Revision as of 21:42, 31 May 2017 editJezebelle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,381 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:49, 31 May 2017 edit undoJezebelle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,381 edits →ReferencesNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
You could change the wording to "has been described as far-right". That's not biased and is an adequate way of dealing with your issue. --'''<font color="#E466A9">]</font><font color="#E466A9"></font>''' 21:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC) | You could change the wording to "has been described as far-right". That's not biased and is an adequate way of dealing with your issue. --'''<font color="#E466A9">]</font><font color="#E466A9"></font>''' 21:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
EDIT: Done. If anyone else has any comments on this, please use this page. --'''<font color="#E466A9">]</font><font color="#E466A9"></font>''' 21:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:49, 31 May 2017
United States Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
References
This article is shit and contains 3 shitty references that call proud boys far right so i guess they must be cause well we're calling them that, after all the sky is green because I say it's green. One of the 3 shit references contradicts this article by stating PB is a fight club but this article says FOAK is the fight club part of PB, which is it? I watched the video that reference 2 describes and the AP "reporter" is clearly writing from a partisan viewpoint and obviously a total cunt.
You could change the wording to "has been described as far-right". That's not biased and is an adequate way of dealing with your issue. --Aleccat 21:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
EDIT: Done. If anyone else has any comments on this, please use this page. --Aleccat 21:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Categories: