Misplaced Pages

User talk:ViriiK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:03, 27 November 2006 editViriiK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,246 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:03, 27 November 2006 edit undoGnangarra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers28,456 edits Locking down the biographical pages regarding []: responseNext edit →
Line 116: Line 116:
:You listed all those GWB articles for protection I checked the history of each and there isnt enough evidence of vandalism to warrant protection, please read ]. ] 06:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC) :You listed all those GWB articles for protection I checked the history of each and there isnt enough evidence of vandalism to warrant protection, please read ]. ] 06:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
::Are you trying to insult me? No offense, but there is enough vandalism going back to each creation of the articles and they're almost always from non-registered users. I'll be watching these pages and noting how much vandalism has been done over time. I'm sorry but I have a hard time understanding why you're calling me a liar with your ] afterall that's what it is about. ] 12:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC) ::Are you trying to insult me? No offense, but there is enough vandalism going back to each creation of the articles and they're almost always from non-registered users. I'll be watching these pages and noting how much vandalism has been done over time. I'm sorry but I have a hard time understanding why you're calling me a liar with your ] afterall that's what it is about. ] 12:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
:::I'm not calling you a liar, I just saying is why give ideas to the vandals, when I assessed all the articles this is what I found:
::::* ] - 1 vandal edit 27/11 and 1 on 14/11
::::* ] - last vandal edit 25/11 previous 1 edit on 21/11, 1 on 15/11
::::* ] - no reverted vandalism since 10/10
::::* ] - no vandalism since 21/10
::::* ] - last vandalism 1 edit 24/11, next prior was 21/11 with 7 edits over 6 hours
::::* ] 1 vandal edit 1/11 and 1 on 31/10
::::* ] last vandalism 30/10
::::* ] 1 vandal edit 17/11 and previous vandalism was 17/10
:::If your not happy with my assessment of articles history please provide difs to show where there are significant recent acts of IP vandalism that would warrant protecting the page and I'll protect them. Alternatively you can resubmit for another editor assess them. ] 13:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:03, 27 November 2006

Ship Table

Ship Fate Box

Template:Ship fate box target
Template:Ship fate box active in service
Template:Ship fate box museum ship
Template:Ship fate box transferred
Template:Ship fate box target
Template:Ship fate box ordered
Template:Ship fate box scrapped
Template:Ship fate box exploded
Template:Ship fate box sunk enemy action
Template:Ship fate box in reserve
Template:Ship fate box disposed

Flags

Ports

Template:Ship Homeport HI
Template:Ship Homeport NOR
Template:Ship Homeport SD
Template:Ship Homeport MAY
Template:Ship Homeport YOK
Template:Ship Homeport BW
Template:Ship Homeport KB

Ticonderoga class

Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser displacement
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser length
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser beam
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser draught
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser propulsion
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser speed
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser complement
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser sensors
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser armament mark 26
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser armament mark 41
Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser aircraft

Ohio class

Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine displacement
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine length
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine beam
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine draft
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine propulsion
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine speed
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine complement
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine ssgn armament
Template:Ohio class ballistic missile submarine ssbn armament

Arleigh Burke class

Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer displacement I
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer displacement II
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer displacement IIA
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer length I
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer length IIA
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer beam
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer draft
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer speed
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer range
Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer complement

All comments goes underneath here. Thank you.

Steveng75

This users' edits to The King David School appear to be reasonable and done in good faith. I agree that his edits to Hezbollah and George W. Bush are not appropriate, but they also might have been done in good faith. At this point I'm not prepared to declare any of his post-block edits vandalism. Hesperian 23:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Locking down the biographical pages regarding George W. Bush

After examining the history logs for each biography, I made the determination to use the sprotect2 on these pages. There has been too many vandalism from IP addresses considering GWB is one of the most vandalized pages on wikipedia. So people move onto the daughter page to put in their vandalism since they can't do it on the main page with the sprotect2 lock in place. ViriiK 02:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

You listed all those GWB articles for protection I checked the history of each and there isnt enough evidence of vandalism to warrant protection, please read WP:BEAN. Gnangarra 06:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you trying to insult me? No offense, but there is enough vandalism going back to each creation of the articles and they're almost always from non-registered users. I'll be watching these pages and noting how much vandalism has been done over time. I'm sorry but I have a hard time understanding why you're calling me a liar with your Misplaced Pages:Don't stuff beans up your nose afterall that's what it is about. ViriiK 12:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not calling you a liar, I just saying is why give ideas to the vandals, when I assessed all the articles this is what I found:
If your not happy with my assessment of articles history please provide difs to show where there are significant recent acts of IP vandalism that would warrant protecting the page and I'll protect them. Alternatively you can resubmit for another editor assess them. Gnangarra 13:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
User talk:ViriiK: Difference between revisions Add topic