
|
Congratulations, it's a... |
| ...Misplaced Pages Good Article!! Shearonink (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC) |
Yay.. thanks for the review and all. - AffeL (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of True Detective
The article True Detective you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:True Detective for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 04:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Jon Snow
Hi, I made a few edits on Kit Harington's page. I saw you nominated it for GA. Great job! I hope to see it pass. Let me know if you have any questions. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 02:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. - AffeL (talk) 14:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Kit Harington
Here's my thought process. This is either a) Kit Harington, not wanting to publicise his relationship with Rose Leslie on Misplaced Pages, b) the reverse, c) a vandal screwing about. WP:AGF says we can't choose option c) if a) and b) are within the bounds of plausibility. If the IP comes back again, drop me a line and I'll have a look - if they're not prepared to communicate with us though, we can't do anything. Ritchie333 12:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Both Kit and Rose have been public about their relationship(See:(Min: 4.24) and ) If the ip user comes back, I will inform you. - AffeL (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- What if they've just had an almighty row and split up? Not that I would wish that to happen particularly, but sometimes that's just the way life goes. Ritchie333 12:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- They where seen togheter just a day ago at an event in England, as a couple, holding hands and kissing. So, I don't believe they have parted ways, Even if they hade, a source is needed to confirm it. - AffeL (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- What if they've just had an almighty row and split up? Not that I would wish that to happen particularly, but sometimes that's just the way life goes. Ritchie333 12:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- And they said romance was dead :-) ... okay, I'm leaning more towards option c) now. Ritchie333 13:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, in my warped imagination I have thought of d) a 27-year old bespectacled geek with suspicious facial hair who can't stand that that beastly Mr Harington had the gall to date the delectable Ms Leslie and decides to blank all mention on the internet to make him feel better. However, in practical terms that is close enough to c) anyway, and also d) is more likely not to be an anon IP, but an admin on Commons. (ooooh) Ritchie333 13:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hahah...Yeah, I would not be surprised if that was the case. - AffeL (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333: The suspicious facial hair guy is back. - AffeL (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, in my warped imagination I have thought of d) a 27-year old bespectacled geek with suspicious facial hair who can't stand that that beastly Mr Harington had the gall to date the delectable Ms Leslie and decides to blank all mention on the internet to make him feel better. However, in practical terms that is close enough to c) anyway, and also d) is more likely not to be an anon IP, but an admin on Commons. (ooooh) Ritchie333 13:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Banhammered. Ritchie333 14:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333:. That guy is back, using another ip adress. Wow, he really can't stand Harington and Leslie being a couple. - AffeL (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Right, protected it for a week. That should keep things at bay. Ritchie333 18:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
References
Barnstar for you
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| This Special Barnstar is for all the hard work you have done on List of awards and nominations received by Game of Thrones during the last few months. Kingstoken (talk) 23:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Kit Harington
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kit Harington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)