| Revision as of 07:53, 13 June 2018 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,383,013 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Ad Orientem/Archive 9. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:16, 13 June 2018 edit undoTonyBallioni (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers49,329 edits →Saudi Arabia ECP: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| :Nevermind, it looks like ] already took care of it. ] (]) 06:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC) | :Nevermind, it looks like ] already took care of it. ] (]) 06:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::Great. -] (]) 13:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC) | ::Great. -] (]) 13:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == Saudi Arabia ECP == | |||
| Hi Ad, I've been going through Middle Eastern Countries in light of the ] about ]. The consensus there was that the article on the whole country was broadly but not ''reasonably'' construed to be in the ARPIA topic area (there is apparently a difference: the committee imposed sanctions are reasonably construed while discretionary sanctions are broadly construed.){{pb}}Anyway, the two other Arab countries I found that were under ECP were Saudi Arabia and Lebanon. I took Lebanon to AN (]) and the emerging consensus there is that the ] page is outside of the restrictions. I've read over the Saudi article again, and I think it probably is too. My gut here says that the only two country/national entity articles at this time that are under the restrictions should be ] and ], but that is obviously my gut and not consensus.{{pb}}Anyway, would you mind reviewing your protection there and telling me what you think? If you'd rather test consensus at AE or AN, I'm also fine with that. I'm just trying to get some semblance of uniformity in that area {{smiley}} ] (]) 13:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:16, 13 June 2018
 | Welcome! Please read this before posting here.
If you have questions comments or concerns feel free to drop me a line below. Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, and remember to sign your topic with ~~~~.Click here to start a new topic. |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Looks like Tjdrum2000 is back again
Using 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:AA. Ss112 01:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- And Special:Contributions/2600:387:B:9:0:0:0:84 and Special:Contributions/2600:387:B:9:0:0:0:70. Maybe another rangeblock is in order... Ss112 08:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Blocked x 6 months. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
User OxfordLaw
This user continue to violate 3-RR and keep edit warring misconduct. Please care to check? Special:Contributions/OxfordLaw Mr.User200 (talk) 13:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry this report is now stale. If this editor is still engaging in in disruptive behavior please take it to one of our noticeboards such as WP:3RRN or WP:ANI. I am on vacation and won't be back for a couple of days yet, so time sensitive issues should not be posted here for the time being. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Remove talk page access of Addisu mamo
Hello,
You may want to remove talk page access of Addisu mamo . Hummerrocket (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
A New Subject
Welcome back from your vacation, AO! I would like to establish a new subject on the Southern aristocracy, but the page currently redirects to Plantations in the American South. How does one go about this? Am I to delete the redirect and begin contributing, or does the current page need deleting before the page can be used for content? – Conservatrix (talk) 06:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Though reliable sources often employ the term "aristocracy," I could alternatively use Planter class to avoid its pointed nature. – Conservatrix (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Good morning Conservatrix.
I suggest you that propose the redirect for deletion (WP:PROD}. If no one objects the redirect will be deleted in seven days.The redirect has no substantial history of editing so I don't think it will be controversial. Just explain you want to create an article with that title. -Ad Orientem (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)- Ack. I just noticed that PROD can't be used with redirects which seems odd. Send it to RfD or nominate it for CSD (G6). -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
173.69.144.245
173.69.144.245 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
It looks like BlaccCrab (talk · contribs) is back to using this IP again pretty much immediately after your 3 month block on them expired. Could you block them again? Thanks. 37.106.180.252 (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Nevermind, it looks like NeilN already took care of it. 37.106.180.252 (talk) 06:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Great. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Saudi Arabia ECP
Hi Ad, I've been going through Middle Eastern Countries in light of the recent AE thread about Jordan. The consensus there was that the article on the whole country was broadly but not reasonably construed to be in the ARPIA topic area (there is apparently a difference: the committee imposed sanctions are reasonably construed while discretionary sanctions are broadly construed.)
Anyway, the two other Arab countries I found that were under ECP were Saudi Arabia and Lebanon. I took Lebanon to AN (see thread) and the emerging consensus there is that the Lebanon page is outside of the restrictions. I've read over the Saudi article again, and I think it probably is too. My gut here says that the only two country/national entity articles at this time that are under the restrictions should be Israel and State of Palestine, but that is obviously my gut and not consensus.
Anyway, would you mind reviewing your protection there and telling me what you think? If you'd rather test consensus at AE or AN, I'm also fine with that. I'm just trying to get some semblance of uniformity in that area 
TonyBallioni (talk) 13:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)