Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110521063019/http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=community&id=5400678 to http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=community&id=5400678
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 19:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Tammy Duckworth is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
What stance has Representative Duckworth taken on Thailand's Coup and dictatorship. With personal connections, no doubt she greets Thais often and gives speeches to the Thai community. Has she condemned the Thai junta and the jailing of people in Thailand based on speech? What stance has she taken and if she hasn't condemned the dictatorship how does she justify her silence or support of it considering people in Thailand are being detained for the slightest criticism of the junta and Thai royal family. 203.131.210.82 (talk) 05:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
You tell us what her stance is. Questions of how people justify things are not relevant here. This is an encyclopedia, not a blog. -- Jibal (talk) 11:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Audit
Re. this text: "The Department's lack of controls and record keeping was in place before Duckworth came into office," I'm still not finding that in the source. The source says "And then-Illinois Auditor General Bill Holland in 2009 released a fairly critical audit of the department, mostly during Duckworth's tenure, saying that it lacked internal financial controls and records and generally was run in a somewhat sloppy fashion." Where in the source does it say the issues were in place before Duckworth's tenure? Champaign Supernova (talk) 18:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The article says "Despite flaws in financial controls that surfaced under both Duckworth and her predecessor, no action was taken, Crump said." This seems to be an opinion attributed to Crump, who was suing criticizing Duckworth. Regardless, the sentence "The Department's lack of controls and record keeping was in place before Duckworth came into office" is much stronger than what the article says, which is just that there were problems with the predecessor and with Duckworth. Besides, the article says "And then-Illinois Auditor General Bill Holland in 2009 released a fairly critical audit of the department, mostly during Duckworth's tenure, saying that it lacked internal financial controls and records and generally was run in a somewhat sloppy fashion." It seems clear the article (and the audit) are saying the majority of issues were during Duckworth's tenure. I don't think our article as it stands neutrally describes the sourcing, and it should be changed. Champaign Supernova (talk) 18:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
"Mostly" - it's of course too bad we don't cover the report apart from that quote you give (that "mostly" quote is barely informative let alone NPOV) but "mostly" definitely means not all under Duckworth, and the source goes on to say it was under her predecessor, also, so it is precisely NPOV which requires us to relate that information to give the full context, if we use that source. Alanscottwalker (talk) 19:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Also, because it is a BLP issue as to Crump, Crump at least as far as that source is concerned did not sue anyone, so you should probably redact that. Alanscottwalker (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Official Senate Portrait
Senator Duckworth's official Senate portrait has been released.
I'm not good at the image uploading process. Could someone else take the wheel? That way we won't have to use her old House portrait anymore (been over a year now).
"Reflecting the strength of the arguments that the subject is a public figure whose personal details are already widely available and reported in high quality sources including those of the government, the consensus weighs heavily toward the fact that while the subject does not desire her DoB to be mentioned in Misplaced Pages, it should be cited in the article. Reflecting the strength of the arguments that the subject is a public figure whose personal details are already widely available and reported in high quality sources including those of the government, the consensus weighs heavily toward the fact that while the subject does not desire her DoB to be mentioned in Misplaced Pages, it should be cited in the article."
This is so much bullshit, and highlights a serious problem with Misplaced Pages's enforcement of its policies. Misplaced Pages policy explicitly states that the date of birth shall not be published if the living subject of the article asks for it not to be published. No "arguments" by editors or "consensus" can override policy. Nothing in the above quoted drivel is relevant. -- Jibal (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
No Misplaced Pages policy requires what you claim. She is a well known public figure and her birth date is public and well established in reliable biography sources. Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Huh... I just stumbled across this page again, after hearing that Sen. Duckworth is expecting! I participated in the RfC over 4 years ago, and I'm surprised to see that it's still somewhat discussed today! Edge3 (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, I think this is the first-time its been resurrected and someone may try to include her children's birth dates, which, no, should not be included. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Agreed. From a cursory Google search, it looks like her full name is Ladda Tammy Duckworth. If that's the case, that's what should be used in the lead sentence per MOS:BIRTHNAME. Surachit (talk) 22:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
There is no dispute that Sen. Duckworth, like many other Americans who have 1 or more American citizen parents when born abroad, is a US citizen. John McCain, Ted Cruz, and George W. Romney among others were all born abroad, but the natural-born-citizen clause of the US Constitution is not explained on the their pages. Many Americans, like a friend of mine who's father was a USAF officer were born on foreign military bases or embassies, or other just when the parents were overseas for some other reason. There is no reason to have the "Under long standing US law, she is a natural-born citizen because her father is American" sentence in the "Early life and education" section. --rogerd (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
There are two likely explanations for the "natural-born citizen" clause in the Constitution: 1) to prohibit "high-born" Royals from seizing the US Presidency or 2) to require the president, after ratification of the Constitution, to be a "native-born" American. If the former, Tammy Duckworth is elgible; if the latter, Tammy Duckworth is ineligible. Until a court hears the case against Tammy Duckworth, it is a matter of dispute and not suitable for encyclopedic content. If she doesn't actually end up on the ballot for Vice President or President of the United States, it's not relevant at all to her. I strongly suggest omitting any reference to the issue until it has some legal context attributed to it. Opinion of Congressional Research which makes no mention of the circumstances of Tammy Duckworth nor an article that tongue-in-cheek references the aforementioned opinion is adequate for encyclopedic reference. --FordGT90Concept (talk) 22:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
I disagree about #2. Cruz's, McCain's and George Romney's eligibility were never seriously questioned, despite the fact they were born in Canada, Panama Canal Zone, and Mexico, respectively. McCain was the nominee of a major party. --rogerd (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
@Rogerd:, @FordGT90Concept: I disagree with Rogerd because of the "Where's the birth certificate?" fake controversy of the Obama years. (Note they don't apply to Cruz the standard they applied to Obama.) The facts ought to be clearly stated before someone attempts to again resurrect this non-issue. But if there's a consensus otherwise, then the consensus should prevail.
Huh? Obama was born in the US (although some disputed it), and Duckworth (and the others I cited) were not. BTW, even if Obama had been born outside of the US, (which he clearly wasn't), he would be a natural born citizen because of his mother's citizenship. However, the two situations are unrelated. My point is this is not a big deal and not worth even mentioning in the article, anymore than it is Cruz's, George Romney's, or McCain's. --rogerd (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
It is a significant enough issue to mention in this article if the reliable sources we use have deemed it a significant enough issue to mention. Otherwise, I agree we should leave it out. After all, if Biden doesn't pick her as veep, the whole convo is moot. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
What reliable sources? You cite one article by National Review, which is ok, but that it hardly overwhelming evidence that many people are questioning her qualifications. Again, she isn't the first person to potentially be in the running for the top 2 jobs to have been born overseas. --rogerd (talk) 14:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Rogerd, I think you missed my point. If the reliable sources aren't questioning Duckworth's eligibility, then we shouldn't say anything about it. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
@Rogerd: Obama's critics falsely claim he's not a natural born citizen because he was born in a foreign country (Kenya) to an American mother. But they do not raise the same issue against Cruz, who was born in a foreign country (Canada) to an American mother. If they argued consistently, Obama being disqualified for a supposedly foreign birth to an American mother would also DQ Cruz, who was born in a foreign country to an American mother. That's my point - inconsistent argumentation.
Referencing and citation: criterion met
Done 