Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jprw: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:25, 25 July 2018 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots671,264 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit Revision as of 07:09, 28 July 2018 edit undoJprw (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,935 edits updateTag: BlankingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
]
]
]

Congratulations on ''The Rage.'' Is this your second GA? It's hard to tell--you don't show off your accomplishments. &ndash; ] <sup>(])</sup> 08:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I think I'm approaching the half-dozen mark. For the time being I hope to continue to concentrate (time permitting, of course) on conservative-orientated contemporary publications. In addition, the ] article is in need of quite serious attention, after being the subject of quite partisan editing in the past. But we're talking a lot of work to redress the balance there. Regards, ] (]) 08:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

== Thatcher ==

I am disappointed that you again removed material which is referenced to reliable sources and which was agreed by consensus. Could you please wait for a new consensus to form before removing it again? Thank you. --] (]) 18:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

== Rage against god ==

Hi Jprw. {{user|He to Hecuba}} has been declared a banned sock puppet. Since he conducted a review of your article, which has since been deleted, I have initiated a ] to evaluate the Good status. Hopefully there will not be much to do and we can reaffirm the GA status. ]&nbsp;] 14:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay, how disturbing – but thanks for letting me know. ] (]) 15:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

:Sorry for the delay. I have something up now. ]&nbsp;] 04:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

== 2012 WikiGrail ==
]
Hi there! I was admiring your great work on Christianity-related articles, which made me think you should sign up for the ]. It is a friendly competition for Christianity-related project members that awards points for good articles, featured content, and other markers of editing skill. You simply just have to list your name ]. Hope to see you there! Warm regards, &ndash; ] <sup>(])</sup> 09:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

==Clint Eastwood==
Given that the entire article was written by myself and Nehrams and the article underwent a vigorous GA review I'd say we'd have spotted that at the time. The Cincentta studio and Leone contacts in Rome is important to mention given its links with Itaiian cinema and how Clint became so well known in Italy. The fact that the film was shot in a small Andusalian village is very relevant given that they returend to the location and that it was not shot in Italy and Clint spent at least 11 weeks of his life there. It is also relevant as background information because of the fact the crew shouted "Vaya" which is Spanish during the bridge shooting scene, documented further down. Both are very well documented in our biographical material on Clint. I'm going to ask Nehrams his opinion on this but my feeling is that the brief production info is very relevant to his biography. Remember that "opinions are like assholes, everybody has one of them", so it is just your opinion that its not relevant.♦ ] 18:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

I am new to the article and that bit stood out like a sore thumb as I was reading it – it is clearly too much detail, and I'm sure it's better off in the article about the film. As for "underwent a vigorous GA review" I found other problems in the lead alone. No doubt there will be more. And please try and be a bit more civil in your discourse, thanks. ] (]) 18:21, 9 March 2012 (UT

They happen to be his highest commercially successful films and his only comedies and are clearly relevant. Oh, and you're hardly one to lecture on civility with degrading comments like . Somebody has clearly put a lot of work into that article and its quite unpleasant for people who have put a lot of hard work into an article for you to come along and imply its rubbish.♦ ] 18:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

I actually think that it is a fantastic article, and the changes I am making are only with a view to improving it. The fact that you have put in such a huge amount of work surely does not mean that it cannot be tweaked / improved here and there; after all, you do not .

Fair enough re: the success of the comedies, but I've tweaked the wording. Also, listing all the DH films in the lead seems excessive, the hyperlink does that job for us fine (in contrast, the SW trio are all so iconic that they probably deserve an individual mention). ] (]) 06:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Thankyou for your comments. Sorry, if I was a bit heavy handed with you yesterday, I can see now that you are a very good copyeditor. But when somebody makes some notable changes to something that's been there a long time the first reaction is to question it. The article has been heavily researched and we wanted it to be as comprehensive as possible. Sometime I wish to nominate for FA, so I would ask for some assistance in this, if you are interested.♦ ] 17:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply and I can understand that you were worried by what may have been appeared to be a bull-in-a-china shop approach on my part. As and when time permits I would love to help out in any FA nomination process; I think the article has massive potential in this respect – the groundwork has been put in and it should be just a question of tweaking / fine tuning, etc. ] (]) 12:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

