| Revision as of 15:08, 14 August 2018 editGenuineArt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,461 edits Reverted to revision 854896047 by GenuineArt (talk). (TW)Tag: Undo← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:56, 19 August 2018 edit undoDonald Albury (talk | contribs)Administrators62,207 edits →Margot Kidder: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| ::::::I think I was, shouldn't have reverted 2nd time. ] (]) 19:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC) | ::::::I think I was, shouldn't have reverted 2nd time. ] (]) 19:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| {{od|::::::}} Perfect answer, I will lift the block from your account now. Please note, if you edit-war in the future administrators will be less likely to have any lenience on you. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 19:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC) | {{od|::::::}} Perfect answer, I will lift the block from your account now. Please note, if you edit-war in the future administrators will be less likely to have any lenience on you. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 19:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == Margot Kidder == | |||
| I reverted your last edit at ] because you removed the single quote (') after 'Baghdad Betty', but not the one before that phrase. I know that '" looks awkward, but there is a point in having "Baghdad Betty" in quotes. Maybe the sentence can be rephrased to avoid the '". - ] 12:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:56, 19 August 2018
December 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tipu Sultan— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did with this edit to Tipu Sultan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I had posted this same warning on page on Maestro2016, he is just trying to present his own opinion by using an unpopular Marxist book. Geunineart (talk)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Maestro2016 (talk) 12:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Coffee: I had made only 2 reverts and then I went to report Maestro2016, I was the one to open the discussion as well. I was not edit warring or reverting anymore, while edit warring block requires at least 3 or 4 reverts in 24. Also the "Dec 3" warning that you have referred, concerned Tipu Sultan article, where my edits got consensus. Geunineart (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Regardless, you knew of our edit-warring policy. Administrators do not only block 3RR violations, as you can discover by reading WP:EW. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
GenuineArt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I had made only 2 reverts and didn't reverted anymore only discussed the edits on talk page by starting the discussion myself. The block is unwarranted because there is only one editor who edit warred 3 other editors except me. Geunineart (talk) 15:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
<sigh /> You need not have made 3 reverts in 24 hours to receive a block for edit warring. That is a common misconception. Trying to blame others, and saying "why me and not them", are not valid unblock reasons. You must own the behavior and affirm that you will not repeat the behavior. Thanks -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @Dlohcierekim: In any case I was not the one edit warring, only one user was. That's something you haven't pointed out. Geunineart (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Do I need to increase your block time until you read WP:EW? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 19:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- I have but what is next? Since this is my first offense in years, you can propose me how the block can be commuted and what I will need to do. Geunineart (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Do you still believe you weren't edit-warring? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 19:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think I was, shouldn't have reverted 2nd time. Geunineart (talk) 19:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Do you still believe you weren't edit-warring? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 19:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- I have but what is next? Since this is my first offense in years, you can propose me how the block can be commuted and what I will need to do. Geunineart (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Do I need to increase your block time until you read WP:EW? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 19:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Dlohcierekim: In any case I was not the one edit warring, only one user was. That's something you haven't pointed out. Geunineart (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Perfect answer, I will lift the block from your account now. Please note, if you edit-war in the future administrators will be less likely to have any lenience on you. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 19:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Margot Kidder
I reverted your last edit at Margot Kidder because you removed the single quote (') after 'Baghdad Betty', but not the one before that phrase. I know that '" looks awkward, but there is a point in having "Baghdad Betty" in quotes. Maybe the sentence can be rephrased to avoid the '". - Donald Albury 12:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)