| Revision as of 22:38, 9 July 2018 editObjective3000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,066 editsm ce← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:34, 9 July 2018 edit undoTonyBallioni (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers49,329 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits on Talk:Donald Trump. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| Note the above message explicitly calls upon editors working in this area to follow our ]. This includes following our ] and refraining from casting ]. So, please exercise more discretion with what you're saying when posting to talk pages or you'll probably find yourself topic banned. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC) | Note the above message explicitly calls upon editors working in this area to follow our ]. This includes following our ] and refraining from casting ]. So, please exercise more discretion with what you're saying when posting to talk pages or you'll probably find yourself topic banned. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] and for which creates a distrustful editing environment on a highly controversial subject. on the page ], you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] (specifically ]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the ] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following ] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Revision as of 23:34, 9 July 2018
GrecoArm, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi GrecoArm! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
July 2018
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Donald Trump. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 - MrX 🖋 11:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Note the above message explicitly calls upon editors working in this area to follow our standards of behavior. This includes following our civility policy and refraining from casting aspersions. So, please exercise more discretion with what you're saying when posting to talk pages or you'll probably find yourself topic banned. --NeilN 19:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."