Revision as of 19:03, 2 February 2020 editRenamed user U1krw4txwPvuEp3lqV382vOcqa7 (talk | contribs)68,802 edits D← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:34, 3 February 2020 edit undoSoman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers93,615 edits keepNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Comment''' , for example, is far from "routine coverage". I am concerned about the speed at which this user sends articles for deletion and whether they are actually conducting a ]. This is one of the three articles they AfD'd in eight minutes and another user expressed a similar concern on ] last month. ]] 03:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' , for example, is far from "routine coverage". I am concerned about the speed at which this user sends articles for deletion and whether they are actually conducting a ]. This is one of the three articles they AfD'd in eight minutes and another user expressed a similar concern on ] last month. ]] 03:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' per ], ], and ]. The org fails ] to have a separate page. The HT link posted by Dee03 is an interview of the president of this organisation and hence it cannot be used to claim notability. The bar is much higher in ORGCRIT. ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 19:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ], ], and ]. The org fails ] to have a separate page. The HT link posted by Dee03 is an interview of the president of this organisation and hence it cannot be used to claim notability. The bar is much higher in ORGCRIT. ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">]]</span>'' 19:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''', clearly a notable organization. The fact that you might ] is irrelevant in an AfD debate. --] (]) 18:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:34, 3 February 2020
Muslim Rashtriya Manch
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Muslim Rashtriya Manch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Every sources are routine coverages. The article fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:58, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MILL, WP:NOTDIR, and WP:SOAP. This is yet another minor, local charity, which probably does good work, but we're not a directory nor a soap-box. Bearian (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This source, for example, is far from "routine coverage". I am concerned about the speed at which this user sends articles for deletion and whether they are actually conducting a WP:BEFORE. This is one of the three articles they AfD'd in eight minutes and another user expressed a similar concern on their talk page last month. Dee03 03:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MILL, WP:NOTDIR, and WP:SOAP. The org fails WP:ORGCRIT to have a separate page. The HT link posted by Dee03 is an interview of the president of this organisation and hence it cannot be used to claim notability. The bar is much higher in ORGCRIT. DBigXrayᗙ 19:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, clearly a notable organization. The fact that you might dislike the organization is irrelevant in an AfD debate. --Soman (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)