== Douglas Murray ==
Murray's anti-Irish sentiments are well known and the Irish jokes incident is in indicator of how that man thinks. I've restored the section on his attempts to popularise and defend Irish jokes. ] (]) 19:04, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your evident antipathy towards Murray is clearly causing you to think irrationally about this issue. Not only is the accusation a bad case of synthesis, but throwaway remarks should not make up whole sections of biographies of living persons on WP. It is both misleading and irrelevant and needs to go. ] (]) 05:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

I'd actually say that your evident admiration for Murray is making you behave in a censorious manner. The section will be restored and if you continue to vandalise the article you will be reported. ] (]) 12:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Can we continue this on the DM talk page? Cheers (will copy over). ] (]) 06:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

I've opened a formal dispute regarding this as I don't think we can now resolve this between ourselves. ] (]) 11:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "]". Thank you.<!--Template:DRN-notice--> --] (]) 12:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jprw, happy with your new edits on the Douglas Murray article. ] (]) 21:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Great, I'll leave it to other editors to pare down what seems a too-detalied description of the Irish Jokes incident. ] (]) 09:17, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

== The Master and His Emissary ==

Hi, have left a reply to your note at ]. Regards, <b><font color="green">]</font>+<font color="blue">]</font></b> 18:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks will check it out. ] (]) 18:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

== Thank you for your thank you. ==

Why thank you. But I am not entirely sure what I did to deserve it....<span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:orange" > ] ]</span> 13:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

An instructive correction :) ] (]) 13:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
:Where? lol <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:orange" > ] ]</span> 15:38, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

The Homeland page, I was unaware of the procedure for listing characters. ] (]) 18:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

== ANI ==

Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The article is ]. Thank you. ] - ] 16:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

== Main page appearance: Liverpool F.C. in European football ==

This is a note to let the main editors of ] know that the article will be appearing as ] on February 12, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at ]. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or his delegates {{user|Dabomb87}}, {{user|Gimmetoo}}, and {{user|Bencherlite}}, or start a discussion at ]. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at ]. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

<blockquote>
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">]</div>
''']''' in ] (UEFA) competitions. Since 1964, ] have won eleven European trophies: the ] (formerly known as the European Cup) five times, the ] (formerly known as the UEFA Cup) three times, and the ] three times. Liverpool qualified for European competitions for 21&nbsp;consecutive seasons until the ], the occasion of the ], following which the club was banned from Europe for six seasons. Since being readmitted, they have qualified for the Champions League eight times and the UEFA Cup seven times. As a result of their victory in the ], Liverpool won the ] trophy ''(pictured)'' outright. ] is the club's most successful manager in Europe, with five trophies. Liverpool's biggest win in Europe is an 11–0 victory over ] in the ]. In European competitions, ] holds the club record for the most appearances, with 139, and ] is the club's record goalscorer, with 38&nbsp;goals. {{TFAFULL|Liverpool F.C. in European football}}
</blockquote>
] (]) 23:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
{{clear}}

==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this newly created ''']''' will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
:<b>All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.</b>

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Ed West (journalist)|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> -- ] 12:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

== Richard Dawkins ==

] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 19:33, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

==Edit warring while ignoring the talk page at Peter Hitchens==
Ignoring the talk page discussion while edit warring and removing ref'd material at ] isnt going to help your case. Thanks, ♫ ] ] ] 15:52, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

