| Revision as of 06:48, 19 December 2006 editNormy132 (talk | contribs)2,058 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:59, 19 December 2006 edit undo67.86.149.41 (talk) →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Delete''', fails ] criteria. ]]]] 05:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', fails ] criteria. ]]]] 05:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Concur with Normy - no reason for deletion specified. Wrestler is notable - first Australian indy wrestler to appear on a pay per view event (WWA Eruption). Will source within a week. ] 06:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Concur with Normy - no reason for deletion specified. Wrestler is notable - first Australian indy wrestler to appear on a pay per view event (WWA Eruption). Will source within a week. ] 06:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I was the one who nominated it for deletion and because I'm anonymous, it would not let me put a reason for deletion.] 06:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*'''Comment''' That fact about him being the first Aussie indy wrestler to appear on PPV doesn't really have much merit in terms of notablity behind it. As much as I want to keep this article around (because he's a well known Aussie wrestler) that fact is fairly pointless and I'd doubt whether it's true or not. ]'']'' 06:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | :*'''Comment''' That fact about him being the first Aussie indy wrestler to appear on PPV doesn't really have much merit in terms of notablity behind it. As much as I want to keep this article around (because he's a well known Aussie wrestler) that fact is fairly pointless and I'd doubt whether it's true or not. ]'']'' 06:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:59, 19 December 2006
Chuck E. Chaos
Nominated for deletion by 67.86.149.41. No reason specified. This is a procedural nomination - my opinion is Neutral. Tevildo 02:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep because no reason for deletion was specified. Normy132 02:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. While there's no reason given, I think the reason is kind of foregone. The subject fails WP:BIO at this point. A cleanup or more assertion of notability would change my mind. --Dennisthe2 02:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- oops... That's me. --Dennisthe2 02:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not notable enough to warrant a Misplaced Pages entry.67.86.149.41 02:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per non-notability. ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ 03:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Here's a novel concept: Research. I did a google search and turned up: 1) Misplaced Pages and mirrors 2) his own Myspace page and 3) announcements of his appearance. 2 cannot be used to establish notability, failing the "independant" test; and 3 cannot be used to establish notability, as it fails the "nontrivial" test. No other references can be found that establish notability yet. If anyone finds some, I could change my vote. Unless and until that happens, I vote delete. --Jayron32 04:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I concur with Jayron's findings. Fails WP:BIO. MER-C 04:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:BIO criteria. Terence Ong 05:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Concur with Normy - no reason for deletion specified. Wrestler is notable - first Australian indy wrestler to appear on a pay per view event (WWA Eruption). Will source within a week. 203.17.215.99 06:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
I was the one who nominated it for deletion and because I'm anonymous, it would not let me put a reason for deletion.67.86.149.41 06:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment That fact about him being the first Aussie indy wrestler to appear on PPV doesn't really have much merit in terms of notablity behind it. As much as I want to keep this article around (because he's a well known Aussie wrestler) that fact is fairly pointless and I'd doubt whether it's true or not. Normy132 06:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)