| Revision as of 22:33, 28 December 2006 editHagermanBot (talk | contribs)95,722 editsm 69.110.14.102 didn't sign: "failed rfa"← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:57, 30 December 2006 edit undoSeraphimblade (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,293 edits Archive talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ]<br /> | ]<br /> | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| == Editor review == | |||
| Thanks for having requested an ]. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at ], where you may read last minute additions. | |||
| We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at ]. ] 01:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Editor review == | |||
| Thanks for having requested an ]. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at ], where you may read last minute additions. | |||
| We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at ]. ] 01:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RfA Nomination == | |||
| I would like to nominate you for an RfA, are you interested? ] 12:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Let's discuss this on your talk page. ] 00:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata" id="afd" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #FFFAEF; border: 1px solid #999999; text-align: left; font-size:95%;"> | |||
| '''] would like to nominate you to be an administrator.''' Please visit ] to see what this process entails, and then ] to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at ''']'''. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.</div> | |||
| :Your nomination is ], with my gratitude. ] 01:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Hey sorry if my block tainted your RfA. It was subsequently suspended as I stated I would not converse with those who were angering me. ] 07:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Don't be sorry a bit. If you'd like me to have a look over the situation and give some input, I'd be happy to. Other than that-one hopes that those !voting in an RfA would be looking at the candidate, not unrelated circumstances. ] 07:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I wrote you an email, thanks for the understanding. I would prefer to discuss it off wikipedia as I had proposed to not discuss it here for 72 hours when I requested the unblock. ] 07:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Questions about articles== | |||
| Hi, I'd like to know if I am able to add any keywords into articles, so it will be easier to find when people are searching. ] 04:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your RfA comment == | |||
| Hello! I saw and I would like to say thank you! Your opinions are your own and I wouldn't expect anyone to blindly jump up and do whatever I say! An RfA is a learning experience for everyone, subject and community as a whole, and I hope that you get lots of useful and constructive criticism for your Wiki-career, whichever way the opinion flows this time. Doing any of the things that I have suggested will assist the project greatly - and so will a lot of other tasks, many of which I am not even aware and this place is so vast! Whatever - stay positive, edit constructively and have a happy Christmas and a good New Year! Best wishes, ] 01:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :And the same to you, thanks! ] 02:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| This issue is discussed in his article and is not as clear cut as you might think. ] 04:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for Adminship == | |||
| It is my regretful task to inform you that I have closed your request for adminship early as unlikely to achieve consensus. Please do not be discouraged; a number of users have had their first RfA end without consensus, but have been promoted overwhelmingly in a later request. Please continue to make outstanding contributions to Misplaced Pages, and consider requesting adminship again in the future. You may find ] helpful in deciding when to consider running again. If I can be of any help to you, please do not hesitate to ask. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] ]</span> 11:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry that your hard work didn't pay off this time, but I am sure that with your dedicated attitude you won't have a problem running again in three months-or-so. Keep up the valuable contributions! Regards, ] 11:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == How do I create a redirect? == | |||
| Hi. I want to create a redirect for ]. It has an abbreviation called "TaipeiEx". ] 11:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Problem solved. Thank you anyway. I found information here: ]. ] 11:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RFA == | |||
| Hey sorry about that buddy, well I honestly think that you are doing a great job. But you just need some more experience, keep up the good work and maybe next year I will nominate you. — ] 14:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Just keep up what you're doing. My objection was that your tenure here was so short that it was unlikely that you'd delved enough into policies and guidelines to be able to enforce them. With time, you'll run into more funky situations, and will learn more about the policies. Everything else you're doing is fine. Try again in ~six months. Cheers! | ] <small>]</small> 16:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I know that the block that was in discussion was placed in error. I read ]'s comments about the block and I agree with Samir that you dealt with the issue in a classy way. Then, I read that there was discussion of another block (which I saw was subsequently noted in the discussion in your RfA). The fact that there was another block-- made me think there was something to this and it tainted you in my eyes-- so, I left my comment as is. I did consider changing my comment-- shortly after I made it... before any one else had commented--to reflect this. In hindsight, the reason I gave wasn't a completely fair justification--and for this I offer an apology. That said, I stand by my judgment-- I think it was right, even if the given reason wasn't completely right for the conclusion I had drawn. | |||