== Liverpool/Bucharest Semi-Final ==

Hi there, I really liked your new article on the Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest European Cup Semi Final. I've nominated it for Did You Know at ]. I think it should get through fairly easily as it is well referenced. The only concerns it may get is that the second paragraph of background isn't referenced and nor is the first paragraph of matches. Other than that it looks top notch. I've put in an initial potential hook in the nomination, but there is a lot of potential hooks from the article so feel free to add them (of course) if you don't like the one I came up with! ] (]) 18:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kind words and support. The Did You Know nomination at ] seems to have been rejected, is that the case? I'm totally unfamiliar with how the DYT process works. Best wishes ] (]) 06:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
:Its still awaiting a review. The line "No QPQ as it isn't a self nom." was added by me - it refers to a requirement for DYK writers with more than five nominations who need to do a ] for any nominations over five. But if you nominate another user's article then there is no requirement to do the review. ] (]) 09:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Roger that, cheers. ] (]) 20:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

==DYK for Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest, 1984 European Cup Semi-Final==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = ]
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that during the 1984 ] Semi-Final between ''']''', ] punched ] in the face, breaking his jaw, but it wasn't seen by the referee?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (] '''·''' ]) 16:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi, you tagged the Johann Hari article for use of primary sources. I was a bit mystified by this, as a quick scan of the sources showed 90% were newspapers and similar. The only primary source I am aware of is Johann Hari's website, which as I understand it would normally be considered acceptable when (for example) describing Hari's views, which is what it's used for here. I've deleted the tag. If you wish to discuss further please start a discussion at the article Talk page. Thanks --] (]) 09:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

== Liverpool vs Dinamo Bucharest ==

Hi Jprw. You probably noticed that I have redirected and protected {{noredirect|Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest, 1984 European Cup Semi-Final}}. This is because I saw a protected edit request at ] where I learned that the page was a recreation of {{noredirect|Liverpool vs Dinamo Bucharest, 1984 European Cup Semi-Final}}, which was deleted at ]. The article looked substantially similar to the article that was deleted, so I wasn't sure whether the new sources that you mentioned were sufficient to overturn the AfD result. If it turns out that they ''are'' sufficient, then I will have no problem with restoring the article, but I think this needs to be done through the proper channels. Could you ask the deleting admin, ], what he thinks of the new version? If he is ok with restoring it, then that will be good enough for me. Alternatively, if Spartaz isn't amenable to restoring the article, you can always submit an appeal to ]. Best regards — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 03:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
== April 2014 ==
] Thank you for contributing to Misplaced Pages. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically ], may fail our ]. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ].<!-- Template:uw-nonfree --> ] (]) 14:35, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for August 23==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

== Deletion of full section ==

I notice an entire section on Roger Scruton was deleted, apparently on the grounds of 'disproportionate weight' being given to the topic. If you look at the talk page, you'll notice there's a lengthy discussion in which you participated, between a number of different posters about whether the 200-odd words are justified. You'll notice that the opinion of the other posters was that it was well referenced, relevant, and had appropriately covered, while your opinion was that it should be "pared down". However rather than editing the section or trying to agree reasonable changes, you simply deleted it entirely!

Please do not delete full sections without justification - particularly where the opinion of other editors has been discussed, debated, and made clear. The talk page is there for major changes to be discussed and agreed. Please use it.] (]) 19:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

== Proposed deletion of Neoconservatism: Why We Need It ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Only one ]'''

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 09:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 -->

== ]: Voting now open! ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jprw. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/29&oldid=750609337 -->

==Disambiguation link notification for March 13==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jprw. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=813406902 -->

== ''The Right Stuff'' June 2018 ==

<!-- HEADER -->
<div style="background-color:#FFFACD;"> <!--:#FFFACD #FFF-->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:5px 5px;">
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;">]</div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:100%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"><span style="white-space:nowrap; line-height:120%; font-size:155%;">June 2018<br /></span></div></div>

<!-- LEFT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:left; width:49%;">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
FROM THE EDITOR<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">The Right Stuff Returns<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of ]. And considering the recent ] the timing could not be better. ''The Right Stuff'' will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Misplaced Pages and in the world. ''The Right Stuff'' welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions ].

Add the ] page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism {{Clickable button 2|Watch|url={{fullurl:Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject_Conservatisam|action=watch}}|style=line-height: 1.5em; padding: 0 1em 0 1em}} ]</div>
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
ARBITRATION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Russian Agents Editing at American Politics?<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

After a ''series of unfortunate events'' largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin {{u|Andrevan}} was the subject of an ] for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including {{u|Winkelvi}} and the notorious {{u|MONGO}}.

