Revision as of 02:27, 5 September 2019 editTotodile493 (talk | contribs)19 edits →Controversy Explanation: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:29, 5 September 2019 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,282 editsm Signing comment by Totodile493 - "→Controversy Explanation: new section"Next edit → | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
== Controversy Explanation == | == Controversy Explanation == | ||
Perhaps a section should be written on this page that explains how "ephaebiophilia" contains controversy because creating a label for attraction to underage girls who cannot properly consent to important life decisions including having a partner, making physical embraces with them, and copulating with them shouldn't enable such behavior. | Perhaps a section should be written on this page that explains how "ephaebiophilia" contains controversy because creating a label for attraction to underage girls who cannot properly consent to important life decisions including having a partner, making physical embraces with them, and copulating with them shouldn't enable such behavior. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 02:29, 5 September 2019
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ephebophilia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ephebophilia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928081916/http://www.ihlia.nl/documents/pdflib/Vriendschap/1960/1960-04.pdf to http://www.ihlia.nl/documents/pdflib/Vriendschap/1960/1960-04.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Controversy Explanation
Perhaps a section should be written on this page that explains how "ephaebiophilia" contains controversy because creating a label for attraction to underage girls who cannot properly consent to important life decisions including having a partner, making physical embraces with them, and copulating with them shouldn't enable such behavior. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totodile493 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles