| Revision as of 17:00, 26 January 2020 editTayi Arajakate (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,082 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:22, 30 January 2020 edit undoSoman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers93,615 edits keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ::] I have struck creator as the recent updates are to be blamed for the PROMO. Can you also include the refs you are considering as ]? To be precise ] seems applicable here more than ], since BJYM is a sub-organization of BJP. ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 16:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) | ::] I have struck creator as the recent updates are to be blamed for the PROMO. Can you also include the refs you are considering as ]? To be precise ] seems applicable here more than ], since BJYM is a sub-organization of BJP. ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 16:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' ] wing of the BJP. It does seem like the article and all it's sub-wings ], ] are ]. Though if all included, a standalone article may be created but almost all sources that are presented either give it a passing mention and/or in association with the activities of BJP. Even though there are numerous sources which mention it in some capacity, per ], it does not fulfill the significant coverage criteria. ] (]) 16:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' ] wing of the BJP. It does seem like the article and all it's sub-wings ], ] are ]. Though if all included, a standalone article may be created but almost all sources that are presented either give it a passing mention and/or in association with the activities of BJP. Even though there are numerous sources which mention it in some capacity, per ], it does not fulfill the significant coverage criteria. ] (]) 16:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', this is slightly ridiculous. BJYM, which has a degree of autonomy visavi its mother party, is one of the largest political youth organizations in the world. Notability can easily verified. For example, here there claim of 5.5 million members. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjym-to-enrol-1-crore-new-members-before-lok-sabha-polls/articleshow/21085881.cms --] (]) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:22, 30 January 2020
Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A wing of a political party that fails WP:NORG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable media. This subset of a political party is not independently notable and no content to expand. Article had been created updated overtime with the sole purpose to WP:Promote its office bearers. DBigXrayᗙ 09:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. DBigXrayᗙ 09:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DBigXrayᗙ 09:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Comprehensively passes both the WP:GNG and WP:NORG. 1, 2, 3 , 4, 5, 6 Razer(talk) 17:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Razer2115, Please familiarize yourself with WP:ORGCRIT. The bar at WP:ORGCRIT is significantly higher than WP:GNG. All these 6 sources you have presented are WP:ROUTINE coverage by newspapers with WP:Passing Mention, none of these 6 pass as significant coverage of BJYM, so the WP:ORGCRIT criterion are not fulfilled by any of these links. DBigXrayᗙ 09:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - The applicable policies seem to be WP:CLUB and WP:NEXIST. The nominator needs to think twice before accusing an editor in good standing of creating an article with the sole purpose to WP:Promote its office bearers. Dee03 14:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- User:Dee03 I have struck creator as the recent updates are to be blamed for the PROMO. Can you also include the refs you are considering as WP:SIGCOV? To be precise WP:BRANCH seems applicable here more than WP:CLUB, since BJYM is a sub-organization of BJP. DBigXrayᗙ 16:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete WP:MILL wing of the BJP. It does seem like the article and all it's sub-wings BJYM Mumbai, BJYM Karnataka are WP:SOAP. Though if all included, a standalone article may be created but almost all sources that are presented either give it a passing mention and/or in association with the activities of BJP. Even though there are numerous sources which mention it in some capacity, per WP:ORG, it does not fulfill the significant coverage criteria. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, this is slightly ridiculous. BJYM, which has a degree of autonomy visavi its mother party, is one of the largest political youth organizations in the world. Notability can easily verified. For example, here there claim of 5.5 million members. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjym-to-enrol-1-crore-new-members-before-lok-sabha-polls/articleshow/21085881.cms --Soman (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)