Misplaced Pages

User talk:Volunteer Marek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:20, 12 August 2018 editNarutolovehinata5 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers54,755 editsm Talkback (Template:Did you know nominations/Trump administration family separation policy) (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 21:31, 13 August 2018 edit undoAwilley (talk | contribs)Administrators14,151 edits special discretionary sanctionsNext edit →
Line 50: Line 50:
{{talkback|Template:Did you know nominations/Trump administration family separation policy|ts=02:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)}} {{talkback|Template:Did you know nominations/Trump administration family separation policy|ts=02:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)}}
Please respond on the nomination page if you wish to continue with it. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 02:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC) Please respond on the nomination page if you wish to continue with it. Thanks. ] <sup>]]]]</sup> 02:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

==Special discretionary sanctions==
Please be aware that you are now subject to the following sanctions:
*The No Personal Comments sanction and Thicker Skin sanction outlined at ]

These sanctions are for the topic area of post-1932 politics for a duration of 1 year. The sanctions have been imposed based in part on off-topic remarks about other editors like the comments inside the collapse box at ] dated 88 15:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC).

These sanctions are imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and will be logged ]. Violations of the sanctions will trigger the enforcement procedures outlined at ]. Note that you are extremely unlikely to be topic banned or blocked for accidental violations of the sanctions, provided you are willing to correct your own mistakes without administrative intervention. Also note that these sanctions are intended to enforce good behavioral norms that you should probably be observing anyway.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described ], or directly to me. Please contact me with questions or if anything of the above is unclear.
<span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~] <small>(])</small></span> 21:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:31, 13 August 2018

The Barnstar of Good Humor
"happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Etymology of Szczecin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Etymology of Szczecin is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Etymology of Szczecin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, the nomination edit-conflicted with someone else's revert of the resirect, and I wanted to speedy my nomination, but after the first user commented this is not anymore possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Greater Poland

Nie znam nikogo z obsesją na punkcie Białych Serbów ani nie jestem zbanowany, co Ty wygadujesz?
Co do sekcji, którą usunąłeś to faktycznie nie była oparta o zbyt dobre źródła więc niech tak zostanie.
Domen von Wielkopolska (talk) 17:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Please AGF

Mark, your comments directed at PackMecEng and myself come across as antagonistic rather than civil. Perhaps I'm misreading things but can we try to stick to discussions rather than short one liners? I've tried to push a compromise text later in the discussion. Springee (talk) 02:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Report at AE

--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 13:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

If you self-revert your revert at Yigal Amir, I'll take responsibility for it. --Calton | Talk 13:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Concerns with BOLO edits

Hi, I've noticed that you, myself, and at least one other editor have noticed BOLO's vandalism. This is concerning to say the least. He continues to make political, unilateral edits which disrespect consensus. I'm not familiar with the process to prevent this vandalism, but I wanted to voice my concern to someone who might be. --AlexOvShaolin 03:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Well, it's not vandalism, but it is disruptive. Has he gotten a discretionary sanctions notice? Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
No, I don't believe he has. He just keeps doing edit revision vandalism. He doesn't even accept voted consensus... --AlexOvShaolin 03:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
"vandalism" refers specifically to stuff like putting in "penis" into articles. Complete nonsense stuff. This is just WP:TENDENTIOUS editing and unwillingness to respect talk page discussion. Anyway, I put a notice on his talk page.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Ah I see, the classic "penis" insert into articles. Thanks for clarifying :) AlexOvShaolin 03:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Please don't accuse me of vandalism and make accusations of "political, unilateral edits". Also I'm respecting the talk page discussion on that specific article. You are the only one who is being WP:TENDENTIOUS and not respecting talk page discussion and you have violated WP:MUG several times now. Please stop. BOLO 97 (talk) 03:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Your account became active on August 3rd 2018 and... you know what WP:MUG is? Riiiiggggghhhhhhttttt. When are you going to disclose your other accounts? Anyway, there's five editors on talk that disagree with you, so no, you are not respecting talk page discussion.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Yea and based on all the available evidence 3 of those 5 are probably you so I'm not sure it's a good idea to accuse me of being a sock. BOLO 97 (talk) 04:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Lol. If you really think those are my accounts feel free to raise the concern at WP:ANI or WP:AN or WP:SPI. But you won't because you know they gonna look at your history too, right? Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Bolo, if you stop vandalizing then I will stop accusing you of vandalism. Looking at the talk page, I'm not the only one. Consider your actions in a thoughtful non-political manner.AlexOvShaolin 04:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
I can see what you are doing. I'm not as dumb as you think. The gaslighting you are engaging in is pretty apparent. As far as actions go, Volunteer Marek you're the only one acting political based on a 5 or 6 minute browsing of your many edits. BOLO 97 (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Worth nothing, he admitted to violating the rules then edited his comment --AlexOvShaolin 06:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Stop it with the WP:GASLIGHT I admitted to nothing, THAT IS A BLATANT LIE. You just got caught in one of your many lies, I didn't "admit" anything I altered the word because I realized that I was RESPONDING to your false accusation scumbag. BOLO 97 (talk) 07:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Volunteer Marek. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Trump administration family separation policy.
Message added 02:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please respond on the nomination page if you wish to continue with it. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 02:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Special discretionary sanctions

Please be aware that you are now subject to the following sanctions:

These sanctions are for the topic area of post-1932 politics for a duration of 1 year. The sanctions have been imposed based in part on off-topic remarks about other editors like the comments inside the collapse box at Talk:Donald_Trump/Archive_88 dated 88 15:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC).

These sanctions are imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and will be logged here. Violations of the sanctions will trigger the enforcement procedures outlined at User:Awilley/Special discretionary sanctions#Enforcement: 1-week non-escalating topic ban. Note that you are extremely unlikely to be topic banned or blocked for accidental violations of the sanctions, provided you are willing to correct your own mistakes without administrative intervention. Also note that these sanctions are intended to enforce good behavioral norms that you should probably be observing anyway.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here, or directly to me. Please contact me with questions or if anything of the above is unclear. ~Awilley (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Volunteer Marek: Difference between revisions Add topic