Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Kylu: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006 | Vote Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:43, 6 December 2006 editBdj (talk | contribs)19,739 edits Oppose: o← Previous edit Revision as of 15:45, 6 December 2006 edit undoFred Bauder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,115 edits SupportNext edit →
Line 57: Line 57:
#'''Strong Support''' ] 11:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC) #'''Strong Support''' ] 11:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' <b>]</b> <small>]</small> 15:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC) #'''Support''' <b>]</b> <small>]</small> 15:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' ] 15:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


==Oppose== ==Oppose==

Revision as of 15:45, 6 December 2006

Statement

I'm going for simplicity: I'll try to be reasonable, and remember to keep the best interests of Misplaced Pages first in my mind. If I think that I'm prejudiced regarding a case, I'll recuse. If you want to know my definitions of reasonableness, I'd ask you look to my actions, not my statements, but I'm willing to answer almost any questions you have. Thanks! :)

Questions

Support

Gurch 00:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Withdrawing vote. Sorry, Kylu – Gurch 05:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  1.  $PЯINGrαgђ  Always loyal! 00:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. ArbCom is a form of dispute resolution. As such, experience with other forms of dispute resolution is invaluable. As MedCabal Lead Coordinator, Kylu has the best qualifications here.--Ideogram 00:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Per Ideogram. --physicq (c) 00:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Cowman109 00:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. AmiDaniel (talk) 00:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. ++Lar: t/c 00:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Coredesat 00:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Cyde Weys 00:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. maclean 00:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Time issues balanced by MedCabal experience. Titoxd 00:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  11. Jaranda 00:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  12. Hello32020 01:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  13. Khoikhoi 01:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  14. Samsara (talk  contribs) 01:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  15. Michael Billington (talkcontribs) 01:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  16. pschemp | talk 02:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  17. ßottesiηi 02:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  18. Mira 03:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  19. Warofdreams talk 04:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  20. semper fiMoe 05:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  21. Support. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 05:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  22. Support --Riley 06:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  23. support Bucketsofg 06:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  24. Nufy8 06:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  25. Support: policy is over sysops. --Sugaar 10:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  26. Nearly Headless Nick 12:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  27. Support (just dont have the userbox I'm afraid ...was just a little to pink for me. Okay, A LOT too pink! :) Glen 12:34, December 4, 2006 (UTC)
  28. Neigel von Teighen 12:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  29. Strongest Possible Support total confidence in Kylu's judgment and abilities. Rama's arrow 13:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  30. Support (based on answers to my questions) Anomo 14:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  31. Experience from MedCab, has good judgement.--§hanel 14:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  32. of course. -- Drini 16:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  33. Support Ge o. 17:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  34. Support  ♪♫ĽąĦĩŘǔ_Қ♫♪  19:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  35. Support experienced in dispute resolution. Eluchil404 19:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  36. Pilotguy (push to talk) 21:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  37. Support. Statement wins it. Regards, —Celestianpower 23:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  38. Support. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  39. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  40. Weak Support Just would prefer someone with more experience. Gizza 07:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  41. Support. I've said it before, and will gladly say it again. I've seen overwhelmingly good and helpful contributions from Kylu, and hope to see more of the same, in the future. Luna Santin 08:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  42. Support with only minor reservations about relative inexperience. Always seems intelligent and sensible. Metamagician3000 09:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  43. Jon Harald Søby 12:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  44. Strong Support Thε Halo 14:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  45. That's Hedley! Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 22:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  46. Support James.S (talk · contribs · count) — 00:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  47. Support. Nishkid64 01:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  48. Strong Support lovelaughterlife♥ 02:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  49. Strong Support Addhoc 11:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  50. Support Deizio talk 15:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  51. Support Fred Bauder 15:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose --ElKevbo 00:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Far too new - crz crztalk 00:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Ral315 (talk) (my votes) 00:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. Peta 01:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. The user's refusal to answer Giano's very much to-the-point questions is a big problem for me. Bishonen | talk 02:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC).