Editors who faced Enforcement action include {{u|SPECIFICO}} (no action), {{u|Factchecker atyourservice}} (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), {{u|Netoholic}} (no action) and {{u|Anythingyouwant}} (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). ]</div>

</div><!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
IN THE MEDIA<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Breitbart Versus Misplaced Pages<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

'']'', in response to Facebook's decision to use Misplaced Pages as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The describes the Facebook arrangement as Misplaced Pages's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. ''Breitbart's'' targeting of Misplaced Pages has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to ''Haaretz''. There is no love lost between ''Breitbart'' and Misplaced Pages where editors at the ] have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to ''The Daily Mail''. ]</div>
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Liberty and Trump and Avi, Oh my!<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

<div id="mp-tfa-img" style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0em;">{{main page image|President_Trump_speaking_at_Liberty_University_commencement.jpg|width=220|''President Donald Trump Speaks at Liberty University Commencement Ceremony''|title=Liberty is one of the largest Christian universities in the world and the largest private non-profit university in the United States. Described as a "bastion of the Christian right" in American politics, the university plays a prominent role in Republican politics. President Donald J. Trump gave his first college commencement speech as sitting president at Liberty University.}}<!-- copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Liberty_University&oldid=844931767--> </div>There are several ] at the Project:
{{Block indent|left=0.2|1=<nowiki />
* There is an RFC regarding ] and its relationship to President Trump; see ]
* Activist and commentator ] is listed at AFD; see ]
}}Recently closed discussions include ] which was ], and an ] at ]. ]</div>

</div><div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
<!-- FOOTER -->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:3px;">
{| style="background:none; clear:both; text-align:center; font-size:90%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; width:100%;"
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
|}</div></div></div>
<small>Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Lionelt@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Conservatism/News/Subscribe&oldid=845519790 -->

== ''The Right Stuff:'' July 2018 ==

<!-- HEADER -->
<div style="background-color:#FFFACD;"> <!--:#FFFACD #FFF-->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:5px 5px;">
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;">]</div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:100%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"><span style="white-space:nowrap; line-height:120%; font-size:155%;">July 2018<br /></span></div></div>

<!-- LEFT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:left; width:49%;">
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
DISCUSSION REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

WikiProject Conservatism was a ] at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the ] guideline.

At one point the discussion segued to feedback about ''The Right Stuff.'' Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.
''Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.''

Add the ] page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism {{Clickable button 2|Watch|url={{fullurl:Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject_Conservatisam|action=watch}}|style=line-height: 1.5em; padding: 0 1em 0 1em}} ]</div>
-----
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
ARTICLES REPORT<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

] is the first article promoted at the new ]. Congratulations to {{u|Neveselbert}}. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article ]. ]</div>

</div><!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; ">
RECENT RESEARCH<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Research About AN/I<br /></div>
<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;">
By {{u|Lionelt}}

''Reprinted in part from the ] of The Signpost; written by {{u|Zarasophos}}''

<div style="float:right;margin-left:10px">{{Graph:Chart|width=70|height=70|type=pie|legend=Satisfaction with AN/I|x=Satisfied,Not satisfied|y1=27,73|showValues=}}</div>
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a ] . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "]" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an ]. Some notable takeaways:

* 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
* "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
* "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."

In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at ] and ]. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas ].
]</div>

</div><div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
<!-- FOOTER -->
<div style="border-bottom:3px double #999; border-top:3px double #bbb; padding:3px;">
{| style="background:none; clear:both; text-align:center; font-size:90%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; width:100%;"
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
| width="10%" style="padding-top:3px;" | ]
|}</div></div></div>
<small>Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Lionelt@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Conservatism/News/Subscribe&oldid=846049468 -->

==Disambiguation link notification for July 25==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:09, 28 July 2018

User talk:Jprw: Difference between revisions Add topic