| Revision as of 01:12, 16 December 2006 editMerzbow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers7,854 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:16, 16 December 2006 edit undoShams2006 (talk | contribs)60 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| *'''Keep''': Does ] also exist to promote a negative view of Islam? It does not and therefore, a collaborative effort to improve articles on the main theme of ''']''' is not promoting a negative view, rather it is striving to improve these articles which is a noble purpose. If "Criticism" looks POV to you, lets rename this taskforce to "Islam and Controversy" taskforce. --] 21:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': Does ] also exist to promote a negative view of Islam? It does not and therefore, a collaborative effort to improve articles on the main theme of ''']''' is not promoting a negative view, rather it is striving to improve these articles which is a noble purpose. If "Criticism" looks POV to you, lets rename this taskforce to "Islam and Controversy" taskforce. --] 21:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :: A dishonest response. The taskforce mentions 'articles related to criticism of Islam", not the article "Criticism of Islam" itself. Therefore the purpose of this group is to promote anti-Islamic articles. Such discussions can be held in Wikiproject Islam itself, but your intention is to create a meeting ground for those with this POV bias. | |||
| *'''Keep''': The project's goals as stated on the page and talk page are not contrary to Misplaced Pages policies. I think the nominator misread the intent, so perhaps a different name would help. Also not sure if deletion is the right avenue to discuss an active project. —] <sup>]</sup> 21:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': The project's goals as stated on the page and talk page are not contrary to Misplaced Pages policies. I think the nominator misread the intent, so perhaps a different name would help. Also not sure if deletion is the right avenue to discuss an active project. —] <sup>]</sup> 21:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:16, 16 December 2006
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Islam/Criticism of Islam task force
The group is explicitly created to promote articles with a certain POV (i.e. "Criticism") Wikiproject:Islam already exists for all topics regarding Islam to be discussed, a separate group for efforts promoting a negative view is inappropriate. Shams2006 21:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: Does Criticism of Islam also exist to promote a negative view of Islam? It does not and therefore, a collaborative effort to improve articles on the main theme of Criticism of Islam is not promoting a negative view, rather it is striving to improve these articles which is a noble purpose. If "Criticism" looks POV to you, lets rename this taskforce to "Islam and Controversy" taskforce. --Matt57 21:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- A dishonest response. The taskforce mentions 'articles related to criticism of Islam", not the article "Criticism of Islam" itself. Therefore the purpose of this group is to promote anti-Islamic articles. Such discussions can be held in Wikiproject Islam itself, but your intention is to create a meeting ground for those with this POV bias.
- Keep: The project's goals as stated on the page and talk page are not contrary to Misplaced Pages policies. I think the nominator misread the intent, so perhaps a different name would help. Also not sure if deletion is the right avenue to discuss an active project. —Doug Bell 21:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: Matt57 and Doug Bell are right. Arrow740 22:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Yes, it is to promote pages about criticism of Islam. So what? Those pages deserve to be well written, just like anything else. -Amarkov edits 00:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep it clearly states that they the purpose is to improve the quality of a narrow (though there are a fair number of pages) topic. Can you demonstrate that they are doing something other than that? Koweja 01:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per all of the above. - Merzbow 01:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)