  7. TacoDeposit 02:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Insufficient experience, at least one recent instance of very poor judgement. --Robth 02:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  9. Strong oppose due to inclination to under-carpet games and lack of mainspace contributions. In most cases content editing is a must to not loose touch with reality. --Irpen 02:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  10. Does not have enough nor well-rounded enough experience here for such a position. --Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 02:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  11. KPbIC 03:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  12. Geogre 03:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  13. Oppose Not enough editing experience really to be considered. Jd2718 03:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  14. Per not enough experience - although activity in mediation is a very good start. I am looking forward to supporting you next time if this keeps up...-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  03:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  15. Terence Ong 04:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  16. Inexperience; very nice person, nevertheless. Xoloz 04:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  17. Too new. Not enough experience. —Centrxtalk • 04:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  18. Rebecca 04:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  19. AniMate 04:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  20. Weak oppose I suspect Kylu would make a very good arbitrator, actually, but she's rather new for the job, and her block of Giano under sub-optimal circumstances speaks to that inexperience. A little underripe. Opabinia regalis 04:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  21. THB 05:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  22. Sarah Ewart 05:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  23. Sorry, great start but way too soon. --Srikeit 05:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  24. Would likely support next time, but would prefer not to elect to ArbCom principles from the Giano case within this short a window. Serpent's Choice 05:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  25. Cryptic 06:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  26. Dylan Lake 07:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  27. Bishonen's concern is not without foundation, and the answers to several other questions are not consistent with those I'd hope a prospective ArbCommer would give; I do, though, join in Xoloz's observation that Kylu seems to be altogether kind and quite reasonable on the whole. Joe 07:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  28. Oppose. Per Bishonen's concerns. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  29. Oppose per Bish.  ALKIVAR08:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  30. Oppose. I don't believe in great arbitrators with negligible experience of mainspace editing and lots of experience in IRC chit chatting. --Ghirla 08:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  31. Oppose Catchpole 08:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  32. Oppose Inexperienced and seems to have a naivity which would cause her problems on the Arbcom. Giano 09:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  33. Too soon. – Chacor 09:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  34. cj | talk 09:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  35. Oppose --Van helsing 09:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  36. Strong oppose. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 12:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  37. Kusma (討論) 13:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  38. Shyam 13:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  39. Oppose, inexperience. --Muchness 14:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  40. Oppose, I like my Arbcom more salty (experienced) --Mcginnly | Natter 14:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  41. --Pjacobi 20:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  42. Oppose. An arbitrator needs to be able to face tough questioners, worse than Giano. AnonEMouse 21:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  43. Michael Snow 23:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  44. Didn't recognize the name and as such thought you were too new. Sorry, you seem like a nice person aside -- Samir धर्म 00:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  45. Viriditas | Talk 01:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  46. Oppose. I have reservations about whether she has the experience to think for herself, or whether she just does whatever her chat room buddies advise her to do. Misplaced Pages is not IRC. Friday (talk) 01:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  47. Seems like a great user, not yet ready for ArbCom. --Spangineer (háblame) 05:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  48. Oppose per Bishonen. --Arnzy (talk contribs) 08:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  49. Strongest possible oppose. Inexperienced (only on WP for 7 months), too trigger-happy, and above all, an appaling lack of contribs. 5846 edits and 2234 of them on User talk space??? Oh please, it's not even funny. -- Grafikm 09:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  50. --ragesoss 09:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  51. ALoan (Talk) 15:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  52. Oppose due to lack of time with the project.--Isotope23 15:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  53. Doug Bell  19:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  54. Andre (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  55. Oppose Not enough experience, not feeling any "vision" here -Drdisque 22:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  56. Oppose I think you'll be a good Arbitrator, but not this year. Renominate yourself next year.--*Kat* 01:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  57. Oppose Sorry, but you could use some more experience and focus more on the encyclopedic aspects of Misplaced Pages.-- danntm C 04:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  58. Oppose per the Giano issue. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Kylu: Difference between revisions Add topic