| ::Looking forward, if you acknowledge the blocks I don't think they can bite you. Also, should something like this happen again-- i.e. a block close to a RfA, it is much better to bring this to the RfA than someone else bringing it up. Further, I think it better to write an ] to the nomination/questions (if you want to comment on something)-- than enter the fray in the support/oppose/neutral section. An addendum is probably more visible. Also, I think it is more respectful of those voting; in some sense, if the person up for RfA comments in the support/oppose/neutral section it is like a politician campaigning at the election booth (a no-no in most places). All things considered, I think you have a good chance at becoming an admin-- if you run again in the future and steer clear of any problems. ] <small>]|]</small> 17:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hey there, sorry your RfA didn't succeed. I think others have given you some pretty good advice: just keep going and get a little more experience (as I just keep making my way around this place, I keep learning new stuff about it which will help me), and you'll likely be successful in the future. ] 22:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == RfA == | |||
| Hi there; I think it is only fair to point out that you are seeking advice from someone whose RfA in November failed to achieve consensus!! | |||
| But to answer your question as well as I can: what contributors look for is:- | |||
| 1. Absence of any significant edit conflicts in the recent past. | |||
| 2. Absolutely no suggestion or threat of being blocked at least within say six months. | |||
| 3. A good and steady level of contribution to mainspace. | |||
| 4. A good and well-spread contribution to Namespace. | |||
| 5. Good answers to the questions, indicating a good understanding of Wiki policy. | |||
| And I must say that in my view you pretty much achieved that last time. Being nominsated by an editor who then got blocked was clearly not your fault, and I paid no attention to it, but clearly a number of editors did. | |||
| I would suggest that you wait three months - applying before will tend to gather oppose votes on the basis thay not enough time has elapsed - and try again. You could actually ask for views from oppose voters - most of us are reasonably friendly even in that situation. | |||
| If you need nominating in March let me know; I could probably do it unless anything silly happens.--] 23:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == A summary of my block == | |||
| Hi, you may want to check out the summary statement I have written regarding my block. I'd appreciate your comments by e-mail on the subject.] Thanks. ] 08:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ]'s ] == | |||
| {|style="background-color: #CC9966; padding: 4px; border: 1px solid #777;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |style="background-color: #FFFFCC; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #777;"|Hello, and thank you for the support on my recent ]. The final tally was '''63/3/2''', and I have now been entrusted with the ]. I hope I can live up to your trust, and certainly welcome any and all ]. All the best, and thanks again! — ] 13:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi, Can you do few editing on "Funeral in London" to make more NPOV. | |||
| ] 26 Dec. 2006 | |||
| ==Quixtar's Bomb== | |||
| Hello. I note you changed the POV edits re Quixtar's bomb. The same changes were made to the ] article. I'd appreciate it if you could correct this on that article also. An admin is not letting me edit the Quixtar article because, as you know I am an Amway rep in Europe, and Amway is of course owned by the same company as Quixtar. cheers, --] 00:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == failed rfa == | |||
| sadly, it looks like your well-intentioned work at ] ruined your chances. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 22:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
Revision as of 15:57, 30 December 2006
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Seraphimblade. |
Talk page for Seraphimblade
Please feel free to post suggestions/comments/flames/whatever.
If you haven't posted a comment already, please put it under a new section, using markup:
==New section==
Your comment ~~~~
If you have, please post it under the section you started. Responses will be made on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
This page will be archived regularly, but that doesn't mean I consider the discussion closed if you have more to say. If your old comments are archived please start a new section on this page for further comment. Please remember to sign your comments using ~~~~. Seraphimblade 10:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
If I contacted you on your talk page, I'll keep it on watch. Please feel free to reply either there or on this page, whichever's easier for you. Seraphimblade 03:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Old page archives
User talk:Seraphimblade/archive 1
User talk:Seraphimblade/archive 2
User talk:Seraphimblade/archive 3
User talk:Seraphimblade/archive 4